Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T12:53:31.324Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Ur III-Old Babylonian transition: An archaeological perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 August 2014

Elizabeth C. Stone
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Mesopotamian history tends to be phrased in terms of stages: Early Dynastic city-states replaced by imperial Akkad, bureaucratic Ur III replaced by the more individualistic Isin-Larsa and Old Babylonian periods thanks to the influence of the Amorites, etc. Lost in this process is a sense of the longue durée of Mesopotamian civilization, the basic and largely unchanging aspects of its society, economy and politics. In this paper I will explore one of these transitions, that between Ur III and Isin-Larsa/Old Babylonian times, by examining the nexus between the cuneiform and archaeological records.

My aim is to explore the circumstances that resulted in the unearthing of the textual record upon which our understanding of the Ur III and Old Babylonian periods is based. Where did these tablets come from and what were the circumstances that both led to their preservation and allowed them to be recovered so that we could read them? To answer these questions, it will be necessary to look at the interconnections between the survey data, excavated data and the written record.

The broad sweep of settlement and abandonment provided by the survey data collected and analysed by Adams and his students and colleagues (Adams 1965, 1972, 1981, Adams and Nissen 1972, Gibson 1972, Wright 1981) has a direct impact on our understanding of the archaeological contexts of the cuneiform texts. Sites are subject to forces of erosion so that periods of abandonment — even if temporary relative to Mesopotamia's four-thousand-year history — still selectively remove parts of the archaeological record. Since all texts derive from archaeological contexts they are by no means immune. Indeed unbaked clay tablets are some of the most fragile of the artifacts recovered from Mesopotamian sites, only surviving to the present when buried rapidly at the outset and remaining so until uncovered by the spade of the archaeologist or, more often unfortunately, the looter. Then there is also the issue of accessibility. In most instances both archaeologists and looters dig from the top of a site down, and generally not that far down. Thus most of our data, both archaeological and textual, derive from those levels closest to the exposed surfaces of archaeological sites.

Type
Research Article
Information
IRAQ , Volume 64 , 2002 , pp. 79 - 84
Copyright
Copyright © The British Institute for the Study of Iraq 2002 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

State University of New York at Stony Brook

References

References cited

Adams, R. McC. 1965 Land behind Baghdad. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Adams, R. McC. 1972 Settlement and irrigation patterns in ancient Akkad. In Gibson, 1972, pp. 182–208.Google Scholar
Adams, R. McC. 1981 Heartland of Cities: Surveys of Ancient Settlement and Land Use on the Central Floodplain of the Euphrates. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Adams, R. McC. and Nissen, H. 1972 The Uruk Countryside: The Natural Setting of Urban Societies. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Armstrong, J. A. and Brandt, M. C. 1994 Ancient dunes at Nippur. In Cinquante-deux réflexions sur le Proche-Orient ancien offertes en hommage à Léon De Meyer, edited by Gasche, H.. Peeters, Leuven.Google Scholar
Edzard, D. O. and Wilcke, C. 1977 Vorläufiger Bericht über die Inschriftenfunde 1973–4. In Hrouda, 1977, pp. 83–91.Google Scholar
Figulla, H. H. and Martin, W. J. 1953 UETN V. Letters and Documents of the Old-Babylonian Period. Percy Lund, Humphries and Co., London.Google Scholar
Finkbeiner, U. 1991 Uruk: Kampagne 35–37, 1982–1984: Die archäologische Oberflächenuntersuchung. Ausgrabungen in Uruk-Warka 4, P. von Zabern, Mainz am Rhein.Google Scholar
Gelb, I. J. 1976 Quantitative evaluation of slavery and serfdom. Journal of Cuneiform Studies 25: 195–207.Google Scholar
Gibson, McG. 1972 The City and Area of Kish. Field Research Projects, Coconut Grove.Google Scholar
Gibson, McG. 1975 Excavations at Nippur: Eleventh Season. Oriental Institute Communications 22. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Gibson, McG. 1978 Excavations at Nippur: Twelfth Season. Oriental Institute Communications 23. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Gibson, McG. 1992 Patterns of occupation at Nippur. In Nippur at the Centennial: Papers Read at the 35th Rencontre Assyriologique Internationale, Philadelphia, 1988, edited by Ellis, M., pp. 33–54. University Museum, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
von Haller, A. 1961 Der Sînkāšid-Palast. In XVII. UVB, edited by Lenzen, H., pp. 20–3. Verlag Gebr. Mann, Berlin.Google Scholar
von Haller, A. 1962 Die Ausgrabung am Sînkāšid-Palast. In XVIII. UVB, edited by Lenzen, H., pp. 23–9. Verlag Gebr. Mann, Berlin.Google Scholar
von Haller, A., Hecker, W. and Hecker, G. 1963 Die Ausgrabung am Sînkāšid-Palast. In XIX. UVB, edited by Lenzen, H., pp. 25–36. Verlag Gebr. Mann, Berlin.Google Scholar
Hrouda, B. (ed.) 1977 Isin-Išān Bahrīyāt I. Die Ergebnisse der Ausgrabungen 1973–1974. Bayerische Akademie der Wissenschaften, philosophisch-historische Klasse, Abh. N.F. 79. Verlag der Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Munich.Google Scholar
Hrouda, B. (ed.) 1981 Isin-Išān Bahrīyāt II. Die Ergebnisse der Ausgrabungen 1975–1978. Bayerische Akademie der Wissenschaften, philosophisch-historische Klasse, Abh. N.F. 87. Verlag der Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Munich.Google Scholar
Hrouda, B. (ed.) 1987 Isin-Išān Bahrīyāt III. Die Ergebnisse der Ausgrabungen 1983–1984. Bayerische Akademie der Wissenschaften, philosophisch-historische Klasse, Abh. N.F. 94. Verlag der Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Munich.Google Scholar
Hrouda, B. (ed.) 1992 Isin-Išān Bahrīyāt IV. Die Ergebnisse der Ausgrabungen 1986–1989. Bayerische Akademie der Wissenschaften, philosophisch-historische Klasse, Abh. N.F. 105. Verlag der Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Munich.Google Scholar
Krebernik, M. 1992 Die Textfunde der 9. Kampagne (1986). In Hrouda, 1992, pp. 102–44.Google Scholar
Lenzen, H. J., Haller, A. von, Schmidt, H. and Brandes, M. A. 1964 Der Sînkāšid-Palast. In XX. UVB, edited by Lenzen, H., pp. 28–32. Verlag Gebr. Mann, Berlin.Google Scholar
Lenzen, H. J., Schmidt, H., Hecker, W., Hecker, G. and Falkenstein, A. 1966 Der Palast des Sînkäšid. In XXII. UVB, edited by Lenzen, H., pp. 28–30. Verlag Gebr. Mann, Berlin.Google Scholar
Mallowan, M. 1947 Excavations at Tell Brak and Chagar Bazar. Iraq 9: 1–259.Google Scholar
Margueron, J. 1982 Recherches sur les palais mésopotamiens de l'âge du bronze. Librairie orientaliste Paul Geuthner, Paris.Google Scholar
McCown, D. E. and Haines, R. C. 1967 Nippur I. Temple of Enlil, Scribal Quarter and Soundings. Oriental Institute Publications 78. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Pollock, S. 1999 Ancient Mesopotamia: The Eden that Never Was. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Rothman, M. nd State and Private Agricultural Decision-Making in Early Second Millennium B. C. Southern Mesopotamia. Mss.Google Scholar
Rothman, M. 1994 Palace and private agricultural decision-making in the early 2nd millennium B.C. city-state of Larsa, Iraq. In The Economic Anthropology of the State, edited by Brumfiel, E., pp. 149–68. Monographs in Economic Anthropology. University Press of America, Lanham.Google Scholar
Sanati-Müller, S. 1988 Texte aus dem Sînkāšid-Palast. Erster Teil: Gerstenwerkverträge und Mehllieferungsurkunden. BaM 19: 471–538.Google Scholar
Sanati-Müller, S. 1989 Texte aus dem Sînkāšid-Palast. Zweiter Teil: Fischtexte und Bürgschaftsurkunden. BaM 20: 225–313.Google Scholar
Sanati-Müller, S. 1990 Texte aus dem Sînkāšid-Palast. Dritter Teil: Metalltexte. BaM 21: 131–213.Google Scholar
Sanati-Müller, S. 1991 Texte aus dem Sînkāšid-Palast. Vierter Teil: Texte verschiedenen Inhalts. BaM 22: 313–30.Google Scholar
Sanati-Müller, S. 1992 Texte aus dem Sînkāšid-Palast. Fünfter Teil: Texte verschiedenen Inhalts. BaM 23: 119–61.Google Scholar
Sanati-Müller, S. 1993 Texte aus dem Sînkāšid-Palast. Sechster Teil: Texte verschiedenen Inhalts. BaM 24: 137–84.Google Scholar
Sanati-Müller, S. 1994 Texte aus dem Sînkāšid-Palast. Siebenter Teil: Texte verschiedenen Inhalts. BaM 25: 309–40.Google Scholar
Sanati-Müller, S. 1995 Texte aus dem Sînkāšid-Palast. Achter Teil: Texte in Zusammenhang mit Skelettresten. BaM 26: 65–84.Google Scholar
Sommerfeld, W. 1992 Die Inschriften der 10. und 11. Kampagnen (1988 und 1989). In Hrouda, 1992, pp. 144–64.Google Scholar
Stein, G. 2001 Who was King? Who was not King? Social group composition and competition in early Mesopotamian state societies. In From Leaders to Rulers, edited by Haas, Jonathan, pp. 205–31. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York.Google Scholar
Steinkeller, P. 1989 Sale Documents of the Ur III Period. Freiburger Altorientalische Studien 17. Franz Steiner Verlag, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Stone, E. C. 1977 Economic crisis and social upheaval in Old Babylonian Nippur. In Mountains and Lowlands, edited by Levine, Louis D. and Young, T. Cuyler Jr., pp. 267–89. Undena Press, Malibu.Google Scholar
Walker, C. B. F. 1981 Preliminary report of the inscriptions autumn 1975, spring 1977, autumn 1978. In Hrouda, 1981, pp. 91–102.Google Scholar
Waetzoldt, H. 1987 Craft workers and officials in the Ur III period. In Labor in the Ancient Near East, edited by Powell, M., pp. 117–41. American Oriental Society, New Haven.Google Scholar
Wilcke, C. 1987 Inschriften 1983–1984 (7.–8. Kampagne). In Hrouda, 1987, pp. 83–120.Google Scholar
Woolley, L. Sir and SirMallowan, M. 1976 Ur Excavations VII. The Old Babylonian Period. British Museum Publications, London.Google Scholar
Wright, H. T. 1981 The southern margins of Sumer. Appendix in Adams 1981, pp. 295–345.Google Scholar
Zettler, R. L. 1992 The Ur III Temple of Inanna at Nippur. Berliner Beiträge zum Vorderen Orient 11. Dietrich Reimer Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar