Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-995ml Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T21:12:01.731Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Big boys don't cry: male secondary school students' attitudes to depression

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 June 2014

Robert Kerr*
Affiliation:
M43, Goldsmith Hall, School of Social Work and Social Policy, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland
Shane Burke
Affiliation:
Respond. Housing Association, High Park, 15 Grace Park Road, Drumcondra, Dublin 9, Ireland
Patrick McKeon
Affiliation:
St Patrick's Hospital, James's Street, Dublin 8, Ireland
*
*Correspondence Email: kerrr@tcd.ie.

Abstract

Objectives: In an earlier qualitative study we explored the attitudes of young men aged 15-19 (Group A) to mental health and, in particular, to engaging with the various mental health services available. We found that the participants perceived stigma in connection with mental ill health and they displayed particularly strong negative attitudes in relation to both doctors and medication. The investigation was then repeated with students who had been given a short (less than two-hour) programme called ‘Beat the Blues’ (BTB) about mental health (Group B) in order to assess the effect of that exposure by comparing the attitudes of the two groups of students. This present phase of the analysis is a quantitative examination of the written responses by both Groups A and B to an administered questionnaire.

Methods: A total of 42 young men took part in eight focus groups held in boys-only Dublin secondary schools, described in Burke et al. A questionnaire, administered to each participant, examined the students' attitudes to depression and mental illness. The results were analysed by computer using SPSS to search for any trends and any contrasts between groups A and B and among the different socio-economic groups (SEGs) within the sample.

Results: Almost no statistically significant differences were found between groups A and B. However, some differences were found among the SEGs. In particular, very significant differences (p < 0.01 in each case), were found in attitudes towards depression, with increasing support for statements such as “People with depression just need to snap out of it”, “Drinking alcohol can help cure depression” and “Depression is only an excuse for laziness” found among the lower SEGs. A very high percentage of students indicated their desire to talk to someone in times of personal stress; this was almost always their best friend or their mother. However, most students said they would be uncomfortable if a friend raised such a topic.

Conclusion: The main conclusion – that a single exposure to a positive programme about depression produces little or no effect – is hardly unexpected. Nonetheless, there are indications of a great willingness among older secondary students to learn about and discuss mental health issues. Furthermore, the highly negative attitudes among students from the lowest socio-economic group in this study would seem to indicate that the greatest need for education about mental health lies with working-class adolescents. Hence, it is recommended that a programme of multiple interventions be introduced into the senior cycle of secondary education.

Type
Original Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Burke, S, Kerr, R, McKeon, P.Male secondary school students' attitudes towards using mental health services. Ir J Psych Med 2008; 25(2): 5256.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Walsh, D. (2008) Suicide, attempted suicide and prevention in Ireland and elsewhere HRB Overview Series 7. Dublin: Health Research Board [p. 35: “Because of the small numbers involved, particularly for females, it is unwise to draw any conclusions concerning trends in such short-run data. Nevertheless, there is a clear downward trend from the peak year of 1998.”].Google Scholar
4.RTE News. Road Deaths in Ireland 2006. www.rte.ie/news/features/roadsafety/list.htmlGoogle Scholar
5.Health Service Executive. Reach Out. 2005.Google Scholar
6.Weare, K, Murray, M. (2004) Building a Sustainable Approach to Mental Health Work in Schools. Int J Ment Health Prom 2004; 6(2): 5359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.McKeon, P, Healy, J, Bailey, G, Ward, G.Depression: Keeping hope alive. Dublin: Aware, 2000.Google Scholar
8.McKeon, P, Gavigan, P, Carr, A.Urban Public Attitudes to the Treatment of Psychological Problems and Depression in General Practice. Ir Med J 2000; 93(7): 200202Google Scholar
9.O'Reilly, A.The role of telephone help lines in combating childhood adversity: the experience of Childline (Ireland). In: Ferguson, H, Gilligan, R, Torode, R (eds). Surviving childhood adversity: issues for policy and practice. Dublin: Social Studies Press, Trinity College Dublin, 1993: 302311.Google Scholar
10.Keenaghan, C, Kilroe, J.A study on the quality of life. Tool Kidscreen for children and adolescents in Ireland: results of the Kidscreen national survey 2005. Dublin: Office of the Minister for Children, Department of Health and Children, 2008.Google Scholar
11.Bender, DE, Ewbank, D.The focus group as a tool for health research: issues in design and analysis. Health Transit Review 1994; 4(1): 6380.Google ScholarPubMed
12.Kitzinger, J.Qualitative Research: introducing focus groups. BMJ 1995; 311: 299302.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13 Stewart, DW, Shamdasani, PN. Focus groups: theory and practice. London: Sage, 1990.Google Scholar
14.Coggan, C.Suicide: qualitative data from focus group interviews with youth. Soc Sci Med 1997; 45(10): 15631570.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15. Beat the Blues, provided free to secondary schools by Aware Defeat Depression.Google Scholar