Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-888d5979f-lv79x Total loading time: 0.272 Render date: 2021-10-25T12:00:11.651Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

How uncertainty about outside options impedes international cooperation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 March 2012

Johannes Urpelainen*
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA

Abstract

International cooperation often requires costly policy adjustments. States may worry, however, that such adjustments weaken their outside options, and thus reduce their bargaining power. How does uncertainty about the effects of policy adjustments on outside options influence the depth of cooperation that states can achieve? My game-theoretic analysis shows that uncertainty about outside options is an obstacle to deep cooperation. If states agree on deep cooperation, they have to compensate vulnerable states with weak outside options for their losses. Under uncertainty, states that are not vulnerable have an incentive to falsely claim that they are vulnerable (i) to avoid a side payment or (ii) to obtain compensation for being vulnerable. The result holds even if the added value of deep cooperation would be large enough to fully compensate the losers. In equilibrium, the more vulnerable state sometimes offers a side payment to the less vulnerable one. More broadly, the analysis reveals a new international cooperation problem and provides a new rationale for costly signaling mechanisms and delegation to international organizations.

Type
Original Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, Kenneth W.Snidal, Duncan. 1998. “Why States Act through Formal International Organizations.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 42(1):332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alesina, Alberto, Angeloni, Ignazio, Etro, Federico. 2005. “International Unions.” American Economic Review 95(3):602615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Axelrod, RobertKeohane, Robert O.. 1985. “Achieving Cooperation under Anarchy: Strategies and Institutions.” World Politics 38(1):226254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagwell, KyleStaiger, Robert W.. 1999. “An Economic Theory of GATT.” American Economic Review 89(1):215248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagwell, KyleStaiger, Robert W. 2005. “Enforcement, Private Political Pressure, and the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade/World Trade Organization Escape Clause.” Journal of Legal Studies 34(3):471513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banks, Jeffrey S. 1990. “Equilibrium Behavior in Crisis Bargaining Games.” American Journal of Political Science 34(3):599614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barberà, SalvadorJackson, Matthew O.. 2006. “On the Weights of Nations: Assigning Voting Weights in a Heterogeneous Union.” Journal of Political Economy 114(2):317339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrett, Scott. 2001. “International Cooperation for Sale.” European Economic Review 45(10):18351850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binmore, Ken, Rubinstein, ArielWolinsky, Asher. 1986. “The Nash Bargaining Solution in Economic Modelling.” Rand Journal of Economics 17(2):176188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, Curtis A.Kelley, Judith G.. 2008. “The Concept of International Delegation.” Law and Contemporary Problems 71(1):136.Google Scholar
Carrubba, Clifford J. 1997. “Net Financial Transfers in the European Union: Who Gets What and Why?Journal of Politics 59(2):469496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, Terrence L. 2007. “International Security Institutions, Domestic Politics, and Institutional Legitimacy.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 51(1):134166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooley, AlexanderSpruyt, Hendrik. 2009. Contracting States: Sovereign Transfers in International Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, Vincent P.Sobel., Joel 1982. “Strategic Information Transmission.” Econometrica 50(6):14311451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dai, Xinyuan. 2005. “Why Comply? The Domestic Constituency Mechanism.” International Organization 59(2):363398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downs, George W.Rocke, David M.. 1995. Optimal Imperfection? Domestic Uncertainty and Institutions in International Relations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Downs, George W., Rocke, David M.Barsoom, Peter N.. 1996. “Is the Good News about Compliance Good News about Cooperation?International Organization 50(3):379406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fearon, James D. 1995. “Rationalist Explanations of War.” International Organization 49(3):379414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fearon, James D. 1997. “Signaling Foreign Policy Interests: Tying Hands versus Sinking Costs.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 41(1):6890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fearon, James D. 1998. “Bargaining, Enforcement, and International Cooperation.” International Organization 52(2):269305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleck, Robert K.Kilby., Christopher 2006. “World Bank Independence: A Model and Statistical Analysis of US Influence.” Review of Development Economics 10(2):224240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilligan, Michael J., Johns, LeslieRosendorff, Peter B.. 2010. “Strengthening International Courts and the Early Settlement of Disputes.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 54(1):538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, Judith, Kahler, Miles, Keohane, Robert O.Slaughter., Anne-Marie 2000. “Introduction: Legalization and World Politics.” International Organization 54(3):385399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grieco, Joseph M. 1982. “Between Dependency and Autonomy: India's Experience with the International Computer Industry.” International Organization 36(3):609632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grossman, Sanford J.Hart, Oliver D.. 1986. “The Costs and Benefits of Ownership: A Theory of Vertical and Lateral Integration.” Journal of Political Economy 94(4):691719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haftel, Yoram Z.Thompson, Alexander. 2006. “The Independence of International Organizations: Concept and Applications.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 50(2):253275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hathaway, Oona A. 2008. “International Delegation and State Sovereignty.” Law and Contemporary Problems 71(1):136.Google Scholar
Ikenberry, G. John. 1998. “Constitutional Politics in International Relations.” European Journal of International Relations 4(2):147177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ikenberry, G. John 2000. After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order after Major Wars. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. 1984. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. 1986. “Reciprocity in International Relations.” International Organization 40(1):127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keohane, Robert O.Nye, Joseph S.. 1977. Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Konstantinidis, Nikitas. 2008. “Gradualism and Uncertainty in International Union Formation: The European Community's First Enlargement.” Review of International Organizations 3(4):399433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koremenos, Barbara. 2001. “Loosening the Ties that Bind: A Learning Model of Agreement Flexibility.” International Organization 55(2):289325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koremenos, Barbara, Lipson, CharlesSnidal, Duncan. 2001. “The Rational Design of International Institutions.” International Organization 55(4):761799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krasner, Stephen D. 1991. “Global Communications and National Power: Life on the Pareto Frontier.” World Politics 43(3):336366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kydd, Andrew H. 2000. “Trust, Reassurance, and Cooperation.” International Organization 54(2):325357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lake, David A. 1996. “Anarchy, Hierarchy, and the Variety of International Relations.” International Organization 50(1):134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lake, David A. 2009a. Hierarchy in International Relations. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Lake, David A. 2009b. “Open Economy Politics: A Critical Review.” Review of International Organizations 4(3):219244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maggi, GiovanniMorelli, Massimo. 2006. “Self-Enforcing Voting in International Organizations.” American Economic Review 96(4):11371158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Lisa L. 2000. Democratic Commitments: Legislatures and International Commitments. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCall Smith, James. 2000. “The Politics of Dispute Settlement Design: Explaining Legalism in Regional Trade Pacts.” International Organization 54(1):137180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLaren, John. 1997. “Size, Sunk Costs, and Judge Bowker's Objection to Free Trade.” American Economic Review 87(3):400420.Google Scholar
Morrow, James D. 1994. “Modeling the Forms of International Cooperation: Distribution Versus Information.” International Organization 48(3):387423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myerson, Roger B. 1979. “Incentive Compatibility and the Bargaining Problem.” Econometrica 47:6174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nash, John F. 1950. “The Bargaining Problem.” Econometrica 18(2):155162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rector, Chad. 2009. Federations: The Political Dynamics of Cooperation. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Rosendorff, B. Peter. 2005. “Stability and Rigidity: Politics and Design of the WTO's Dispute Settlement Procedure.” American Political Science Review 99(3):389400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scobell, Andew. 2004. China and North Korea: From Comrades-in-Arms to Allies at Arm's Length. Strategic Studies Institute.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sebenius, James K. 1983. “Negotiation Arithmetic: Adding and Subtracting Issues and Parties.” International Organization 37(2):281316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slapin, Jonathan B. 2009. “Exit, Voice, and Cooperation: Bargaining Power in International Organizations and Federal Systems.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 21(2):187211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinberg, Richard H. 2002. “In the Shadow of Law or Power? Consensus-Based Bargaining and Outcomes in the GATT/WTO.” International Organization 56(2):339374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, Randall W. 2008. “The Scope of IMF Conditionality.” International Organization 62(4):589620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tallberg, Jonas. 2002. “Paths to Compliance: Enforcement, Management, and the European Union.” International Organization 56(3):609643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Alexander. 2006. “Coercion Through IOs: The Security Council and the Logic of Information Transmission.” International Organization 60(1):134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tollison, Robert D.Willett., Thomas D. 1979. “An Economic Theory of Mutually Advantageous Issue Linkages in International Negotiations.” International Organization 33(4):425449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tucker, Jonathan B. 1991. “Partners and Rivals: A Model of International Collaboration in Advanced Technology.” International Organization 45(1):83120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Urpelainen, Johannes. 2010. “Enforcing International Environmental Cooperation: Technological Standards Can Help.” Review of International Organizations 5(4):475496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Urpelainen, Johannes 2011. “Domestic Reform as a Rationale for Gradualism in International Cooperation.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 23(3):400427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voeten, Erik. 2008. “The Impartiality of International Judges: Evidence from the European Court of Human Rights.” American Political Science Review 102(4):417433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, R. Harrison. 2000. “Bargaining and War.” American Journal of Political Science 44(3):469484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, Katja. 2002. “Hierarchy Amidst Anarchy: A Transaction Costs Approach to International Security Cooperation.” International Studies Quarterly 41(2):321340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yarbrough, Beth V.Yarbrough, Robert M.. 1992. Cooperation and Governance in International Trade: The Strategic Organizational Approach. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zamora, Stephen. 1980. “Voting in International Economic Organizations.” American Journal of International Law 74(3):566608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

How uncertainty about outside options impedes international cooperation
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

How uncertainty about outside options impedes international cooperation
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

How uncertainty about outside options impedes international cooperation
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *