Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-544b6db54f-rlmms Total loading time: 0.247 Render date: 2021-10-22T11:10:04.341Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Community-Level Waterbird Responses to Water Hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Amy M. Villamagna*
Affiliation:
Sustainable Development and Conservation Biology Program, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742
Brian R. Murphy
Affiliation:
Department of Fish and Wildlife Conservation, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061
Sarah M. Karpanty
Affiliation:
Department of Fish and Wildlife Conservation, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: amv@vt.edu

Extract

Water hyacinth is among the most widespread invasive plants worldwide; however, its effects on waterbirds are largely undocumented. We monitored site use by waterbirds at Lake Chapala, the largest lake in Mexico and recently designated Ramsar site, to evaluate the potential influence of water hyacinth cover on species composition and aggregate measures of the waterbird community, including waterbird density, species richness, and Simpson's index of diversity. We examined the response of waterbirds to changes in percent water hyacinth cover at 22 independent sites around the lake during six study seasons from May 2006 to February 2008. We found little evidence to suggest that percent water hyacinth cover affected aggregate community measures; however, multivariate analysis of relative species composition suggested that water hyacinth cover corresponded with seasonal species composition (Canonical Correspondence r = 0.66, P = 0.007) when seasonal site cover averaged 17.7 ± 4.67% (winter 2007). Several migratory species were not observed during this season, which could suggest that some small-bodied migratory species avoided Lake Chapala during the winter of high water hyacinth cover. We suspect that observed changes in the waterbird community are in response to species-specific tolerances for water hyacinth and indirect abiotic and biotic effects of its presence (e.g., invertebrate and fish composition).

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abdi, H. and Williams, L. 2010. Tukey's Honestly Significant Difference (HSD) test. Pages 15 in Salkind, N., ed. Encyclopedia of Research Design. Thousand Oaks, CA Sage.Google Scholar
Audubon, . 2012. What are waterbirds? http://web4.audubon.org/bird/waterbirds/what_Are_Waterbirds.html. Accessed: March 2, 2012.Google Scholar
Bailey, R. G. and Litterick, M. R. 1993. The macroinvertebrate fauna of water hyacinth fringes in the Sudd Swamps (River Nile, Southern Sudan). Hydrobiologia 250:97103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartodziej, W. and Weymouth, G. 1995. Waterbird abundance and activity on water-hyacinth and Egeria in the St-Marks River, Florida. J. Aquat. Plant Manag. 33:1922.Google Scholar
Brendonck, L., Maes, J., Rommens, W., Dekeza, N., Nhiwatiwa, T., Barson, M., Callebaut, V., Phiri, C., Moreau, K., Gratwicke, B., Stevens, M., Alyn, N., Holsters, E., Ollevier, F., and Marshall, B. 2003. The impact of water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) in a eutrophic subtropical impoundment (Lake Chivero, Zimbabwe). II. Species diversity. Arch Hydrobiol. 158:389405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, S. J. and Maceina, M. J. 2002. The influence of disparate levels of submersed aquatic vegetation on largemouth bass population characteristics in a Georgia reservoir. J. Aquat. Plant Manag. 40:2835.Google Scholar
Buckley, Y. M. 2008. The role of research for integrated management of invasive species, invaded landscapes and communities. J. Appl. Ecol. 45:397402.Google Scholar
CEA-Jalisco. 2012. Lago de Chapala. http://www.ceajalisco.gob.mx/chapala.html. Accessed: February 20, 2012.Google Scholar
Center, T. D. 1994. Biological control of weeds: water hyacinth and water lettuce. Pages 481521 in Rosen, D., Bennett, F. D., and Capinera, J. L., eds. Pest Management in the Subtropics: Biological Control—A Florida Perspective. Andover, UK Intercept.Google Scholar
Commission for Environmental Cooperation. 2010. 2005 North American Land Cover at 250-m Spatial Resolution. http://www.cec.org/. Accessed: November 5, 2010.Google Scholar
