Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-r5zm4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-24T19:59:05.319Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Root Growth of Two Perennial Grass Types and Musk Thistle (Carduus nutans) in Temperate Grasslands of North America

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Chengchou Han  and
Stephen L. Young
Chengchou Han
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy and Horticulture, University of Nebraska–Lincoln, NE 68588
Stephen L. Young*
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy and Horticulture, West Central Research and Extension Center, University of Nebraska–Lincoln, 402 West State Farm Road, North Platte, NE 69101
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: steve.young@unl.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Root architecture of prairie grasslands, which depends on plant phenology and edaphic conditions, strongly influences susceptibility to invasion by nonindigenous plant species. Field studies were conducted to compare in situ root growth patterns of warm-season (WS) and cool-season (CS) perennial grasses and musk thistle during a 2-yr period that included a drought in the second year. In 2 yr, CS grasses had the highest amount of roots (1,296 m roots m−2 [395 ft roots ft−2]) across shallow (0 to 28 cm [0 to 11 in.]), medium (28 to 56 cm), and deep (56 to 98 cm) depths with 65% occurring in the shallow depths. However, roots of WS grasses were always greater at deeper depths compared to roots of CS grasses. The amount of new roots in CS grasses was statistically different in 2011 (F2,43 = 33.3, P < 0.0001) at all depths for vegetative (April to May), inflorescence (June), and dormant (July to November) stages. In 2012, the amount of new roots in CS and WS grasses was statistically different (F2,60 = 81.7, P < 0.0001 and F2,37 = 8.0, P = 0.0013), respectively, for vegetative (April to May), inflorescence (May to June), and dormant (June to November) stages. For both years, the amount of new roots in the CS grasses showed an interaction between the three growth stages and three soil depths (F2,62 = 33.3, P < 0.0001 [2011]; F4,60 = 18.6, P < 0.0001 [2012]). From germination to senescence, the total amount of musk thistle roots was 298 m roots m−2, which was less than the CS (1,296 m roots m−2) and WS (655 m roots m−2) grasses. The largest proportion of new musk thistle roots (61%) (F2,42 = 40.4, P < 0.0001) occurred during the bolting stage (April to June) of the second year. These results show the difference in root distribution of two grass types and the niches that are created underground by extraneous conditions (e.g., drought) in WS grass stands that may contribute to the establishment of musk thistle, an invasive plant species in many North American regions.

Keywords

Musk thistle, Carduus nutans L. CRUNUCool-season perennial grassdistributiondisturbancedroughtinvasionminirhizotronwarm-season perennial grass
Type
Research Article
Information
Invasive Plant Science and Management , Volume 7 , Issue 3 , September 2014 , pp. 387 - 397
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Aerts, R, Berendse, F, Klerk, N, Bakker, C (1989) Root production and root turnover in two dominant species of wet heathlands. Oecologia 81:374–378 10.1007/BF00377087Google Scholar
Anderson, B (2007) Establishing Dryland Forage Grasses. Extension Guide G1705. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska–Lincoln. 2 pGoogle Scholar
Beck, KG (1999) Biennial thistles. Pages 145–161 in Sheley, RL, Petroff, JK, eds. Biology and Management of Noxious Rangeland Weeds. Corvallis, OR Oregon State University Press Google Scholar
Berlinger, BP, Knapp, JA (1991) Impacts of the conservation reserve program in the central Great Plains. Pages 46–49 in Joyce, LA, Mitchell, JE, Skold, MD, eds. The Conservation Reserve—Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow. Washington, DC US Forest Service General Technical Report RM-203Google Scholar
Blank, RR, Morgan, T (2012) Suppression of Bromus tectorum L. by established perennial grasses: potential mechanisms—part one. Appl Environ Soil Sci 2012:1–9 10.1155/2012/632172Google Scholar
Bottoms, RM, Whitson, TD (1998) A systems approach for the management of Russian knapweed (Centaurea repens). Weed Technol 12:363–366 10.1017/S0890037X00043943Google Scholar
Canham, C, Froend, RH, Stock, WD, Davies, M (2012) Dynamics of phreatophyte root growth relative to a seasonally fluctuating water table in a Mediterranean-type environment. Oecologia 170:909–916 10.1007/s00442-012-2381-1Google Scholar
Daehler, CC (2003) Performance comparisons of co-occurring native and alien invasive plants: implications for conservation and restoration. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 34:183–211 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132403Google Scholar
DiTomaso, JM, Kyser, GB, Pirosko, CB (2003) Effect of light and density on yellow starthistle (Centaurea solstitialis) root growth and soil moisture use. Weed Sci 51:334–341 10.1614/0043-1745(2003)051[0334:EOLADO]2.0.CO;2Google Scholar
Drew, MC, Saker, LR (1975) Nutrient supply and the growth of the seminal root system in barley: II. Environ Exp Bot 26:79–90 10.1093/jxb/26.1.79Google Scholar
Eddy, TA, Moore, CM (1998) Effects of sericea lespedeza (Lespedeza cuneata [Dumont] G. Don) invasion on oak savannas in Kansas. Trans Wis Acad Sci Arts Lett 86:57–62 Google Scholar
Eggemeyer, KD, Awada, T, Harvey, FE, Wedin, DA, Zhou, X, Zanner, CW (2008) Seasonal changes in depth of water uptake for encroaching trees Juniperus virginiana and Pinus ponderosa and two dominant C4 grasses in a semiarid grassland. Tree Physiol 29:157–169 10.1093/treephys/tpn019Google Scholar
Feldman, I, McCarty, MK, Scifres, CJ (1968) Ecological and control studies of musk thistle. Weed Sci 16:1–4 10.1017/S004317450003037XGoogle Scholar
Fernandez, OA, Caldwell, MM (1975) Phenology and dynamics of root growth of three cool semi-desert shrubs under field conditions. J Ecol 63:703 10.2307/2258746Google Scholar
Fransen, SC, Collins, HP, Boydston, RA (2006) Perennial warm-season grasses for biofuels. Pages 147–154 in Proceedings of the Western Alfalfa and Forage Conference. Davis, CA University of California, Davis Google Scholar
Gist, GR, Smith, RM (1948) Root development of several common forage grasses to a depth of eighteen inches. J Am Soc Agron 40:1036–1042 10.2134/agronj1948.00021962004000110008xGoogle Scholar
Han, C, Young, SL (2014) Drought and grazing disturbances and resistance to invasion by warm- and cool-season perennial grasses. Ecol Restor 32:28–36 10.3368/er.32.1.28Google Scholar
Harris, CA (1977) Root phenology as a factor of competition among grass seedlings. J Range Manage 30:172–177 10.2307/3897461Google Scholar
Hild, AL, Karl, MG, Haferkamp, MR, Heitschmidt, RK (2001) Drought and grazing III: root dynamics and germinable seed bank. J Range Manag 54:292–298 10.2307/4003250Google Scholar
Hulbert, LC (1986) Fire effects on tallgrass prairie. Pages 138–142 in Clambey, GK, Pemble, RH, eds. The Prairie: Past, Present and Future. Fargo, ND University Center for Environmental Studies Google Scholar
Jackson, RB (1997) A global budget for fine root biomass, surface area, and nutrient contents. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 94:7362–7366 10.1073/pnas.94.14.7362Google Scholar
Jackson, RB, Lechowicz, MJ, Li, X, Mooney, HA (2001) Phenology, growth, and allocation in global terrestrial productivity. Pages 61–82 in Roy, J, Saugier, B, Mooney, HA, eds. Terrestrial Global Productivity. San Diego, CA Academic Press 10.1016/B978-012505290-0/50005-3Google Scholar
Johnson, MG, Tingey, DT, Phillips, DL, Storm, MJ (2001) Advancing fine root research with minirhizotrons. Environ Exp Bot 45:263–289 10.1016/S0098-8472(01)00077-6Google Scholar
Kitchen, DJ, Blair, JM, Callaham, MA. Jr (2009) Annual fire and mowing alter biomass, depth distribution, and C and N content of roots and soil in tallgrass prairie. Plant Soil 323:235–247 10.1007/s11104-009-9931-2Google Scholar
Kucera, CL, Dahlman, RC (1968) Root–rhizome relationships in fire-treated stands of big bluestem (Andropogon gerardi Vitman). Am Midl Nat 80:268–271 10.2307/2423615Google Scholar
Larreguy, C, Carrera, A, Bertiller, M (2012) Production and turnover rates of shallow fine roots in grass lands of the Patagonian Monte, Argentina. Ecol Res 27:61–68 10.1007/s11284-011-0869-5Google Scholar
Laufenberg, SM (2003) Restoring Russian Knapweed-Infested Riparian Areas. Ph.D Dissertation. Bozeman, MT Montana State University. 102 pGoogle Scholar
Leininger, WC (1988) Non-chemical alternatives for managing selected plant species in the western United States. Fort Collins, CO US Department of the Interior Rep XCM-118. 47 pGoogle Scholar
Liu, X, Huang, B (2005) Root physiological factors involved in cool-season grass response to high soil temperature. Environ Exp Bot 53:233–245 Google Scholar
Meisner, A, De Deyn, GB, de Boer, W, van der Putten, WH (2013) Soil biotic legacy effects of extreme weather events influence plant invasiveness Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110:9835–9838 10.1073/pnas.1300922110Google Scholar
Mico, MA, Shay, JM (2002) Effect of flea beetles (Aphthona nigriscutis) on prairie invaded by leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula) in Manitoba. Great Plains Res 12:167–184 Google Scholar
Payero, JO, Tarkalson, DD, Irmak, S, Davison, D, Petersen, JL (2008) Effect of irrigation amounts applied with subsurface drip irrigation on corn evapotranspiration, yield, water use efficiency, and dry matter production in a semiarid climate. Agric Water Manag 95:895–908 10.1016/j.agwat.2008.02.015Google Scholar
Qian, YL, Fry, JD, Upham, WS (1997) Rooting and drought avoidance of warm-season turfgrasses and tall fescue in Kansas. Crop Sci 37:905–910 10.2135/cropsci1997.0011183X003700030034xGoogle Scholar
Reeder, JD, Schuman, GE (2002) Influence of livestock grazing on C sequestration in semi-arid mixed-grass and short-grass grass lands. Environ Pollut 166:457–463 10.1016/S0269-7491(01)00223-8Google Scholar
Rees, NE, Littlefield, JL, Bruckart, WL, Baudoin, A (1996) Musk thistle: Carduus nutans . Pages 35–35 in Rees, NE, Quimby, PC, Piper, GL, Coombs, EM, Turner, CE, Spencer, NR, Knutson, LV, eds. Biological Control of Weeds in the West. Bozeman, MT: Western Society of Weed Science Google Scholar
Roeth, F, Melvin, SR, Schleufer, IL (2003) Noxious weeds of Nebraska: Musk thistle. Extension Publication EC-03-176. Lincoln, NE University of Nebraska–Lincoln. 2 pGoogle Scholar
Smith, MD, Knapp, AK (2001) Physiological and morphological traits of exotic, invasive exotic, and native plant species in tallgrass prairie. Int J Plant Sci 162:785–792 10.1086/320774Google Scholar
Steinaker, DF, Wilson, SD, Peltzer, DA (2010) Asynchronicity in root and shoot phenology in grasses and woody plants. Global Change Biol 16:2241–2251 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.02065.xGoogle Scholar
Suding, KN, Goldberg, DE, Hartman, KM (2003) Relationships among species traits: separating levels of response and identifying linkages to abundance. Ecology 84:1–14 10.1890/0012-9658(2003)084[0001:RASTSL]2.0.CO;2Google Scholar
Teskey, RO, Hinckley, TM (1981) Influence of temperature and water potential on root growth of white oak. Physiologia Plantarum 52:363–369 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1981.tb06055.xGoogle Scholar
Tierney, GL, Fahey, TJ, Groffman, PM, Hardy, JP, Fitzhugh, RD, Driscoll, CT, Yavitt, JB (2003) Environmental control of fine root dynamics in a northern hardwood forest. Global Change Biol 9:670–679 Google Scholar
Torrion, JA, Setiyono, TD, Cassman, KG, Ferguson, RB, Irmak, S, Specht, JE (2012) Soybean root development relative to vegetative and reproductive phenology. Agron J 104:1702–1709 Google Scholar
Tufekcioglu, A (1999) Fine root dynamics, coarse root biomass, root distribution, and soil respiration in a multispecies riparian buffer in Central Iowa, USA. Agrofor Syst 44:163–174 10.1023/A:1006221921806Google Scholar
[USDA] U. S. Department of Agriculture–Soil Conservation Service (1978) Soil survey of Lincoln County, Nebraska. Washington, D.C. U.S. Department of Agriculture. 128 pGoogle Scholar
Weaver, JE (1954) North American Prairie. Lincoln, NE Johnsen Publishing Company. 357 pGoogle Scholar
Weaver, JE, Clements, FE (1938) Plant Ecology. 2nd edn. New York McGraw-Hill Book Co. 402 pGoogle Scholar
Weaver, JE, Darland, RW (1949) Quantitative study of root systems in different soil types. Science 110:164–165 10.1126/science.110.2850.164Google Scholar
Xu, Q, Huang, B (2000) Growth and physiological responses of creeping bentgrass to changes in air and soil temperatures. Crop Sci 40:1363–1368 Google Scholar
Young, SL, Kyser, GB, Barney, JN, Claassen, VP, DiTomaso, JM (2010) Spatio-temporal relationship between water depletion and root distribution patterns of Centaurea solstitialis and two native perennials. Restor Ecol 18:323–333 Google Scholar
Young, SL, Kyser, GB, Barney, JN, Claassen, VP, DiTomaso, JM (2011) The role of light and soil moisture in plant community resistance to invasion by yellow starthistle (Centaurea solstitialis). Restor Ecol 19:599–606 10.1111/j.1526-100X.2010.00686.xGoogle Scholar
Zavaleta, ES, Hulvey, KB (2007) Realistic variation in species composition affects grassland production, resource use and invasion resistance. Plant Ecol 188:39–51 10.1007/s11258-006-9146-zGoogle Scholar