Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nmvwc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-15T17:53:19.625Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

EMBELLISHING THE INTERIOR SPACES OF ASSYRIA'S ROYAL PALACES: THE BĒT ḪILĀNI RECONSIDERED

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 October 2017

David Kertai
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The bēt ḫilāni is one of the most famous features of Assyria's royal palaces as well as one of its most elusive. The term is mostly known from Assyrian royal inscriptions, which describe it as an architectural feature inspired by the architecture of Syro-Anatolia. Such explicit references to the architecture of other cultures is exceptional and provides a rare glimpse into the valuations of Assyria's architects.

Modern attempts to identify the bēt ḫilāni archaeologically are almost as old as the field of ancient Near Eastern Studies. Unfortunately, the discourse has become more convoluted over time through the integration of disparate architectural features into a single bēt ḫilāni discourse and a narrow view of how architectural exchanges occur. Past research has generally assumed a morphological correspondence between the Assyrian bēt ḫilāni and the external porticoes that typify Syro-Anatolian architecture. This article will argue that Assyrian architects had a different set of ideals and interests which led them to change the external Syro-Anatolian portico into an interior feature used to add monumentality and ornamentation to the rooms of Assyria's palaces. This changes the bēt ḫilāni from a morphological category into a decorative one and contextualises it within the architectural traditions of Assyria.

Type
Research Article
Information
IRAQ , Volume 79 , December 2017 , pp. 85 - 104
Copyright
Copyright © The British Institute for the Study of Iraq 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abou Assaf, A. 1996. Der Tempel von ʿAin Dara. Damaszener Forschungen 3. Mainz: Philipp von Zabern.Google Scholar
Akkermans, P. M. M. G. and Schwartz, G. M. 2003. The Archaeology of Syria: From Complex Hunter-Gatherers to Early Urban Societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Albenda, P. 1976. “Landscape Bas-Reliefs in the Bīt-Ḫilāni of Ashurbanipal”. Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research 224: 49–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albenda, P. 1986. The Palace of Sargon, King of Assyria: Monumental Wall Reliefs at Dur-Sharrukin, from Original Drawings Made at the Time of Their Discovery in 1843–1844 by Botta and Flandin. Synthese 22. Paris: Editions Recherche sur les Civilisations.Google Scholar
Bagg, A. M. 2000. Assyrische Wasserbauten: landwirtschaftliche Wasserbauten im Kernland Assyriens zwischen der 2. Hälfte des 2. und der 1. Hälfte des 1. Jahrtausends v. Chr. Bagdader Forschungen 24. Mainz: Philipp von Zabern.Google Scholar
Barnett, R. D. 1976. Sculptures From the North Palace of Ashurbanipal at Nineveh (668–627 BC). London: British Museum Publications.Google Scholar
Barnett, R. D., Bleibtreu, E. and Turner, G. 1998. Sculptures from the Southwest Palace of Sennacherib at Nineveh. London: British Museum Press.Google Scholar
Barnett, R. D. and Falkner, M. 1962. The Sculptures of Aššur-nasir-apli II, 883–859 B.C., Tiglath-pileser III, 745–727 B.C. and Esarhaddon, 681–669 B.C., from the Central and South-west Palaces at Nimrud. London: Trustees of the British Museum.Google Scholar
Barth, J. 1888. “Bȋt Ḫilȃní”. Zeitschrift für Assyriologie und vorderasiatische Archäologie 3: 93–94.Google Scholar
Battini, L. 2009. “Une inscription sur brique d'Enannatum I: un nouveau regard sur les lions gardiens des portes en Mésopotamie”. Antropozoologica 44/1: 189–209.Google Scholar
Bonatz, D. 2004. “Objekte der Kleinkunst als Ideenträger zwischen dem syro-anatolischen und dem assyrischen Raum. Das Problem der Elfenbeine”, in Novák, M., Prayon, F. and Wittke, A.-M., eds. Die Außenwirkung des späthethitischen Kulturraumes. Akten der zweiten Forschungstagung des Graduiertenkollegs „Anatolien und seine Nachbarn” der Eberhard-Karls-Universität Tübingen (20. bis 22. November 2003). Alter Orient und Altes Testament 323. Münster: Ugarit-Verlag. pp. 387–404.Google Scholar
Börker-Klähn, J. 1980. “Der bīt ḫilāni im bīt šaḫūri des Assur-Tempels”. Zeitschrift für Assyriologie und vorderasiatische Archäologie 70: 258–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bossert, H. T. 1933–34. “Bît ḫilāni — des Rätsels Lösung?”. Archiv für Orientforschung 9: 127.Google Scholar
Botta, P. E. 1849. Monument de Ninive. Tome I–II: Architecture et sculpture. Paris: Imprimerie nationale.Google Scholar
Botta, P. E. 1850. Monument de Ninive. Tome V: Texte. Paris: Imprimerie nationale.Google Scholar
Brochhardt, J. and Bleibtreu, E. 2011. “Aspektive und Perspektive im neuassyrische Flachbild”, in Selz, G. J., ed. The Empirical Dimension of Ancient Near Eastern Studies. Wiener Offene Orientalistik 6. Vienna: LIT. pp. 477–542.Google Scholar
Çilingiroğlu, A. 2012. “Urartian Temples”, in Gruber, C., Hellwag, U., Kroll, S., Roaf, M. and Zimansky, P. E., eds. Biainili-Urartu: the Proceedings of the Symposium Held in Munich 12–14 October 2007. Leuven: Peeters. pp. 295–307.Google Scholar
Collon, D. 1987. First Impressions: Cylinder Seals in the Ancient Near East. London: British Museum Publications.Google Scholar
Curtis, J. and Tallis, N. 2008. The Balawat Gates of Ashurnasirpal II. London: British Museum Press.Google Scholar
Dalley, S. 1994. “Nineveh, Babylon and the Hanging Gardens: Cuneiform and Classical Sources Reconciled”. Iraq 64: 45–58.Google Scholar
Driel, G. v. 1969. The Cult of Aššur. Studia Semitica Neerlandica 13. Assen: Van Gorcum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engel, B. J. 1987. Darstellungen von Dämonen und Tieren in assyrischen Palästen und Tempeln nach den schriftlichen Quellen. Mönchengladbach: G. Hackbarth. Google Scholar
Frahm, E. 1997. Einleitung in die Sanherib-Inschriften. Archiv für Orientforschung, Beiheft 26. Wien: Institut für Orientalistik der Universität.Google Scholar
Frahm, E. 2008. “The Great City: Nineveh in the Age of Sennacherib”. Bulletin of the Canadian Society for Mesopotamian Studies 3: 13–20.Google Scholar
Frankfort, H. 1952. “The Origin of the Bît Hilani”. Iraq 14: 120–31.Google Scholar
Fuchs, A. 1994. Die Inschriften Sargons II. aus Khorsabad. Göttingen: Cuvillier.Google Scholar
Garr, W. R. 2000. “‘Image’ and ‘Likeness’ in the Inscription from Tell Fakhariyeh”. Israel Exploration Journal 503–4: 227–34.Google Scholar
Gerardi, P. 1988. “Epigraphs and Assyrian Palace Reliefs: The Development of the Epigraphic Text”. Journal of Cuneiform Studies 40/1: 1–35.Google Scholar
Gilibert, A. 2011. Syro-Hittite Monumental Art and the Archaeology of Performance. Berliner Studien der Alten Welt 2. Berlin: de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillmann, N. 2008. “Le Bâtiment isolé de Khorsabad: Une nouvelle tentative de reconstitution”. Iraq 70: 41–50.Google Scholar
Haines, Richard C. 1971. Excavations in the Plain of Antioch. 2. The Structural Remains of the Later Phases. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Harmanşah, Ö. 2013. Cities and the Shaping of Memory in the Ancient Near East. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Harrison, T. P. 2009. “Neo-Hittites in the ‘Land of Palistin’”. Near Eastern Archaeology 72: 174–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, T. P. and Osborne, J. F. 2012. “Building XVI and the Neo-Assyrian Sacred Precinct at Tell Tayinat”. Journal of Cuneiform Studies 64: 125–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, J. D. 2000. Corpus of Hieroglyphic Luwian Inscriptions. Untersuchungen zur indogermanischen Sprach- und Kulturwissenschaft. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Heinrich, E. 1984. Die Paläste im alten Mesopotamien. Denkmäler antiker Architektur 15. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Jabr, M. 1997–98. “Notes on the Assyrian palace ‘Bit hilani’ in Nineveh”. Sumer 49: 154–65 (Arabic section).Google Scholar
Kertai, D. 2015a. The Architecture of Late Assyrian Royal Palaces. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kertai, D. 2015b. “The Guardians at the Gate. Entering the Southwest Palace in Nineveh”. Journal of Near Eastern Studies 74/2: 325–49.Google Scholar
Kertai, D. 2015c. “The Creatures that Protected the Doors of Nineveh during the Second Millennium BCE”. Mesopotamia 50: 147–56.Google Scholar
Kertai, D. forthcoming. “The Assyrian Influence on the Architecture of Hospitality in the Southern Levant”, in Faust, A. and Alster, S. Z., eds. The Southern Levant Under Assyrian Domination. Winona Lake: Eisenbrauns.Google Scholar
Koldewey, R. 1898. “Die Architektur von Sendschirli”, in von Luschan, F., ed. Ausgrabungen in Sendschirli. II Ausgrabungsbericht und Architektur. Berlin: W. Spemann.Google Scholar
Langenegger, F., Müller, K. and Naumann, R. 1950. Tell Halaf II: Die Bauwerke. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Layard, A. H. 1849. Nineveh and its Remains: With an Account of a Visit to the Chaldæan Christians of Kurdistan, and the Yezidis, or Devil-worshippers; and an Inquiry into the Manners and Arts of the Ancient Assyrians. New York: G. P. Putnam. Google Scholar
Layard, A. H. 1853. Discoveries among the Ruins of Nineveh and Babylon: with Travels in Armenia, Kurdistan, and the Desert: Being the Result of a Second Expedition Undertaken for the Trustees of the British Museum. London: Murray.Google Scholar
Lehmann, G. and Killebrew, A. E. 2010. “Palace 6000 at Megiddo in Context: Iron Age Central Hall Tetra-Partite Residencies and the Bīt-Hilāni Building Tradition in the Levant”. Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research 359: 13–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipschits, O. 2011. “The Origin and Date of the Volute Capitals from the Levant”, in Finkelstein, I. and Naʾaman, N., eds. The Fire Signals of Lachish: Studies in the Archaeology and History of Israel in the Late Bronze Age, Iron Age, and Persian Period in Honor of David Ussishkin. Winona Lake: Eisenbrauns. pp. 203–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loud, G. and Altman, C. B. 1938. Khorsabad, Part II, the Citadel and the Town. The University of Chicago Oriental Institute Publications 40. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Luckenbill, D. D. 1924. The Annals of Sennacherib. University of Chicago Oriental Institute Publications 2. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Luschan, F. v. 1911. Ausgrabungen in Sendschirli IV. Berlin: W. Spemann. Google Scholar
Mallowan, M. E. L. 1966. Nimrud and its Remains. London: Collins.Google Scholar
Matthews, D. M. 1990. Principles of Composition in Near Eastern Glyptic of the Later Second Millennium B.C. Orbis Biblicus et Orientalis 8. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Matthiae, P. 1999. Geschichte der Kunst im Alten Orient: die Großreiche der Assyrer, Neubabylonier und Achämeniden ; 1000–330 v. Chr. Stuttgart: Theiss.Google Scholar
Meinhold, W. 2009. Ištar in Aššur: Untersuchung eines Lokalkultes von ca. 2500 bis 614 v. Chr. Alter Orient und Altes Testament 367. Münster: Ugarit-Verlag.Google Scholar
Meissner, B. 1942. “Das bīt ḫilāni in Assyrien”. Orientalia 11: 251–61.Google Scholar
Menzel, B. 1981. Assyrische Tempel 1: Untersuchungen zu Kult, Administration und Personal. Studia Pohl, Series maior 10. Rome: Biblical Institute Press.Google Scholar
Meuszyński, J. 1976. “Neo-Assyrian Reliefs from the Central Area of Nimrud Citadel”. Iraq 38/1: 37–43.Google Scholar
Miglus, P. A. 2004. “Die Säule in Assyrien”, in Dercksen, J. G., ed. Assyria and Beyond: Studies Presented to Mogens Trolle Larsen. Leiden: Nederlands Instituut voor het Nabije Oosten. pp. 421–34.Google Scholar
Novák, M. 2004. “From Ashur to Nineveh: The Assyrian Town-planning Programme”. Iraq 66, Nineveh. Papers of the 49th Rencontre Assriologique Internationale: 177–85.Google Scholar
Orthmann, W. 1971. Untersuchungen zur späthethitischen Kunst. Saarbrücker Beiträge zür Altertumskunde 8. Saarbrücken: R. Habelt. Google Scholar
Orthmann, W. 1975. Der alte Orient. Berlin: Propyläen-Verlag.Google Scholar
Osborne, J. F. 2012. “Communicating Power in the Bīt-Ḫilāni Palace”. Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research 368: 29–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parpola, S. 2008. “Cuneiform texts from Ziyaret Tepe (Tušḫan), 2002–2003”. State Archives of Assyria Bulletin 17: 1–113.Google Scholar
Place, V. 1867. Ninive et l'Assyrie 3. Paris: Imprimerie Impériale.Google Scholar
Place, V. 1870. Ninive et l'Assyrie 2. Paris: Imprimerie Impériale.Google Scholar
Postgate, J. N. 1975. “Excavations in Iraq 1973–74”. Iraq 37/1: 56–67.Google Scholar
Postgate, J. N. 2004. “Palast A.V”, in Edzard, D. O. and Streck, M. P., eds. Reallexikon der Assyriologie und Vorderasiatischen Archäologie 10 . Berlin: de Gruyter. pp. 212‒26.Google Scholar
Postgate, J. N. and Reade, J. E. 1976–80. “Kalḫu”, in Edzard, D. O., ed. Reallexikon der Assyriologie und Vorderasiatischen Archäologie 5 . Berlin: de Gruyter. pp. 303–23.Google Scholar
Puchstein, O. 1892. “Die Säule in der assyrischen Architektur”. Jahrbuch des Kaiserlich Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts 7: 1–24.Google Scholar
Reade, J. E. 1964. “More drawings of Assurbanipal sculptures”. Iraq 26: 1–13.Google Scholar
Reade, J. E. 1979. “Narrative Composition in Assyrian Sculpture”. Baghdader Mitteilungen 10: 52–110.Google Scholar
Reade, J. E. 1998. “Assyrian Illustrations of Nineveh”. Iranica Antiqua 33: 81–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reade, J. E. 2002. “Shiru Maliktha and the Bandwai Canal System”, in Werr, L. a.-G., Curtis, J., Martin, H., McMahon, A., Oates, J. and Reade, J. E., eds. Of Pots and Plans: Papers on the Archaeology and History of Mesopatamia and Syria Presented to David Oates in Honour of his 75th Birthday. London: NABU Publications. pp. 309–18.Google Scholar
Reade, J. E. 2008. “Real and Imagined ‘Hittite Palaces’ at Khorsabad and Elsewhere”. Iraq 70: 13–40.Google Scholar
Singer, I. 1975. “Hittite ḫilammar and Hieroglyphic Luwian ḫilana ”. Zeitschrift für Assyriologie und vorderasiatische Archäologie 65/1: 69–103.Google Scholar
Singer, I. 1983. The Hittite KI.LAM Festival. Studien zu den Boğazköy-Texten 27–28. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz. Google Scholar
Stronach, D. 2012. “Urartu's Impact on Achaemenid and pre-Achaemenid architecture in Iran”, in Gruber, C., Hellwag, U., Kroll, S., Roaf, M. and Zimansky, P. E., eds. Biainili-Urartu: the Proceedings of the Symposium Held in Munich 12–14 October 2007. Leuven: Peeters. pp. 309–20.Google Scholar
Turner, G. 1970. “Tell Nebi Yūnus: The ekal māšarti of Nineveh”. Iraq 32/1: 68–85.Google Scholar
Turner, G. 1998. “The Architecture of the Palace”, in Barnett, R. D., Bleibtreu, E. and Turner, G., eds. Sculptures from the Southwest Palace of Sennacherib at Nineveh. London: British Museum Press. pp. 20–39.Google Scholar
Watanabe, C. E. 2002. Animal Symbolism in Mesopotamia: a Contextual Approach. Wien: Institut für Orientalistik der Universität Wien.Google Scholar
Weidhaas, H. 1939. “Der bīt hilāni ”. Zeitschrift für Assyriologie und vorderasiatische Archäologie 45: 108–68.Google Scholar
Winter, I. J. 1982. “Art as Evidence for Interaction: Relations between the Assyrian Empire and North Syria”, in Kühne, H., Nissen, H. J. and Renger, J., eds. Mesopotamien und seine Nachbarn: politische und kulturelle Wechselbeziehungen im Alten Vorderasien vom 4. - 1. Jahrtausend v. Chr.; XXV. Rencontre Assyriologique Internationale Berlin, 3. - 7. Juli 1978. Berliner Beiträge zum Vorderen Orient. Berlin: Reimer. pp. 355–82.Google Scholar
Winter, I. J. 1997. “Art in Empire: The Royal Image and the Visual Dimensions of Assyrian Ideology” in Parpola, S. and Whiting, R. M., eds. Assyria 1995: Proceedings of the 10th Anniversary Symposium of the Neo-Assyrian Text Corpus Project, Helsinki, September 7–11, 1995. Helsinki: Neo-Assyrian Text Corpus Project. pp. 359–81.Google Scholar
Winter, I. J. 2009. “What/When Is a Portrait? Royal Images of the Ancient Near East”. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 153/3: 254–70.Google Scholar