Crowder, L. B. and Cooper, W. E. 1982. Habitat structural complexity and the interaction between bluegills and their prey. Ecology 63:18021813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Custer, T. W. and Osborn, R. G. 1978. Feeding habitat use by colonially breeding herons, egrets, and ibises in North Carolina. Auk 95:733743.Google Scholar
Davalos-Lind, L. and Lind, O. 2001. Phytoplankton and bacteriaplankton production and trophic relations in Lake Chapala. Pages 199214 in van Afferden, M., and Hansen, A., eds. The Lerma-Chapala Watershed: Evaluation and Management. New York Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dray, S. and Dufour, A. 2007. The ade4 package: implementing the duality diagram for ecologists. J. Stat. Software 22(4):120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esler, D. 1992. Habitat use by piscivorous birds on a power-plant cooling reservoir. J. Field Ornithol. 63:241249.Google Scholar
ESRI. 2009. ArcGIS Desktop: Release 9.3.1. Redlands, CA Environmental Systems Research Institute.Google Scholar
Gurevitch, J. and Padilla, D. 2004. Are invasive species a major cause of extinctions? Trends Ecol. Evol. 19:470474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayhoe, K., Wake, C., Huntington, T., Luo, L., Schwartz, M., Sheffield, J., Wood, E., Anderson, B., Bradbudy, J., DeGaetano, A., Troy, T., and Wolfe, D. 2006. Past and future changes in climate and hydrological indicators in the U.S. Northeast. Clim. Dynam. 28:381407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hepworth, G. and Hamilton, A. 2001. Scan sampling and waterfowl activity budget studies: design and analysis considerations. Behaviour 138:13911405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krebs, C., ed. 1999. Ecological Methodology. New York Addison-Wesley Educational Publishers. 624 p.Google Scholar
Kushlan, J. A. 1978. Feeding ecology of wading birds. Pages 249297 in Sprunt, A. IV, Ogden, J., and Winckler, S., eds. Wading Birds. New York National Audubon Society.Google Scholar
Lind, O. and Davalos-Lind, L. 2001. Introduction to the limnology of Lake Chapala, Jalisco, Mexico. Pages 139149 in van Afferden, M., and Hansen, A., eds. The Lerma-Chapala Watershed: Evaluation and Management. New York Kluwer.Google Scholar
Lira-Noriega, A., Laborde, A., Guevara, S., Sanchez-Rios, G., Zuur, G., and Ieno, A. 2007. Canonical correspondence analysis of lowland pasture vegetation in the humid tropics of Mexico. Pages 561574 in Zuur, A., Ieno, E., and Smith, G., eds. Analysing Ecological Data. New York Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lopez, E. G. 1993. Effect of glyphosate on different densities of water hyacinth. J. Aquat. Plant Manag. 31:255257.Google Scholar
Lu, J., Wu, J., Fu, Z., and Zhu, L. 2007. Water hyacinth in China: a sustainability science-based management framework. Environ. Manag. 40:823830.Google ScholarPubMed
Martinez, C. 2004. Food and niche overlap of the scarlet ibis and the yellow-crowned night heron in a tropical mangrove swamp. Waterbirds 27(1):18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martinez-Jimenez, M. and Gomez-Balandra, M. 2007. Integrated control of Eichhornia crassipes by using insects and plant pathogens in Mexico. Crop Prot. 26:12341238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masifwa, W., Twongo, T., and Denny, P. 2001. The impact of water hyacinth, Eichhornia crassipes (Mart.) Solms on the abundance and diversity of aquatic macroinvertebrates along the shores of northern Lake Victoria, Uganda. Hydrobiologia 452:7988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Master, T., Leiser, J., Bennett, K., Bretsch, J., and Wolfe, H. 2005. Patch selection by snowy egrets. Waterbirds 28:220224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCune, B. 2002. PC-Ord. Glenenden Beach, OR: MjM Software Design. Millenium Ecosystem Assessment. 2005. Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Synthesis. Washington, DC World Resources Institute. 137 p.Google Scholar
