Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-dtkg6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-24T18:06:04.140Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Overlapping consensus view of human rights: a Rawlsian conception

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 October 2022

Ranjoo Seodu Herr Open the ORCID record for Ranjoo Seodu Herr [Opens in a new window]
Ranjoo Seodu Herr*
Affiliation:
Philosophy Department, Bentley University, 175 Forest Street, Waltham, MA 02452-4705, USA
*
Author for correspondence: Ranjoo Seodu Herr, E-mail: rherr@bentley.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper advances and defends the overlapping consensus view of human rights (OCV) as a political conception of human rights most consistent with John Rawls's normative account of a realistic utopia at the international level. Although some clues exist in The Law of Peoples to support this view, an innovative reconstruction is called for to complete the picture. This paper aims to offer such a reconstruction, which is predicated on two premises: first, the parties to the international original positions, which include decent nonliberal peoples (DNPs), are reasonable and worthy of liberal toleration; and, second, the protection of human rights proper is a module that can fit into all acceptable comprehensive doctrines at the international level, including societal comprehensive doctrines in DNPs. The first premise has been subjected to vehement liberal critiques and left for dead, and the second premise has not been taken seriously and relatively neglected. This paper defends these premises in turn to justify the OCV as constitutive of Rawls's normative account of a realistic utopia at the international level.

Keywords

Decent nonliberal peopleshuman rights propermoral group membersoverlapping consensus view of human rightsrealistic utopiasocietal comprehensive doctrines
Type
Research Article
Information
International Theory , Volume 15 , Issue 1 , March 2023 , pp. 1 - 23
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abou El Fadl, Khaled. 2003. “The Human Rights Commitment in Modern Islam.” In Human Rights and Responsibilities in the World Religions, edited by Runzo, Joseph, Sharma, Arvind, and Martin, Nancy M., 301–64. Oxford, UK: Oneworld.Google Scholar
Abou El Fadl, Khaled. 2007. The Great Theft: Wrestling Islam from the Extremists. New York, NY: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Achen, Christopher, and Bartels, Larry. 2017. Democracy for Realists. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ahmed, Leila. 2011. A Quiet Revolution. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
An-Na‛īm, Abdullahi Aḥmed. 1996. Toward an Islamic Reformation. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
An-Na‛īm, Abdullahi Aḥmed. 2011. “Islam and Human Rights.” In Religion and Human Rights, edited by Witte, John and Green, M. Christian, 56–68. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asad, Talal. 2008. “Reflections on Blasphemy and Secular Criticism.” In Religion: Beyond a Concept, edited by Hent de Vries, 580–609. New York, NY: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
Barkow, Jerome, Cosmides, Leda, and Tooby, John. 1992. The Adapted Mind. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, USA.Google Scholar
Beitz, Charles. 2000. “Rawls's Law of Peoples.” Ethics 110: 669–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beitz, Charles. 2001. “Human Rights as a Common Concern.” American Political Science Review 95: 269–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beitz, Charles. 2009. The Idea of Human Rights. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brock, Gillian. 2014. “Human Rights.” In A Companion to Rawls, edited by Mandle, Jon and Reidy, David A., 346–60. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, Allen. 2004. Justice, Legitimacy, and Self-Determination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Caney, Simon. 2002. “Cosmopolitanism and the Law of Peoples.” Journal of Political Philosophy 10 (1): 95–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chan, Joseph. 1999. “A Confucian Perspective on Human Rights for Contemporary China.” In The East Asian Challenge for Human Rights, edited by Bauer, J. and Bell, D., 212–40. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, Joshua. 2004. “Minimalism about Human Rights.” Journal of Political Philosophy 12 (2): 190–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawes, Robyn, Van de Kragt, Alphons, and Orbell, John. 1990. “Cooperation for the Benefit of Us – Not Me, or My Conscience.” In Beyond Self-Interest, edited by Mansbridge, Jane, 97–110. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
De Waal, Frans, Macedo, Stephen, and Ober, Josiah. 2006. Primates and Philosophers: How Morality Evolved. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diamond, Jared. 2013. The World Until Yesterday. New York, NY: Penguin.Google Scholar
Ellemers, Naomi, Spears, Russell, and Doosje, Bertjan. 2002. “Self and Social Identity.” Annual Review of Psychology 53 (1): 161–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Freeman, Samuel. 2002. The Cambridge Companion to Rawls. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, Samuel. 2006. “The Law of Peoples, Social Cooperation, Human Rights, and Distributive Justice.” Social Philosophy and Policy 23 (1): 29–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, Joshua. 2013. Moral Tribes. New York, NY: Penguin.Google Scholar
Hafez, Sherine. 2011. An Islam of Her Own. New York, NY: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Haidt, Jonathan. 2012. The Righteous Mind. New York, NY: Vintage.Google Scholar
Haidt, Jonathan, and Joseph, Craig. 2008. “The Moral Mind.” In The Innate Mind 3, edited by Carruthers, Peter, Laurence, Stephen, and Stich, Stephen, 367–92. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hauser, Marc. 2006. Moral Minds. New York, NY: Ecco/HarperCollins Publishers.Google Scholar
Heath, Joseph. 2005. “Rawls on Global Distributive Justice: A Defence.” Canadian journal of philosophy Supplementary Volume 31: 193–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henrich, Joseph, Heine, Steven, and Norenzayan, Ara. 2010. “The Weirdest People in the World?.” Behavioral and brain sciences 33 (2–3): 61–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Herr, Ranjoo Seodu. 2018. “Islamist Women's Agency and Relational Autonomy.” Hypatia 33 (2): 195–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herr, Ranjoo Seodu. 2019. “Women's Rights as Human Rights and Cultural Imperialism.” Feminist Formations 31 (3): 118–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, Scott, and Benford, Robert. 2010. “Collective Identity, Solidarity, and Commitment.” In The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements, edited by Soule, Sarah A., Snow, David, and Kriesi, Hanspeter, 433–57. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ibrahimhakkioglu, Fulden. 2012. “Embodied Affective Experience in Saba Mahmood's Politics of Piety.” APA Newsletter on Feminism and Philosophy 12 (1): 4–19.Google Scholar
Jones, Peter. 2001. “Human Rights and Diverse Cultures: Continuity or Discontinuity?.” In Human Rights and Global Diversity, edited by Caney, Peter and Jones, Simon, 27–50. Portland, OR: Frank Cass.Google Scholar
Kohlberg, Lawrence. 1986. The Philosophy of Moral Development. New York, NY: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Macleod, Alistair. 2006. “Rawls's Narrow Doctrine of Human Rights.” In Rawls's Law of Peoples, edited by Martin, Rex and Reidy, David A., 134–49. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahmood, Saba. 2005/2012. Politics of Piety: The Islamic Revival and the Feminist Subject. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Mandle, Jon. 2020. “Tolerating Decent Societies.” In John Rawls: Debating the Major Questions, edited by Mandle, Jon and Roberts-Cady, Sarah, 371–81. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
March, Andrew. 2019. The Caliphate of Man. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
McAdams, Dan, and Pals, Jennifer. 2006. “A New Big Five: Fundamental Principles for an Integrative Science of Personality.” American Psychologist 61 (3): 204–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mendes, Natacha, Steinbeis, Nikolaus, Bueno-Guerra, Nereida, Call, Josep, and Singer, Tania. 2018. “Preschool Children and Chimpanzees Incur Costs to Watch Punishment of Antisocial Others.” Nature Human Behaviour 2 (1): 45–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, David. 2000. “The Good, the Poor and the Ugly: John Rawls and How Liberals Should Treat Non-Liberal Regimes.” Times Literary Supplement 24.Google Scholar
Miller, David. 2007. National Responsibility and Global Justice. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moellendorf, Darrel. 1996. “Constructing the Law of Peoples.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 77 (2): 132–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nickel, James. 2007. Making Sense of Human Rights. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha. 2000. Women and Human Development. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Okin, Susan. 1994. “Gender Inequality and Cultural Differences.” Political Theory 22 (1): 5–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oshana, Marina. 2006. Personal Autonomy in Society. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing.Google Scholar
Pogge, Thomas. 2003. “The Incoherence between Rawls's Theories of Justice.” Fordham Law Review 72: 1739–59.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1993. Political Liberalism (LP). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1999a. The Law of Peoples (LoP). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1999b. A Theory of Justice (TJ), rev. ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, John. 1999c. “The Idea of Public Reason Revisited.” In LoP.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 2001. Justice as Fairness: A Restatement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reidy, David. 2006. “Political Authority and Human Rights.” In Rawls's Law of Peoples, edited by Martin, Rex and Reidy, David A., 169–87. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reidy, David. 2017. “Moral Psychology, Stability and the Law of Peoples.” Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence 30 (2): 363–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rostami-Povey, Elaheh. 2007. Afghan Women: Identity and Invasion. London: Zed Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sachedina, Abdulaziz. 2009. Islam and the Challenge of Human Rights. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salime, Zakia. 2011. Between Feminism and Islam. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shweder, Richard, Mahapatra, Manamohan, and Miller, Joan. 1987. “Culture and Moral Development.” In The Emergence of Morality in Young Children, edited by Kagan, J. and Lamb, S., 1–90. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Christian. 2003. Moral, Believing Animals. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sperber, Dan. 2005. “Modularity and Relevance.” The Innate Mind, edited by Carruthers, Peter, Laurence, Stephen, and Stich, Stephen, 53–68. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Superson, Anita. 2005. “Deformed Desires and Informed Desire Tests.” Hypatia 20 (4) 109–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tajfel, Henri. 1981. Human Groups and Social Categories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tan, Kok-Chor. 2006. “The Problem of Decent Peoples.” In Rawls's Law of Peoples, edited by Martin, Rex and Reidy, David A., 76–94. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tancredi, Laurence. 2005. Hardwired Behavior. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tasioulas, John. 2002. “From Utopia to Kazanistan.” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 22 (2).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Charles. 1999. “Conditions of an Unforced Consensus on Human Rights.” In The East Asian Challenge for Human Rights, edited by Bauer, Joanne R. and Bell, Daniel A., 124–45. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Teson, Fernando. 1995. “The Rawlsian Theory of International Law.” Ethics & International Affairs 9: 79–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, John. 2010/1985. “Social Categorization and the Self-Concept.” In Key Readings in Social Psychology: Rediscovering Social Identity, edited by Postmes, T. & Branscombe, N. R., 243–72. New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Wellman, Christopher Heath. 2012. “Reinterpreting Rawls's the Law of Peoples.” Social Philosophy and Policy 29 (1): 213–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wenar, Leif. 2006. “Why Rawls is Not a Cosmopolitan Egalitarian.” In Rawls's Law of Peoples, edited by Martin, Rex and Reidy, David A., 95–113. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westlund, Andrea. 2009. Rethinking Relational Autonomy. Hypatia 24: 26–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, David Sloan. 2002. Darwin's Cathedral. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar