No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Influence of institutional arrangements on invasive plant species management from multilevel perspectives: a case study in Vietnam’s national parks
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 June 2022
Abstract
Invasive plant species (IPS) management in national parks is a complex problem often characterized by the involvement of various organizations with different responsibilities, legal mandates, and jurisdictions. These institutional arrangements shape the structure, function, and decision-making behaviors of organizations and influence management effectiveness. Drawing on institutional theory, this study analyzed institutional arrangements and how these influenced IPS management in Vietnam’s national parks. Data were collected between May and July 2017 using in-depth interviews with 39 key informants with responsibility for IPS management at different institutional levels (national, provincial, and local national parks). Results demonstrated that IPS management in Vietnam’s national parks was characterized by centralized management with overlaps and gaps in vertical institutional relationships that limited the effectiveness of horizontal relationships. These characteristics resulted in a lack of clear guiding regulations and limited resources that restricted decision making and hindered implementation at the local national park level. The study highlights the need for a common set of principles across agencies, governed by an overarching body to promote constructive relationships across the vertical and horizontal institutional dimensions of IPS management.
Keywords
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Weed Science Society of America
Footnotes
Associate Editor: Jacob N. Barney, Virginia Tech
References
Abrams, RW, Anwana, ED, Ormsby, A, Dovie, DB, Ajagbe, A, Abrams, A (2009) Integrating top-down with bottom-up conservation policy in Africa. Biol Conserv 23:799–804
10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01285.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Adam, C, Hurka, S, Knill, C, Peters, BG, Steinebach, Y (2019) Introducing vertical policy coordination to comparative policy analysis: the missing link between policy production and implementation. J Comp Policy Anal 21:499–517
Google Scholar
Berkes, F (2002) Cross-scale institutional linkages: perspectives from the bottom up. Pages 293–321 in Ostrom, EE, Dietz, TE, Dolšak, NE, Stern, PC, Stonich, SE, Weber, EU, eds. The Drama of the Commons. Washington, DC: National Academies Press
Google Scholar
Burgers, J, Vranken, J (2003) How to Make a Successful Urban Development Programme. Experiences from 9 European Countries. Antwerp: Garant. 67 pGoogle Scholar
Christensen, T, Lægreid, P, Rykkja, LH (2015) The challenges of coordination in national security management—the case of the terrorist attack in Norway. Int Rev Adm Sci 81:352–372
10.1177/0020852314564307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, M, Ma, Z, Snyder, SA, Hennes, EP (2021) Understanding invasive plant management on family forestlands: an application of protection motivation theory. J Environ Manag 286:112161
10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112161CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cosens, B (2010) Transboundary river governance in the face of uncertainty: resilience theory and the Columbia River Treaty. J Land Res Environ Law 30:229
Google Scholar
Dayer, AA, Redford, KH, Campbell, KJ, Dickman, CR, Epanchin-Niell, RS, Grosholz, ED, Hallac, DE, Leslie, EF, Richardson, LA, Schwartz, MW (2020) The unaddressed threat of invasive animals in US National Parks. Biol Invasions 22:177–188
10.1007/s10530-019-02128-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Queiroz, J, Griswold, D, Nguyen, D, Hall, P (2013) Vietnam Tropical Forest and Biodiversity Assessment. Quito, Ecuador: USAID Vietnam. 79 pGoogle Scholar
de Wit, J (2007) Decentralisation, Local Governance and Community Participation in Vietnam. Research Reports of the VASS/ISS Capacity Building Project. The Hague, The Netherlands: Institute of Social Studies. 22 pGoogle Scholar
Elo, S, Kyngäs, H (2008) The qualitative content analysis process. J Adv Nurs 62:107–115
10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Forest Trends (2013) Legal Framework for Mangrove Forest Carbon Payments for Ecosystem Services in Viet Nam—A Case Study of Xuan Thuy National Park, Giao Thuy District, Nam Dinh Province. Washington, DC: Forest Trends. 27 pGoogle Scholar
Foxcroft, LC, McGeoch, M (2011) Implementing invasive species management in an adaptive management framework. Koedoe 53:105–115
10.4102/koedoe.v53i2.1006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foxcroft, LC, Pyšek, P, Richardson, DM, Genovesi, P, MacFadyen, S (2017) Plant invasion science in protected areas: progress and priorities. Biol Invasions 19:1353–1378
10.1007/s10530-016-1367-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fritzen, SA (2006) Probing system limits: decentralisation and local political accountability in Vietnam. Asia Pac J Public Adm 28:1–23
Google Scholar
Gelderblom, CM, van Wilgen, BW, Nel, JL, Sandwith, T, Botha, M, Hauck, M (2003) Turning strategy into action: implementing a conservation action plan in the Cape Floristic Region. Biol Conserv 112:291–297
10.1016/S0006-3207(02)00399-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilfillan, D, Nguyen, TT, Pham, HT (2017) Coordination and health sector adaptation to climate change in the Vietnamese Mekong Delta. Ecol Soc 22(3):14
10.5751/ES-09235-220314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Given, LM (2008) The Sage Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. 1072 p10.4135/9781412963909CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, S (2019) Coordinating invasive plant management among conservation and rural stakeholders. Land Use Policy 81:247–255
10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.10.043CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helmke, G, Levitsky, S (2004) Informal institutions and comparative politics: a research agenda. Perspect Politics 2:725–740
10.1017/S1537592704040472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henwood, K, Pidgeon, N (2001) Talk about woods and trees: threat of urbanization, stability, and biodiversity. J Environ Psychol 21:125–147
10.1006/jevp.2000.0196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ho, TVT, Woodley, S, Cottrell, A, Valentine, P (2014) A multilevel analytical framework for more-effective governance in human-natural systems: a case study of marine protected areas in Vietnam. Ocean Coast Manag 90:11–19Google Scholar
Hoe, ND (2011) Alarming the Outspread of Merremia boisiana. http://vacne.org.vn/canh-bao-loai-day-leo-nguy-hiem-bim-boi-dang-lan-rong/25527.html Accessed: June 25, 2022. In VietnameseGoogle Scholar
Hollingsworth, JR (2000) Doing institutional analysis: implications for the study of innovations. Rev Int Polit Econ 7:595–64410.1080/096922900750034563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooghe, L, Marks, G (2003) Unraveling the central state, but how? Types of multi-level governance. Am Polit Sci Rev 97:233–243
Google Scholar
Howes, M, Wortley, L, Potts, R, Dedekorkut-Howes, A, Serrao-Neumann, S, Davidson, J, Smith, T, Nunn, P (2017) Environmental sustainability: a case of policy implementation failure? Sustainability 9:165
10.3390/su9020165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, M, Jones, T, Phau, I (2016) Community perceptions of a World Heritage nomination process: the Ningaloo Coast Region of Western Australia. Coastal Manag 44:139–155
10.1080/08920753.2016.1135275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humair, F, Edwards, PJ, Siegrist, M, Kueffer, C (2014) Understanding misunderstandings in invasion science: why experts don’t agree on common concepts and risk assessments. NeoBiota 20:1–30
10.3897/neobiota.20.6043CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ikin, R (2002) International conventions, national policy and legislative responsibility for alien invasive species in the Pacific islands. Micronesica Suppl 6:123–128
Google Scholar
[ICEM] International Centre for Environmental Management, AU (2003) Vietnam National Report on Protected Areas and Development. Review of Protected Areas and Development in the Lower Mekong River Region. Queensland, Australia: Indooroopilly. 60 pGoogle Scholar
[IUCN] International Union for Conservation of Nature (2021) The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2021-3. https://www.iucnredlist.org. Accessed: March 22, 2022Google Scholar
Jacob, K, Volkery, A (2004) Institutions and instruments for government self-regulation: environmental policy integration in a cross-country perspective. J Comp Policy Anal 6:291–309
Google Scholar
Jauni, M, Ramula, S (2017) Demographic mechanisms of disturbance and plant diversity promoting the establishment of invasive Lupinus polyphyllus. J Plant Ecol 10:510–517
Google Scholar
Jordana, J, Sancho, D (2004) Regulatory designs, institutional constellations and the study of the regulatory state. Pages 296–318 in Jordana, J, Levi-Faur, D, eds. The Politics of Regulation: Institutions and Regulatory Reforms for the Age of Governance. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar
Google Scholar
Kaiser, BA (2006) On the garden path: an economic perspective on prevention and control policies for an invasive species. Choices 21:139–142
Google Scholar
Kim, JH, Keane, TD, Bernard, EA (2015) Fragmented local governance and water resource management outcomes. J Environ Manag 150:378–386
10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.12.002CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
KimDung, N, Bush, SR, Mol, AP (2017) The Vietnamese Legal and Policy Framework for Co-management in Special-Use Forests. Forests 8:262
10.3390/f8070262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleinschroth, F, Healey, JR (2017) Impacts of logging roads on tropical forests. Biotropica 49:620–635
10.1111/btp.12462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kokotovich, AE, Andow, DA (2017) Exploring tensions and conflicts in invasive species management: the case of Asian carp. Environ Sci Policy 69:105–112
10.1016/j.envsci.2016.12.016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le, B, Nguyen, T, Adkins, S (2012) Damage caused by Merremia eberhardtii and Merremia boisiana to biodiversity of Da Nang City, Vietnam. Pak J Weed Sci Res 18:895–905
Google Scholar
Lee, T-R, Cheng-Jen, L, Phusavat, K, Sinnarong, N (2011) Vertical integration in the Taiwan aquaculture industry. Manag Glob Transit 9:393
Google Scholar
Lien, BB (2011) Legal interpretation and the Vietnamese version of the rule of law. National Taiwan University Law Review 6:321
Google Scholar
Lindquist, E (2006) Organizing for policy implementation: the emergence and role of implementation units in policy design and oversight. J Comp Policy Anal 8:311–324
Google Scholar
Lopian, R (2005) The International Plant Protection Convention and invasive alien species. Pages 6–16 in Proceedings of Identification of Risks and Management of Invasive Alien Species Using IPPC Framework Workshop. Braunschweig, Germany: IPPC SecretariatGoogle Scholar
Lozon, JD, MacIsaac, HJ (1997) Biological invasions: are they dependent on disturbance? Environ Rev 5:131–144
10.1139/a97-007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ma, Z, Clarke, M, Church, SP (2018) Insights into individual and cooperative invasive plant management on family forestlands. Land Use Policy 75:682–693
10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.02.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacLeod, A, Pautasso, M, Jeger, MJ, Haines-ả, R (2010) Evolution of the international regulation of plant pests and challenges for future plant health. Food Secur 2:49–70
10.1007/s12571-010-0054-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahla, N, Mlambo, D (2019) Influence of two co-occurring invasive plant species on resident woody species and surface soil properties in Chipinge Safari Area, Zimbabwe. Trop Ecol 60:129–139
10.1007/s42965-019-00016-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matheson, C (2000) Policy formulation in Australian government: vertical and horizontal axes. Aust J Public Adm 59:44–55
10.1111/1467-8500.00150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendes, AMC (2013) How to Cope with the “Silo Effect” in the Public Sector as a Deterrent to Social Innovation: The Case of NPISA Porto. The Theoretical, Empirical and Policy Foundations for Building Social Innovation in Europe. FP7-SSH-2011-2-290711. Brussels: European Commission, DG ResearchGoogle Scholar
Mittermeier, RA, Gil, PR, Hoffman, M, Pilgrim, J, Brooks, T, Mittermeier, CG, Brooks, T, Lamoreux, J, Da Fonseca, GA (2004) Hotspots Revisited: Earth’s Biologically Richest and Most Endangered Terrestrial Ecoregions. Mexico City: Cemex. 392 pGoogle Scholar
Neuman, WL (2013) Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Harlow, UK: Pearson Education. 599 pGoogle Scholar
North, D (1990) Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 152 p10.1017/CBO9780511808678CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nunan, F, Campbell, A, Foster, E (2012) Environmental mainstreaming: the organisational challenges of policy integration. Public Adm Dev 32:262–277
10.1002/pad.1624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostrom, E (1986) An agenda for the study of institutions. Public Choice 48:3–25
10.1007/BF00239556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostrom, E (1990) Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 280 p10.1017/CBO9780511807763CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paavola, J, Gouldson, A, Kluvánková-Oravská, T (2009) Interplay of actors, scales, frameworks and regimes in the governance of biodiversity. Environ Policy Gov 19:148–158
10.1002/eet.505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pilgrim, J, Tu, ND (2007) Background Paper on Threatened and Alien Species in Vietnam and Recommendations for the Content of the Biodiversity Law. Report to the Department of Environment, Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment. Hanoi: BirdLife International Vietnam Programme. 83 pGoogle Scholar
Reyes-García, V, Paneque-Gálvez, J, Bottazzi, P, Luz, AC, Gueze, M, Macía, MJ, Orta-Martínez, M, Pacheco, P (2014) Indigenous land reconfiguration and fragmented institutions: a historical political ecology of Tsimane’lands (Bolivian Amazon). J Rural Stud 34:282–291
10.1016/j.jrurstud.2014.02.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodgers, L, Pernas, T, Redwine, J, Shamblin, B, Bruscia, S (2018) Multiscale invasive plant monitoring: experiences from the greater Everglades restoration area. Weed Technol 32:11–19
10.1017/wet.2017.106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruijer, E (2012) Social equity, policy intentions and unanticipated outcomes: a comparative analysis of work– life balance policies. J Comp Policy Anal 14:311–329
Google Scholar
Schelhas, J, Alexander, A, Brunson, M, Cabe, T, Crall, A, Dockry, MJ, Emery, MR, Frankel, SJ, Hapner, N, Hickman, CR, Jordan, R, LaVoie, MJ, Ma, Z, Starinchak, J, Vukomanovic, J (2021) Social and cultural dynamics of non-native invasive species. Pages 267–291 in Poland, TM, Patel-Weynand, T, Finch, DM, Miniat, CF, Hayes, DC, Lopez, VM, eds. Invasive Species in Forests and Rangelands of the United States. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45367-1_12
CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, R, Le Corre, N, Hughes, M, Peuziat, I (2020) The view from the inside: institutional dimensions of public communication of two coastal and marine protected area networks in France. Coastal Manage 48:210–231
10.1080/08920753.2020.1754088CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schüttler, E, Rozzi, R, Jax, K (2011) Towards a societal discourse on invasive species management: a case study of public perceptions of mink and beavers in Cape Horn. J Nat Conserv 19:175–184
10.1016/j.jnc.2010.12.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwörer, T, Federer, R, Ferren, H, Center, AS (2012) Managing Invasive Species: How Much Do We Spend? Seward: Alaska SeaLife Center. 4 pGoogle Scholar
Scott, WR (2013) Institutions and Organizations: Ideas, Interests, and Identities. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. 360 pGoogle Scholar
Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity (2001) Review of the Efficiency and Efficacy of Existing Legal Instruments Applicable to Invasive Alien Species. CBD Technical Series No. 2. Montreal: SCBDGoogle Scholar
Selge, S, Fischer, A, van der Wal, R (2011) Public and professional views on invasive non-native species—a qualitative social scientific investigation. Biol Conserv 144:3089–3097
10.1016/j.biocon.2011.09.014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shackleton, RT, Foxcroft, LC, Pyšek, P, Wood, LE, Richardson, DM (2020) Assessing biological invasions in protected areas after 30 years: revisiting nature reserves targeted by the 1980s SCOPE programme. Biol Conserv 243:108424
10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shackleton, RT, Le Maitre, DC, van Wilgen, BW, Richardson, DM (2016) Identifying barriers to effective management of widespread invasive alien trees: Prosopis species (mesquite) in South Africa as a case study. Global Environ Change 38:183–194
10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.03.012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shine, C, Williams, N, Burhenne-Guilmin, F (2005) Legal and institutional frameworks for invasive alien species. Pages 233–283 in Mooney HA, Mack R, McNeely JA, Neville LE, Schei PJ, Waage JK, eds. Invasive Alien Species: A New Synthesis. Washington, DC: Island PressGoogle Scholar
Sievanen, L, Leslie, HM, Wondolleck, JM, Yaffee, SL, McLeod, KL, Campbell, LM (2011) Linking top-down and bottom-up processes through the new US National Ocean Policy. Conserv Lett 4:298–303
10.1111/j.1755-263X.2011.00178.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steurer, R (2007) From government strategies to strategic public management: an exploratory outlook on the pursuit of cross-sectoral policy integration. Eur Environ 17:201–214
10.1002/eet.452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stokes, KE, Montgomery, WI, Dick, JTA, Maggs, CA, McDonald, RA (2006) The importance of stakeholder engagement in invasive species management: a cross-jurisdictional perspective in Ireland. Biodivers Conserv 15:2829–2852
10.1007/s10531-005-3137-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tan, DT, Thu, PQ, Dell, B (2012) Invasive plant species in the national parks of Vietnam. Forests 3:997–1016
10.3390/f3040997CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tobin, PC (2018) Managing invasive species. F1000Research 7. DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.15414.1
10.12688/f1000research.15414.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Triet, T, Man, LC, Nga, NP (2004) Impacts of Mimosa pigra on native plants and soil insect ommunities in Tram Chim National Park, Vietnam. Pages 45–51 in Julien M, Flanagan G, Heard T, Hennecke B, Paynter Q, Wilson C, eds. Research and Management of Mimosa pigra. Canberra, Australia: CSIRO EntomologyGoogle Scholar
Truong, TAT (2019) Risks, Impacts and Management of Invasive Plant Species in Vietnam. Ph.D dissertation. Murdoch, WA, Australia: Murdoch University. 244 pGoogle Scholar
Truong, TTA, Andrew, ME, Hardy, GSJ, Pham, TQ, Nguyen, QH, Dell, B (2021) Impact of a native invasive weed (Microstegium ciliatum) on regeneration of a tropical forest. Plant Ecol 222:173–191
10.1007/s11258-020-01097-yCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaas, J, Driessen, PPJ, Giezen, M, van Laerhoven, F, Wassen, MJ (2017) Who’s in charge here anyway? Polycentric governance configurations and the development of policy on invasive alien species in the semisovereign Caribbean. Ecol Soc 22:1
10.5751/ES-09487-220401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vardarman, J, Berchová-Bímová, K, Pěknicová, J (2018) The role of protected area zoning in invasive plant management. Biodivers Conserv 27:1811–1829
10.1007/s10531-018-1508-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vo, DH (2005) Fiscal Decentralisation in Vietnam: A Preliminary Investigation. Perth: Department of Economics, University of Western Australia
Google Scholar
Waibel, G (2010) State Management in Transition: Understanding Water Resources Management in Vietnam. ZEF Working Paper Series No. 55. Bonn: University of Bonn, Center for Development Research (ZEF). 60 pGoogle Scholar
Wallace, C (2009) Optimising horizontal and vertical partnership connections: bringing partnerships together to create a network advantage. Aust J Prim Health 15:196–202
10.1071/PY09002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walsh, SJ, McCleary, AL, Mena, CF, Shao, Y, Tuttle, JP, González, A, Atkinson, R (2008) QuickBird and Hyperion data analysis of an invasive plant species in the Galapagos Islands of Ecuador: implications for control and land use management. Remote Sens Environ 112:1927–1941
10.1016/j.rse.2007.06.028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wells, MP (1998) Institutions and incentives for biodiversity conservation. Biodivers Conserv 7:815–835
10.1023/A:1008896620848CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, JR, Panetta, FD, Lindgren, C (2016) Detecting and Responding to Alien Plant Incursions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
10.1017/CBO9781316155318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zingerli, C (2005) Colliding understandings of biodiversity conservation in Vietnam: global claims, national interests, and local struggles. Soc Nat Resour 18:733–747
10.1080/08941920591005151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Truong et al. supplementary material
Truong et al. supplementary material
File
16.6 KB