Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T09:23:32.949Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

From meditation to action – a research agenda for studying informal global rule-making: remarks on ‘Cosmopolitanism, publicity, and the emergence of a “global administrative law”’

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 December 2020

Oliver Westerwinter Open the ORCID record for Oliver Westerwinter [Opens in a new window]
Oliver Westerwinter*
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, University of St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland and Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies, European University Institute, Fiesole FI, Italy
*
Corresponding author. E-mail: oliver.westerwinter@unisg.ch
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Friedrich Kratochwil engages critically with the emergence of a global administrative law and its consequences for the democratic legitimacy of global governance. While he makes important contributions to our understanding of global governance, he does not sufficiently discuss the differences in the institutional design of new forms of global law-making and their consequences for the effectiveness and legitimacy of global governance. I elaborate on these limitations and outline a comparative research agenda on the emergence, design, and effectiveness of the diverse arrangements that constitute the complex institutional architecture of contemporary global governance.

Keywords

Effectivenessglobal administrative lawinformal governanceinstitutional designlegitimacytransnational public–private governance
Type
Symposium: In the Midst of Theory and Practice: Edited by Hannes Peltonen and Knut Traisbach
Information
International Theory , Volume 13 , Issue 3 , November 2021 , pp. 560 - 566
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Avant, Deborah. 2016. “Pragmatic Networks and Transnational Governance of Private Military and Security Services.” International Studies Quarterly 60 (2): 330–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avant, Deborah, and Westerwinter, Oliver. 2016. “Introduction. Networks and Transnational Security Governance.” In The New Power Politics. Networks and Transnational Security Governance, edited by Avant, Deborah and Westerwinter, Oliver, 1–18. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cutler, A. Claire, Haufler, Virginia, and Porter, Tony, eds. 1999. Private Authority and International Affairs. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Dingwerth, Klaus. 2007. The New Transnationalism. Transnational Governance and Democratic Legitimacy. Houndmills: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Eilstrup-Sangiovanni, Mette. 2009. “Varieties of Cooperation. Government Networks in International Security.” In Networked Politics. Agency, Power, and Governance, edited by Kahler, Miles, 194–227. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Esty, Daniel C. 2006. “Good Governance at the Supranational Scale: Globalizing Administrative Law.” Yale Law Journal 115 (7): 1490–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, Ruth W., and Keohane, Robert O.. 2005. “Accountability and Abuses of Power in World Politics.” American Political Science Review 99 (1): 29–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gstöhl, Sieglinde. 2007. “Governance through Government Networks: The G8 and International Organizations.” The Review of International Organizations 2 (1): 1–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahler, Miles. 2018. “From Complex Interdependence to Complex Governance.” Manuscript: American University.Google Scholar
Kingsbury, Benedict, Krisch, Nico, and Stewart, Richard B.. 2005. “The Emergence of Global Administrative Law.” Law and Contemporary Problems 68 (3): 15–61.Google Scholar
Kratochwil, Friedrich. 2014. The Status of Law in World Society: Meditations on the Role and Rule of Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lake, David A. 2010. “Rightful Rules: Authority, Order, and the Foundations of Global Governance.” International Studies Quarterly 54 (3): 587–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansfield, Edward D., and Milner, Helen V.. 2012. Votes, Vetoes, and the Political Economy of International Trade Regime. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Slaughter, Anne-Marie. 2004. A New World Order? Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Stone, Randall W. 2011. Controlling Institutions. International Organizations and the Global Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vabulas, Felicity, and Snidal, Duncan. 2013. “Organization without Delegation: Informal Intergovernmental Organizations (IIGOs) and the Spectrum of Intergovernmental Arrangements.” The Review of International Organizations 8 (2): 193–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westerwinter, Oliver. 2014. “The Politics of Transnational Institutions: Power, Bargaining and Institutional Choice.” Unpublished dissertation manuscript, European University Institute.Google Scholar
Westerwinter, Oliver. 2020. “Transnational Public–Private Governance Initiatives in World Politics: Introducing a New Dataset.” The Review of International Organizations. Available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-019-09366-w. Accessed 1 July 2020.Google Scholar
Westerwinter, Oliver, Abbott, Kenneth W., and Biersteker, Thomas. 2020. “Informal Governance in World Politics.” The Review of International Organizations. Available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-020-09382-1. Accessed 1 July 2020.Google Scholar
Zaring, David. 1998. “International Law by Other Means: The Twilight Existence of International Financial Regulatory Organizations.” Texas International Law Journal 33 (2): 281–330.Google Scholar