In January 1918, the socialist Reds in Finland resorted to force in their struggle for a social revolution, whereas the conservative Whites supported the government and wanted to expel the Russian troops still in the country. This chaotic situation became a civil war.Footnote 1 Revolutionary ideas inspired thousands of women to support the Red Guard. These “Red women” worked both for the troops and as armed troops themselves.Footnote 2 With the war ending in a victory for the Whites, the rebels (women as well as men) were tried for treason.
During the hearings, each defendant had to state why she had joined the Red Guard or otherwise supported the cause. The most common justifications given in their testimonies were economic – the good salary the Red Guard paid. Many also justified joining the Guard by saying, “Because others joined too”, or “I was told to”.Footnote 3 Who were these “others”, who had such an influence on these women? What were the overarching factors that brought these women together, and how were these women acquainted with each other?
The reasons the women gave were probably not always the real reasons: most women tried to minimize their sentences by understating their commitment and importance. It was rare for a woman to admit she had joined for political reasons. Surely, there were more women who shared these political views, since the majority of them were also members of the labour movement.Footnote 4 The influence of others was also real. In previous studies, the example of family and co-workers proved to be an important factor in encouraging others to join the revolution.Footnote 5 The situation was undoubtedly complex and the reasons why women joined the Guard were manifold. Ideology, money, and comrades were all contributory factors and will have differed from one individual to another.Footnote 6
Our source material consists chiefly of documents produced by the authorities. Unfortunately this also means that the primary material available for this study included only fragmented and rare data on the social connections of these women. We reconstructed the prevailing social networks by treating the factors referred to above as social channels important for social interaction. Further, we assumed that geographical closeness (as implied by the same place of residence) strengthened social cohesion between women living in the same region. In order to model and analyse this complex set of relations, we decided to apply historical network analysis (HNA), a formal method developed to analyse and graphically present complex relationships.
Our hypothesis is that Red activity was based on organizations and everyday solidarity. The purpose of our article is therefore to analyse the networks of these Red women. What kind of connections were there? By exploring the networks, we are able to discover how revolutionary ideas were able to spread among workers. These networks were crucial not just before but also after the war, when the convicted women tried to survive in a society ruled by the Whites. The Reds were stigmatized as unfit citizens; support from other Reds was therefore of the utmost importance.
The Civil War is one of the most studied themes in Finnish history. It was also highly controversial – the terror during the conflict has aroused conflicting passions among researchers, and a great deal of controversy. Research into the collective memories of the period has also triggered heated debates. It has taken nearly a century to reach some sort of consensus that there is no one monolithic truth about the war, but that several parallel interpretations are equally valid.Footnote 7
The historiography of the research into the Finnish Civil War has gone through four waves. After the war, the official history was written by the victors. During this first wave, the war was described from the perspective of the Whites; the Reds were presented as the sole malefactors. Researchers referred to the war as a War of Liberation, Revolution, or Rebellion. In the 1960s, the situation changed when greater consideration was given to the Red view. The most important studies of this second wave were by Jaakko Paavolainen on the Red and White terror and by Viljo Rasila on the social background of the war and its adversaries. For the first time, the actions of the Whites were analysed critically.Footnote 8 One of the most important pioneers was Anthony F. Upton, who in 1980 wrote a comprehensive study of the Finnish revolution and Civil War.Footnote 9 It was a sort of prologue to the third wave, which began in the 1990s. This period was more neutral, and the term “civil war” gained ground among researchers. Also, a microhistorical approach emerged, with Risto Alapuro's and Heikki Ylikangas's path-breaking studies.Footnote 10 Both of these turns – the focus on the Red point of view and their social background, and later the microhistorical approach – have been significant to our study.
During the present century, the historiographical emphasis has shifted towards new military history – the fourth wave, with research focusing on such phenomena as myths, emotions, violence, and everyday life. It was not until this phase that ordinary women and children and their experiences were included.Footnote 11 Our study is interlinked with this field. By analysing women's networks, we are able to piece together at least some of their interactions and sphere of activity. As far as we know, ours is the first study of revolutionary women's networks in Finland, or indeed in any European country. Our approach is microhistorical. We focus on a local community and its social layers in a political system in transition. We are interested in the common people and their lives.
This article contributes, too, to the field of the digital humanitiesFootnote 12 and seeks to exemplify how quantified historical sources can be explored using digital methods and tools. We apply historical network analysis to analyse the significance and impact of regional, social networks and to improve our understanding of the structural factors affecting intra-group dynamics among the Red women who participated in the Finnish Civil War in 1918. Viljo Rasila used factor analysis in 1968 in his statistical study of the structures of Finland's political divisions in 1918.Footnote 13 We want to bring this study to the next level by studying the networks and closeness of the Reds.