Miranda, L. E. and Hodges, K. B. 2000. Role of aquatic vegetation coverage on hypoxia and sunfish abundance in bays of a eutrophic reservoir. Hydrobiologia 427(1–3):5157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, M., Lancia, R., and Gerwin, J. 2001. Using landscape-level data to predict the distribution of birds on a managed forest: effects of scale. Ecol. Appl. 11:16921708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, M. S., Rutzmoser, S. H., Wigley, T. B., Loehle, C., Gerwin, J. A., Keyser, P. D., Lancia, R. A., Perry, R. W., Reynolds, C. J., Thill, R. E., Weih, R., White, D., and Wood, P. B. 2006. Relationships between avian richness and landscape structure at multiple scales using multiple landscapes. For. Ecol. Manag. 221:159161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murkin, H. R., Murkin, E. J., and Ball, J. P. 1997. Avian habitat selection and prairie wetland dynamics: a 10-year experiment. Ecol. Appl. 7:11441159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perna, C. and Burrows, D. 2005. Improved dissolved oxygen status following removal of exotic weed mats in important fish habitat lagoons of the tropical Burdekin River floodplain, Australia. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 51:138148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pino, J., Roda, F., Ribas, J., and X Pons, . 2000. Relationships between avian richness and landscape structure at multiple scales using multiple landscapes: implications for conservation in rural areas between natural parks. Landsc. Urban Plan. 49:3548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramsar, . 2011. Lake Chapala. Ramsar Site Database. http://ramsar.wetlands.org/Database/Searchforsites/tabid/765/Default.aspx. Accessed: March 2, 2012.Google Scholar
Rehm, E. M. and Baldassarre, G. A. 2007. The influence of interspersion on marsh bird abundance in New York. Wilson J. Ornithol. 119:648654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
R Development Core Team. 2011. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. SAS. 2010. SAS JMP® 9. Cary, NC SAS Institute Inc.Google Scholar
Savino, J. F., Marschall, E. A., and Stein, R. A. 1992. Bluegill growth as modified by plant-density—an exploration of underlying mechanisms. Oecologia 89:153160.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tabachnick, B. G. and Fidell, L. S. 2007. Using Multivariate Statistics. 5th ed. Boston, MA Allyn and Bacon. 746 p.Google Scholar
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2008. Effects of Climate Change on Aquatic Invasive Species and Implications for Management and Research. Washington, DC US EPA, Office of Research and Development. 337 p.Google Scholar
Villamagna, A. M. and Murphy, B. R. 2010. Ecological and socio-economic impacts of invasive water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes): a review. Freshw. Biol. 55:282298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Villamagna, A., Murphy, B., and Trauger, D. 2010. American Coot (Fulica americana) behavioral response to an invasive freshwater plant, Eichhornia crassipes . Waterbirds 33:550555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warnes, G., Bolker, B., Gorjanc, G., Grothendieck, G., Korosec, A., Lumley, T., MacQueen, D., Magnusson, A., Rogers, J., and others, . 2011. gdata: Various R Programming Tools for Data Manipulation. R package. Version 2.8.2. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=gdata. Accessed: February 20, 2012.Google Scholar
Weller, M. and Spatcher, C. 1965. Role of habitat in the distribution and abundance of marsh birds. Special Report of the Iowa State University Agricultural Experimental Station 43:131.Google Scholar
Wicker, A. and Endres, K. 1995. Relationship between waterfowl and American coot abundance with submersed macrophytic vegetation in Currituck Sound, North Carolina. Estuaries Coasts 18:428431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Community-Level Waterbird Responses to Water Hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes)
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Community-Level Waterbird Responses to Water Hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes)
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Community-Level Waterbird Responses to Water Hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes)
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *