Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T11:44:53.733Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

P66: A systematic review of measures of social connection for people living in long-term care homes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 February 2024

Hannah Chapman
Affiliation:
Division of Psychiatry, University College London, United Kingdom
Neha Dewan
Affiliation:
KITE-Toronto Rehabilitation Institute – University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
Jennifer Bethell
Affiliation:
KITE-Toronto Rehabilitation Institute – University Health Network, Toronto, Canada / Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
Madalena Liougas
Affiliation:
Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
Gill Livingston
Affiliation:
Division of Psychiatry, University College London, United Kingdom
Katherine S. McGilton
Affiliation:
KITE-Toronto Rehabilitation Institute – University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
Andrew Sommerlad
Affiliation:
Division of Psychiatry, University College London, United Kingdom

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Background:

Social connection is important for health, quality of life and care in long-term care (LTC) homes. However, research on how to improve social connection in LTC has been limited by lack of consensus on best approaches to measurement.

Research Objective:

We will present a systematic review of measures of social connection developed for use in LTC residents, which aims to identify all existing measures and evaluate their measurement properties including structural validity, internal consistency, reliability and construct validity.

Method:

We are following Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) systematic review methods. We searched multiple bibliographic databases from inception to November 2021 for studies that were conducted in LTC resident populations, quantified any aspect(s) of social connection, and reported at least one psychometric property for the measure(s) of social connection. We conducted a second targeted search in April 2022 based on our list of identified measures, supplemented with a list of measures used in previous research in this population. We are currently evaluating the measurement properties reported for each identified measure in accordance with COSMIN guidelines.

Preliminary results of the ongoing study:

We have identified 68 studies reporting on 35 measures used to assess multiple aspects of social connection in LTC homes. The majority (n=25) were measures of quality of life, wellbeing or life satisfaction, which included a social connection subdomain, whilst only 10 measures specifically target social connection. From our pooled evaluation of 20 measures to date, we have found that 20% (n=4) have sufficient evidence of structural validity, 15% (n=3) have sufficient internal consistency, 25% (n=5) have sufficient reliability, and 15% (n=3) have sufficient construct validity.

Conclusion:

Many measures have been used to assess social connection in LTC settings, but few are specifically designed for this purpose and they often have insufficient evidence for psychometric properties. This review will provide detailed evidence of the quality of these measures to enable future researchers to prioritise higher quality tools and will inform our development of a new person-centred social connection measurement tool for LTC residents in the Social Connection in Long-Term Care Home Residents (SONNET) study.

Type
Posters
Copyright
© International Psychogeriatric Association 2024