Historical network analysis allows us to study the functions of multiple social background variables – here, we consider place of residence, kinship, and associations – in a much fuller way, and thus offers a promising tool for examining past communities at an aggregate level:
With SNA [social network analysis], we are only interested in individuals as part of a much bigger whole. In fact, one advantage to the technique is that SNA helps us view an entire community and figure out which individuals we should be truly interested in and which ones were perhaps less significant. When we study past relationships systematically as SNA allows, the method will prevent us from misunderstanding the function of an individual's relationships or exaggerating the distinctiveness of those relations.Footnote 14
We chose these three variables because our hypothesis is that the connection of these women to the labour movement would be significant. According to previous studies, the political power of the working class was based on getting organized. So, the first choice was obvious. Place of residence was also promising, since we knew that men's ties had been local. We wanted to see if this held true for women. Finally, kinship was chosen since we knew, after preliminary examination of the data, that there would be relatives, and previous research has shown the influence of family members to have been important.Footnote 15
We are convinced that the power of digital methods such as historical network analysis lies in their ability to allow a distant reading of large material corpora. For example, social interaction patterns can be rather complex and hard to perceive without proper visualization. This is exactly what HNA is designed for: to model and visualize complex relationships in an attractive visual form. At the same time, however, we are fully aware that all network visualizations require a proper context-aware interpretation and that qualitative research is also needed. Further, the network data can be derived from documents containing only historical facts. A well-known problem is the static nature of graphical visualizations, often criticized for “freezing” the course of history. An often-used workaround is to “chunk” the network in temporal snapshots. For this article, we are interested in one point in time only – the beginning of the Finnish Civil War. Hence the problem of dynamic networks is not highly relevant here.
The first section of this article describes the historical context by briefly presenting the main developments in Finland in 1917 and the first few months of 1918, which resulted in the outbreak of the Finnish Civil War. In the second, we present our primary material and discuss our method: historical network analysis. The third section presents the main analysis and revolves around network visualizations. We conclude by summing up the most important results and their implications.
The Civil War between the rebellious Reds and the conservative Whites broke out in January 1918. Its causes were multifarious and stemmed from both domestic and world politics. At the international level, the most important elements were, naturally, World War I and the collapse of the Russian Empire, the mother country of the Grand Duchy of Finland. After the downfall of the empire and the Bolshevik Revolution, Finland gained independence but was in such turmoil that it found itself embroiled in an agonizing and destructive civil war after only a few weeks of freedom.Footnote 16
World War I had shaken the foundations of the society in Russia to which Finland belonged as an autonomous district. The two revolutions in 1917 also affected the western territories of the empire. With regard to the Finnish region, state power had already slipped out of Russian hands after the March Revolution. However, the political atmosphere was tense. The Russian provisional government was aware of Finnish separatist ideas and was keen to repress attempts to secure full sovereignty. Finns tried to achieve this sovereignty by making the Finnish Parliament the highest legislative body. The provisional government refused to accept this and dissolved parliament and ordered new elections. The Bolsheviks, on the other hand, supported Finnish separatist aspirations. They hoped that their revolutionary ideas would spread to Finland and thus further Bolshevik aims.Footnote 17
During 1917, the domestic situation in Finland slowly evolved from minor disputes into ever-increasing violent conflicts. What circumstances led to this chaos? First, there was a serious shortage of food and work. Due to the chaos in Russia, Finland's trade to the east fell sharply and unemployment increased dramatically. There was also a severe lack of food because Finland was not self-sufficient and World War I interrupted grain imports from Russia, while in Finland itself the harvest was less abundant than usual. Price controls failed and the black market flourished. Workers were hungry and disappointed with the government and with producers. Riots and disorder became a part of everyday life.Footnote 18
Second, politics failed. Socialists and bourgeoisie were unwilling to compromise amid the resurfacing of old, ideological, class-based conflicts. Universal suffrage in 1906 had not mended the deep class divisions and socialists and bourgeoisie were reluctant to share power, accusing each other of attempting a coup d’état. The socialists became frustrated when parliament was dissolved by the Russian provisional government in the summer of 1917 and they lost their majority after new elections in October 1918. If the political decision-making processes had worked, the difficult economic situation might have been ameliorated. Things went from bad to worse, however, since political problems aggravated everyday concerns.Footnote 19
Third, after the first Russian Revolution in March, there was no police force in Finland. Nor did it have an army of its own. There was no official paramilitary force to control restless crowds. In the summer and autumn of 1917, during the worker strikes and political unrest, local militia were founded in order to protect the political rights of strikers and also the rights and political agenda of the landed estate owners. These early militia were clearly class-based, especially in the countryside, but later their composition became more complex.Footnote 20 Originally, the militia were regional and lacked general rules and cohesion. However, these coalitions were preliminary phases for the subsequent formation of the national Red and White guards, which both had c.100,000 soldiers. The Reds had 2,600 female soldiers, with a further 10,000 women as service troops. All of them were located in southern Finland.Footnote 21
Finland gained its long-hoped-for independence in December 1917. It was not a time for celebration. Disagreements between socialists and non-socialists became more intense. Finally, despite efforts by more moderate party members, the radical socialists launched a revolution in January 1918. Inspired by the Russian Revolution, they were ready to seize the opportunity and carry out a coup d’état. However, they did not adopt the Bolshevik model. They believed in armed, but peaceful revolution. The Reds did not plan to make Finland a constituent part of Lenin's Russia but to create an independent state. This fundamental difference explains, at least partly, why people were so willing to join the revolution, which later became a civil war.Footnote 22
As Jorma Kalela has pointed out, the historical events that occurred in Finland in 1918 should not be seen in isolation but as part of the series of proletarian revolts that took place in Europe from 1917 to 1920. However, the Finnish case had three characteristics that marked it out from revolts elsewhere in Europe. First, in Finland the proletariat was united. They split into communists and social democrats only after the revolution had been suppressed. Second, the revolutionaries managed to hold on to power for nearly three months. Third, in Finland the revolt took place earlier than in Central Europe, where the uprisings occurred only after World War I.Footnote 23 The Finnish Civil War lasted for just over three months and ended in victory for the Whites. Though brief, the war was bloody and brutal. It left one per cent of Finland's population dead as a result of battles, terror, and famine in POW camps.Footnote 24
The Red revolution needed both soldiers and service workers. Women, too, were called up for duty. The Red administration was surprised that women were eager to take up arms. Approximately 2,600 armed themselves. They were generally unmarried and young – most of them were under the age of twenty-one. Only some of them took part in battle; the rest acted as sentries. They did, however, play an important role in propaganda. Red newspapers used the fact that women were willing to risk their lives to put pressure on Red men to join in combat too. The Whites were appalled by the thought of women taking up arms, arguing that it was contrary to the social system and inappropriate for a woman to fight.Footnote 25
For many years, the image of a Red woman has been dominated by those 2,600 armed females and the role they played in the history of the Finnish Civil War. In contrast, we know little about the unarmed Red women. There were approximately 10,000 women who undertook traditional duties, such as nursing and subsidiary tasks.Footnote 26 They were older than the female soldiers; many of them were married and had children. They were seduced into joining not just by ideological considerations; good wages also played a role. The Reds had occupied Helsinki in the first few days of the war and seized the Bank of Finland; this enabled them to offer generous salaries that doubled the incomes of recruits.
Most of these Red women were also members of the labour movement. Party members were consequently committed to the cause and wanted to help change the prevailing social system.Footnote 27 As Hoppu and Klemettilä have already noted, money was therefore not the only reason for joining the Guard.Footnote 28 Some of these women and girls undoubtedly did not understand the gravity of their actions in joining, nor were they aware of the serious consequences of this affiliation. For example, thirteen-year-old Karin Sandberg, who washed dishes in the Red Guard's canteen for two weeks, probably did not realise that this job would land her in court.Footnote 29
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Sources and data
To be able to examine the roots of an organization, we restrict our study to a particular region and community.Footnote 30 A restricted area is a prerequisite, especially for network analysis. The subjects of our analysis are the women from the district of Pori, in western Finland (Figure 1).Footnote 31 This region is a fertile research subject, since it was situated near the front line and occupied by the Reds, who needed a large army service corps. Women were consequently also needed. Moreover, the labour movement was strong in this region, and workers were well unionized. Hence, the political atmosphere favoured radical change. Consequently, the second largest regional group to face trial in the political crimes courts after the war comprised women from this province.
Our data comprise 267 women. We included all women from the district of Pori accused of Red activity. After the war, these Red women ended up in court on charges of committing treason or assisting in treasonous activity. They had either worked in support roles, been agitators, or were Red refugees. These women form a heterogeneous group. Their ages vary from thirteen to sixty-nine years, but most were in their twenties or thirties. Of the women, 53 per cent were unmarried, 37 per cent married, and 11 per cent were war widows. By profession, they were mainly factory workers, craftspeople, maids, or housewives; 69 per cent of them were members of the labour movement.Footnote 32 We examine the connections among all these women. In addition, to tackle the microhistorical dimension, we closely examine the women from the Aronen family, as representative of the larger group of Red women, which comprised around 5,500 people tried in court after the Civil War. We refer to our research subjects by their own names since more than a century has passed and we aim to do justice to them by understanding their activity in the context of their era.
Our materials consist of documents from various archival sources. The trial documents in the National Archive contain ten to twenty pages of information on each defendant, including interrogation notes in which we can read their own stories and where they explain what they had done, why, and where. The statements given in the interrogations are documented on official forms; descriptions are normally brief. It should be noted that these statements were made under extreme duress and so should be interpreted cautiously. For example, many of the women lied about their union membership. There are also letters of recommendation from relatives and influential individuals, as well as abusive letters from foes. The files also contain an official certificate, a two-page statement from the local White authorities, and the court verdict. We use them to identify the women who were prosecuted for treason and to get an overall picture of them and their backgrounds. These documents were produced by the authorities. We also have a few interviews recorded with these women in the 1960s. Unfortunately, there are no letters or diaries available and thus we have to content ourselves with this scarce material on the motives of these women.
The files of the local workers’ associations and trade union branches in the Labour Archives reveal the political participation of these women.Footnote 33 Furthermore, the local parish registers and municipal archives are used as a source of information about kinship and place of residence. Qualitative analysis does not help us identify the potential interrelationships between these women. We need network analysis to help us see the nexus of the social relationships and to identify the key women in the network.
ON HISTORICAL NETWORK ANALYSIS
The structure and dynamics of relationships between the issues, events, and people underlying historical phenomena are of key interest in historical research. In recent years, many historians have shown a growing interest in applying digital or other formal methods to their empirical material in order to model and analyse patterns of social interaction underlying certain phenomena. One approach enjoying slowly growing popularity among historians is historical network research (HNR), a research paradigm stressing the importance of relationships among units (people, organizations, concepts, etc.) to explain historical phenomena.Footnote 34
Network research itself dates back to the late nineteenth century, but it was the development of powerful personal computers and easy-to-use software allowing graphical presentations, i.e. visualizations of networks, that increased interest in network research among historians. Another important pioneering role was played by those digital or computational historians at the crossroads of computational science and historical research who showed how social network analysis can be exploited to address research questions relevant for historical research.
The main focus of HNR lies in analysing relational patterns such as social or institutional relations or interactions in a historical context.Footnote 35 It has been applied to map, measure, model, and visualize relationships between different units in a network. In recent years, network visualizations have gained a central position in network research, for two reasons in particular. First, new, easy-to-use visualization software is available, making data visualization much easier. And second, network visualizations are an effective form of presenting complex relationships in an intuitive and quite easy-to-understand form. Additionally, different visualization layouts offer new possibilities for highlighting network-related attributes or visualizing a node's relevance in regard to its close neighbourhood or the complete network.Footnote 36
Historical network analysis as a spin-off of social network analysis is part of the Anglo-Saxon, quantitatively oriented development line of network research. Accordingly, HNR has its theoretical foundations in graph theory in mathematics, where a network is defined as a set of dots (nodes, vertices) and connecting lines (edges) between nodes.Footnote 37 Both nodes and edges can be enriched by attaching both quantitative and qualitative attributes to them, and these attributes can be used in the analysis. The main purpose of using attributes, however, is to ensure that the formal network model, the network topology, provides valid, reliable, and appropriate information to answer the research question.
The analytical focus of network analysis lies in the network structure, consisting of nodes and edges, and is based on the assumption that both the units (nodes) selected for the analysis and the connections (edges) between these are significant when it comes to understanding and explaining the larger phenomenon the network is connected to. Consequently, the main purpose of using network analysis and visualization tools is to elucidate structural aspects from the research object neglected or left unidentified by other research methods or tools. Although the analogy is not perfect, strong similarities exist between network analysis and statistical analysis, especially at the level of the research process. The network metrics used to describe the central characteristics of a network's structure can be compared to coefficients produced by fitting a statistical model. From this perspective, both provide quantitative information about dependencies between variables in the data, thus improving our understanding of the phenomenon subject to analysis.Footnote 38
The primary material used in this article was processed into quantified network data in three steps. First, we extracted all socially relevant information from the original historical documents. In addition to name and place of residence, we extracted information about membership of trade union branches and workers’ associations, as well as about kinships. We justify this selection by the fact that societies and associations are among the most central forms of organizations with regard to collective action.Footnote 39 This information was stored in an affiliation matrix, with each row representing one “Red woman” and each column representing a single variable. This table was imported to R, a statistical package,Footnote 40 for advanced analysis.
Second, we created the actual network data by connecting women who had been members of the same workers’ association or the same trade union branch, and who had lived in the same residence. We also added connections based on kinship. In the third step, we imported the network data to Visone, an open-source software program for network analysis and visualizations. Visone offers an extensive set of analytical tools and innovative network visualization integrated into an intuitive, easy-to-use user interface.Footnote 41
SOCIAL NETWORKS OF THE “RED WOMEN”
We have split our analysis into three main parts, each analysing the same network data from a specific perspective. The methodological aim is to exemplify and evidence how historical social network analysis can be exploited to analyse the historical social reality reconstructed and represented through social networks. Each sub-analysis starts with a specific network visualization seeking to highlight analytically interesting and relevant aspects from the social networks of selected Red women residing permanently in the Pori region.
All networks visualized and analysed in this article are one-mode networks, where two women are connected if they are members of the same workers’ association, the same local trade union branch, or if they share the same place of residence. Since the network data is created by projecting a two-mode network – for instance, a person to trade union branch network – onto a one-mode social network – for instance, onto a person-to-person network where connections are based on shared trade union branch membership – all nodes sharing the same affiliation form a fully connected clique. Such a projection is also needed as we want to calculate some network measures and most of these are defined for one-mode networks only.Footnote 42 We are aware of the issues constraining the application of certain network measures to a projected one-mode networkFootnote 43 and systematically avoid using these. Further, as regards the overall objectives of this article, these technical and theoretical issues are less relevant and do not outweigh the benefits of using projected one-mode network data in order to explore social interaction patterns. Another advantage is that the reader can visually explore – by focusing on the link colours – what kind of connections exist between the women.
Figure 2 illustrates the geographical closeness of the city of Pori. As we can see, Pori's city centre was very compact and the distances between the city's sections very short. However, the Pori region was geographically rather large and included districts far from the centre. A good example is the district of Reposaari, an island located twenty-five kilometres northwest of the centre.Footnote 44 The labour movement was very active in Reposaari. Of the women we studied who came from there, eighty-two per cent were organized.Footnote 45 Our study also includes the rural communes in Pori and Ulvila, both located around the city of Pori. Those parishes were geographically fragmented and comprised several small villages across a quite large geographic area. At the beginning of the twentieth century, it was difficult for the poor to travel far – the chief means of transport was by foot. Thus, geographical mobility was low and communication over longer distances often depended on newspapers and visits from political activists.Footnote 46
We start our exploratory analysis with Figure 3, which presents the social network of the 267 women based on their membership of workers’ associations and trade union branches. Each node in the network represents one woman. The connections (links) visualized in green indicate that the two women were members of the same workers’ association; the connections visualized in red represent membership of the same trade union branch. Although all links of the same main type (workers’ association or labour union branch) are visualized in the same colour, heterogeneity within the same main type has been maintained. Hence, each individual workers’ association (green links) is visualized as its own sub-network and connects only those women who were members of this specific association.Footnote 47 The visualization is based on the “stress minimization” layout, a variant of force-directed layouts widely used in social network analysis. As the name suggests, the graph is treated as a spring system and the algorithm looks for a stable, “aesthetically pleasing” configuration displaying “as much symmetry as possible”.Footnote 48 The resulting graph is designed so that nodes having more mutual connections are visible as clusters/cliques.
Figure 3 evidences the important role of workers’ associations and trade union branches as the most remarkable factors that linked these women. In fact, sixty-nine per cent of them were members of the labour movement. Thus, the majority of these women were politically active and so would also have had political motives for supporting the revolution. It was quite natural for members of the Red Guard to also have been active members of the workers’ movement. In addition, at the beginning of the war, the Reds wanted to recruit women of a mature age, not young girls, to serve the forces. The women chosen had previously proved their loyalty to the cause, and the generous salary was seen as a kind of reward for their efforts on behalf of the labour movement. They also encouraged one another. For example, Helena Rosengrén told her interrogators that Amanda Nordling fetched her from home and asked her to work with her in the Red kitchen. Both were members of the same workers’ association.Footnote 49 Likewise, Hilda Tuominen said that her acquaintance Johanna Järvenpää had urged her to join the Red Cross of the Red Guard with her. They were both seamstresses and members of the workers’ association. The two of them were hired to sew bandages.Footnote 50
The social networks visualized in Figure 3 suggest the majority of these women were politically active, but there are a significant number of “isolates”, i.e. women who joined neither a trade union, nor a workers’ association. That a majority of them decided to join the Guard raises the question how these women acquired political information possibly relevant to that decision.
Since our primary sources are rather limited, even non-existent as regards daily interaction, for a plausible answer to this question we must rely on secondary sources, as well as on theoretical research on social proximity and closeness. Regarding the former, one should bear in mind that, apart from these active members of the labour movement, many others sympathized with the social democrats, read their newspapers, and participated in their gatherings in the People's Halls even though they did not pay the membership fee,Footnote 51 making them “unconnected isolates” in our visualization. According to the sociologist Risto Alapuro, these non-members belonged to the same social networks as the active members of the workers’ association, and the mutual meeting places of the networks were usually the local People's Halls.Footnote 52 Moreover, the historian Kari Teräs, who has studied the commitment of Finnish workers to trade unions, found that people on the inner and outer levels of the union organization were connected to each other in their everyday life and in various collective activities. Thus, the trade unions’ sphere of influence was much wider than their membership. Those who participated in the activities organized by the union often shared the same worldview and values of the actual members.Footnote 53 We can presume that these individuals on the fringes of the workers’ movement would be aware of any revolutionary plans. Many of them adopted these ideas and supported the Red Guard.
In several cases, membership of a local trade union branch shows that many of the women in this study worked in the same locations. For example, the members of the cotton mill workers union or Pihlava's sawmill union worked in the same premises and met each other daily.Footnote 54 Thus, they probably talked to one another about joining the Guard and encouraged each other to do so. For example, Fanni Sjöman claimed that Fanni Hockzell had persuaded her to join the Guard. They both worked in the cotton mill.Footnote 55 Previous research supports this notion: persuasion, pressure, and inspiration at the workplace were important factors when workers were considering whether to join the Guard. For example, sixty-three per cent of members of the armed female company in Valkeakoski worked at the same paper mill. In Hyvinkää, eighty per cent of those alleged to be Red women had worked together at the same woollen mill and most were union members. Men's union branches, for example carpenters and shoemakers in Helsinki, also formed their own companies. Usually, however, it was the workers’ associations that provided local troops.Footnote 56
All this points to the importance of place and geography. We should keep in mind that in the late 1910s, Finland was a pre-industrial, agricultural society and that most people lived and worked within a small geographical area. This also holds true for the Pori region. Further, several empirical studies have tackled the question of the impact of geography on social networks, resulting in a rather promising theoretical consideration of how geographical proximity supports social closeness and interactions.Footnote 57 For example, in his seminal study on kin and neighbours, Smith raises the role of residential propinquity by concluding that the “family systems may well have been ‘functionally extended’ both in horizontal and vertical directions”.Footnote 58 Smith continues – in accordance with our assumption that political ideas and information were disseminated among close neighbours – that neighbours “who in many cases were more important than kin, played a significant role through the giving of pledging support and aid in agricultural tasks”.Footnote 59
To test whether the idea of “functional extension” through neighbourliness is supported in our case, we enriched our network by adding geographically based connections – i.e. the place of residence information available in our data – to our initial network. We followed a simple procedure: if two women lived in the same location, a geographical connection was deemed to have existed between them.
The geographically extended social network of the Red women is visualized in Figure 4, where the geographical links are coloured blue (all other visual effects as in Figure 3). Due to the projected one-mode data, the places of residence determine the network representation (blue ties). Especially when Figure 4 is compared with Figure 3, this helps us to understand how the membership of different organizations actually connected different geographical locations. But also, how the geographical distance (Figure 2) disconnected certain actors from the core network revolving around the centre of Pori. What is evident is that the geographical neighbourliness explains approximately half of the connections between two distinct women. In other words, the social interaction structure established through shared memberships in a workers’ association or a trade union branch was functionally extended though neighbourliness. Theoretically – but based, too, on the empirical facts about the role of the local People's Halls and shared activities – all the women were able to join a workers’ association or a trade union branch. But they decided not to do so, making the organizational non-tie between women in the outer and inner layers just as important as a tie.Footnote 60
The geographically expanded social network comprises twenty-two components, or separate sub-networks, that have no shared connections with the other components. If the original network based on associational connections had 124 isolated women, the second network has only eleven non-connected nodes (women). These nodes consist of housewives, maids, or women who were independent craftswomen. A majority of these isolates resided rather far from the industrial centres in the countryside in rural communes or in smaller villages in the Ulvila region.Footnote 61 However, these women constitute only about four percent of our total sample, thus forming a tiny minority. The biggest sub-network – in network terminology, the giant component – can be easily identified in the topmost part of the graph. This giant component consists of 172 women (sixty-four per cent of all the women) and has about 2,500 edges. The dense area in the centre of the giant component connects women who lived in the IV, V, and Toejoki districts of the cities of Pori and Ulvila. These areas are marked in Figure 2. As Figure 2 shows, those districts were all within walking distance of one another.
The “functional extension” thesis referred to above seems to apply to our network as well, especially when we focus on the connections between those women who lived in different districts but were members of the same organizations. The workers’ association and trade union branch networks were rather small, but, as previous research has evidenced, smaller networks tend to produce a higher level of emotional closeness typical of families or/and kin relations.Footnote 62 In our case, the organizational connections among the geographical districts were fewer than those within the districts, resulting in what Ronald S. Burt defines as “a network of strongly interconnected elements […] in which people can broker connections between otherwise disconnected segments”,Footnote 63 thus creating competitive advantage with respect to information access for those women having organizational connections to women in other districts.Footnote 64 This is exactly what we observe when focusing on the role of membership of an organization: these women could transfer valuable information; they could also gatekeep it from one group to another. At the same time, however, they were dependent on their neighbours within their district, because their success in reaching non-members in a certain district depended heavily on the neighbourhood's ability to act as a “functional extension” for political communication. This also helps explain why not all women living in geographically close districts joined a workers’ association or trade union branch: in a situation where the neighbourhood truly acted as a functional extension for the organizations, there was no need to join an organization in order to maintain ideological closeness.Footnote 65
The following case illuminates our argument. During the Civil War, Aino Helin, an eighteen-year-old girl, was talking on the street with two of her friends from the same village when a man from the Guard struck up a conversation with them. He asked if they would be willing to join the Guard's First Aid. Aino was a member of a social democratic youth organization and immediately felt enthusiastic. The other girls wanted to follow as well. They hoped to join the Guard together and work together, as friends. It felt like an adventure and the three girls did not need to think long, Aino Helin later explained in an interview.Footnote 66
There is a special form of social connection relevant for our case as well: kinship. Although a vast majority of historical network studies deal with social relations among families, clans, or other forms of kin relations,Footnote 67 the kin itself has been studied as an end in itself: “Charting ‘who lived with whom’ became the answer to the question of how people related to each other in the past”, resulting in a rather scarce number of empirical studies on kinship and social relations.Footnote 68 Generally speaking, kinship relations enjoy a special status in social network analysis since they seem to be less prone to decay,Footnote 69 foster emotional closeness,Footnote 70 and are important for maintaining identity.Footnote 71 Also in our data, kin relations seem to be important: of our total of 267 women, fifty were related to one another. In most cases the degree of relationship was close; there were mothers and daughters, sisters and in-laws. It was the rule rather than the exception that the men of these families also participated in the Red Guard, whether as a husband, a father, a brother, or a son. The families often shared the same ideological worldview and even encouraged one another to join. For example, seventeen-year-old Ida Perkiö said her brother had advised her to join the Guard. Anna Kivi explained that her own husband, who worked for the Guard, had asked her to join since they did not have children and she was not employed.Footnote 72
We selected the Aronen family (Figure 5) for a closer analysis since they played an exceptionally remarkable role in the district. Six women from this single family were prosecuted. They were suspected of treason not only due to their own actions but also due to the important positions of the men in the family. For example, Nestori Aronen, Anna Aronen's son and the husband of Selma Aronen, was the right hand of the Red's chief procurator and worked in the headquarters of the Red administration. But these women were not simple bystanders. For example, Selma had been a key figure in the pre-war labour movement. She was the chairwoman of the women's section of the local workers’ association and thus had influence and access to information.Footnote 73 Anna, in turn, lived in a house that also served as the headquarters first of the workers’ association and later of the local Red Guard. She was able to acquire information and pass that on to her acquaintances.Footnote 74
All the husbands of these women were members of the Red Guard. The Aronen brothers were leaders of the local Guard, and after the war the entire family were branded as rebels and charged with treason. None of the six women had joined the Red Guard, but they had supported it. They were accused of agitating for rebellion and of hiding guns and stolen property. Only the two youngest women, Katri and Ellen, were acquitted on all charges. The other four were sentenced to penal servitude, though they were all released within a year in general amnesties.
Figure 6 focuses on the social network of the Aronen family by dimming all nodes and edges other than those around its members, thus highlighting the central position of the Aronen clan in our network. The Aronen family are visualized in red, the members of their ego networks are marked in blue, and their neighbours are visualized in cyan. In total this “Aronen network” was at most only two steps removed from 143 (54 per cent) of the 267 women in our sample and covered – as the visualization evidences – the core geographical area located in the central districts of Pori (see also Figure 2).
The central position of the members of the Aronen family is supported also by network measures. We use the closeness centrality measure to analyse a woman's structural position in the network. Closeness centrality measures the mean distance from a node to other nodes in the network, thus providing information on how easily a node can reach other nodes in the network, or, in other words, how close a node is to all other nodes in the network.Footnote 75 Normally, closeness centrality is standardized on a scale from 0 to 1, where 0 indicates an isolated node and 1 a node having a direct connection to all other nodes in the network. By definition, nodes with a higher closeness centrality might have better access to information at other nodes or more direct influence on other nodes.
Closeness centrality measures of the six members of the Aronen family support their central position in the network of the Red women. Ellen Aronen, whose ego network covers Pori's central districts with forty-six connections, has a closeness centrality of 0.340, the highest in the family. Jenny, Selma, Vendla, and Katri Aronen each have a closeness centrality of 0.215, followed by Anna Aronen with 0.212. An interesting observation is that all women with the highest closeness centrality measures (from 0.355 to 0.343) are Ellen Aronen's ego connections. Hence, Ellen Aronen not only had better access to information and more direct influence on other women, she could also mobilize women in her direct neighbourhood in order to gain even more influence.
As these results evidence, the Aronen family were able to reach practically all the members of the most central network in the Pori region. This confirms a central insight from network analysis, which is that most networks tend to have certain key individuals – in our case the Aronen family – with multiple connections.Footnote 76 At the same time, the Aronen network confirms the importance of weak links: the kinship network of the Aronen family was rather small, but it had access to a huge network of associates, enabling the Aronens to reach women in most central associations and districts.
As can be seen, these women were politically active and had wide connections through the labour movement. This was important since their husbands were in leading positions and had knowledge of the revolution's progress. Thus, these women could pass on information through their networks to other women in the district. Kinship with the Aronens proved to be a dangerous connection after the war, as was highlighted in the court statements. For instance, Anna was described as a mother “who has raised sons who have stirred up the whole world ‘to rebellion’”.Footnote 77 In Jenny's papers it was claimed that “she is one of the socialist villains of Aronen”.Footnote 78 The entire family were labelled Red rebels. This was common after the Finnish Civil War; the acts of one family member could define the reputation of the entire family in the eyes of society. In addition, membership of a trade union or socialist association was considered an aggravating factor after the war since the Social Democratic Party was regarded as a scapegoat for the rebellion. Thus, the Aronen women had both their political background and their kinship with revolutionary leaders on their crime sheet.
The experiences of 1918 also united these women more strongly. Both Anna and Jenny lost their husbands in the aftermath of the war. The men died in POW camps. Jenny moved back home to live with her mother. Selma, Vendla, and Katri also needed support since their husbands were given long sentences and were not released until the 1920s. They all had young children; Vendla gave birth to a baby in the autumn of 1918.Footnote 79 In a crisis like this, support networks were of the utmost importance. The support of people with similar ideas was crucial since White society was hostile and distrustful of the Reds. Evidence of this negative attitude can be found, for example, in a letter that two schoolmistresses and the mistress of a wealthy house sent to the authorities concerning Selma Aronen:
She has always been the first one to sing and rage behind the red cloth and has agitated others to strikes and riots. She has raised her children to be snoopers both in school and in the village. […] From many years’ experience we know that Selma Aronen's secret and public actions are very dangerous to society.Footnote 80
The women of the Aronen family continued to have political influence even after the Civil War. And this happened rather soon. Despite the sentences, the social democrats were again the largest party in parliament in 1919. Many of the reforms they had demanded in 1917 were legislated after the war. Thus, the Civil War ended in a compromise. It is quite unique for the losers of a war to be able to gain their demands so soon afterwards.Footnote 81 At the beginning of the 1920s, the labour movement split into social democrats and communists. Three women from the Aronen family formed a new communist association for women in the Pori region and became members of the board. They later became local communist leaders. All the younger women in the family later became communists; only Anna remained a social democrat.Footnote 82
This article had two main objectives. First, we wanted to empirically study Red women's social relations at different levels. Second, we wanted to test how historical network analysis could be applied as a tool for distant reading in order to quantify and model social networks.
Our analysis shows that the Red women came as closely tied groups from certain quarters of the town. Furthermore, membership of workers’ associations and the local trade union branches united women from different neighbourhoods. The trade union memberships prove that the women worked in the same workplaces. They were thus able to meet daily and also to discuss the revolution together and ponder whether to join the Guard or not. Put in more theoretical terms, daily encounters with politically like-minded sisters strengthened emotional closeness, which broadened the connections of these women and provided both information and support, helping them to survive after the war. Our results support the hypothesis that there was a strong social basis for Red activity. Socialist activity in the spring of 1918 in Finland was not only an outcome of ideological manipulation.
Our results support the assumption that membership of a trade union branch or workers’ association was an important factor in support for the Red Guard. Previous studies have evidenced this phenomenon with regard to men. Our study indicates a similar tendency among women. There were thus strong similarities between the two genders with regard to the impact of organizational membership.
The application of network analysis helped us to improve our understanding of the social cohesion among these Red women, and of how organizational membership strengthened the geographical connectedness between different districts. Our analysis showed that the most active people lived in different districts and were connected by membership. At the same time, this network analysis helps us to understand why not all women needed to be members of labour organizations in order to gain access to political information.
The network structure underlines the importance of geographical closeness. Since the most active women lived in various districts, they acted as mediators and gatekeepers between the organizations and non-members in their own districts. Another interesting finding is that network components correlate with geographical distance to Pori city centre. Those districts further than walking distance from Pori city centre form isolated localities in our network structure. A closer look at the giant component in our network structure reveals that this component brings together women living close together in Pori's city centre.
Our findings also provide support for the relevance of geographical closeness as a factor intensifying social interaction patterns. Although we cannot document how the women included in our material really interacted, or how intense connections between them were, the idea of emotional closeness fostered by geographical and social closeness gains support from the findings of previous studies on kinship and elite networks.
The use of HNA has yielded many interesting and valuable insights into the social structure of Red women in the Pori region on the eve of the Civil War, but the real analytical power lies in combining the quantitative analysis with a qualitative interpretation. On the one hand, the network analysis helped us to identify important women in the network. On the other, through qualitative analysis we were able to reconstruct the historical context and thus explain why these individuals were so important in our networks.
In his critical article on historical network research published in 1998, Charles Wetherell listed three main reasons for the slow adoption by historians of quantitative, computational methods: a lack of familiarity with the conceptual orientation, the fact that the number of quantitatively oriented historians is so few, and the formidable requirements in relation to data in a discipline “plagued with an incomplete historical record and imperfect understandings of past social relations”.Footnote 83 This is also partly connected with the so-called cultural turn and microhistorical turn, both of which have diminished the role of quantitatively oriented research. This is alarming, since “the present status of digital history studies shows that the history project benefits from applying digital humanities tools to the study, obtaining new answers to old questions without denying the benefits of digital archives and methods”.Footnote 84 Our article combines the microhistorical approach with strong computational orientation. Since the method is rather independent of the amount of data used in the analysis, it can help researchers to cope with very much larger datasets containing information on social interaction, thus helping us gain new insights into the past.
To view supplementary material for this article, please visit https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020859019000336