Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T08:33:52.568Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Men's vulnerability–women's resilience: from widowhood to late-life repartnering

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 December 2015

Chaya Koren
Chaya Koren*
Affiliation:
The School of Social Work and The Center for the Study of Society, University of Haifa, 199 Abba Hushi Blv., Mount Carmel, Haifa, Israel
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: Chaya Koren, The School of Social Work and The Center for the Study of Society, University of Haifa, 199 Abba Hushi Blv., Mount Carmel, Haifa 3498838, Israel. Phone: 972-54-6345876. Email: salsterk@gmail.com.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background:

The ongoing increase in life expectancy resulting in people living longer after the death of a lifelong spouse along with the stresses of widowhood is likely to increase the phenomenon of repartnering in old age. The aim of this article is to learn about the attributed meanings of late-life repartnering among older repartnered widows and widowers dealing with widowhood.

Methods:

The experiences of 27 couples (54 participants), in which both partners were widowed, were chosen from two larger studies on late-life repartnering: one took a dyadic perspective (interviewing both partners), and the other took an intergenerational approach (interviewing both partners and offspring). Criterion sampling in both studies used the criteria of widowers who repartnered above age 65 and widows above age 60, remarried or not, living separately, or under the same roof, and who had children and grandchildren from a lifelong marriage that had ended with the death of their spouse. All semi-structured interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed based on grounded theory principles and dyadic analysis adapted to families.

Results:

Present a grounded model indicating gender differences in dealing with the death of a lifelong spouse. Men tended to experience vulnerability whereas women tended to experience resilience.

Conclusions:

These findings make an innovative contribution by showing the reversal of gender inequality in old age, and gender differences between widows’ and widowers’ coping with widowhood, even though both repartnered. They are discussed in light of (critical) feminist gerontology including contribution to theory development and implications for practice.

Keywords

widowhoodgender differencesrepartneringresiliencevulnerabilityold age(critical) feminist gerontologyqualitative research
Type
Research Article
Information
International Psychogeriatrics , Volume 28 , Issue 5 , May 2016 , pp. 719 - 731
Copyright
Copyright © International Psychogeriatric Association 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, M. (2007). Rhetoric and (re)enforcement of the gender status quo women's rights and wedding bells: 19th-century pro-family. Journal of Family Issues, 28, 501. DOI: 10.1177/0192513x06297465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, K. M. (2010). How to achieve resilience as an older widower: turning points or gradual change? Ageing & Society, 30, 369–382.Google Scholar
Bennett, K. M., Arnott, L. and Soulsby, L. K. (2013). You’re not getting married for the moon and the stars: the uncertainties of older British widowers about the idea of new romantic relationships. Journal of Aging Studies, 27, 499–506.Google Scholar
Bennett, K. M., Smith, P. T. and Hughes, G. M. (2005). Coping, depressive feelings and gender differences in late life widowhood. Aging & Mental Health, 9, 348–353.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bonanno, G. A. (2004). Loss, trauma and human resilience: have we underestimated the human capacity to thrive after extremely aversive events? American Psychologist, 59, 20–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bonanno, G. A. (2012). Uses and abuses of the resilience construct: loss, trauma, and health-related adversities. Social Science & Medicine, 74, 753–756.Google Scholar
Brown, S. L., Lee, G. R. and Bulanda, J. R. (2006). Cohabitation among older adults: a national portrait. Journals of Gerontology: Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 61, S71–S79. doi: 10.1093/geronb/61.2.S71.Google Scholar
Calasanti, T. (2004). Feminist gerontology and old men. Journal of Gerontology, Social Sciences, 59B, S305–S314.Google Scholar
Carr, D. (2004a). The desire to date and remarry among older widows and widowers. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 1051–1068.Google Scholar
Carr, D. (2004b). Gender, pre-loss marital dependence, and older adults’ adjustment to widowhood. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 220–235.Google Scholar
Central Bureau of Statistics (CBS) Statistical abstracts of Israel (2014). Retrieved 5.1.15 http://www.cbs.gov.il/shnaton65/st02_04x.pdf; last accessed 5 January 2015.Google Scholar
Corcoun, P. and Nagar, A. (2010). Suicide and marital status in Northern Ireland. Social Psychiatric Epidemiology, 45, 795–800. DOI 10.1007/s00127-009-0120-7.Google Scholar
Davidson, K. (2001). Late life widowhood, selfishness and new partnership choices: a gendered perspective. Ageing and Society, 21, 297–317.Google Scholar
Davidson, K. (2002). Gender differences in new partnership choices and constraints for older widows and widowers. Ageing International, 27, 43–60.Google Scholar
Davidson, K. (2004). Why can't a man be more like a woman?: marital status and social networking of older men, Journal of Men Studies, 13, 25–43.Google Scholar
de Jong Gierveld, J. (2004). Remarriage, unmarried cohabitation, living apart together: partner relationships following bereavement or divorce. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 66, 236–243.Google Scholar
Eagly, A. H., Eaton, A., Rose, S. M., Riger, S. and McHugh, M. C. (2012). Feminism and psychology analysis of a half-century of research on women and gender. American Psychologist, 67, 211–230. DOI: 10.1037/a0027260.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eisikovits, Z. and Koren, C. (2010). Approaches and outcomes of dyadic qualitative analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 20, 1642–1655. DOI: 10.1177/1049732310376520.Google Scholar
Freixas, A., Luque, B. and Reina, A. (2012). Critical feminist gerontology: in the back room of research. Journal of Women & Aging, 24, 44–58.Google Scholar
Gallopin, G. C. (2006). Linkages between vulnerability, resilience, and adaptive capacity. Global Environmental Change, 16, 293–303.Google Scholar
Hansson, R.O. and Stroebe, M. S. (2007). Bereavement in Late Life: Coping, Adaptation, and Developmental Influences. Washington DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Hooymen, N., Browne, C. V., Ray, R. and Richadson, V. (2002). Feminist gerontology and the life course: policy, research and teaching issues. Gerontology and Geriatricts Education, 22, 3–26.Google Scholar
Koren, C. and Eisikovits, Z. (2011). Life beyond the planned script: accounts and secrecy of older persons living in second couplehood in old age in a society in transition. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 28, 44–63, DOI: 10.1177/0265407510385430.Google Scholar
Koren, C. and Lipman-Schibi, S. (2014). “Not a replacement”: emotional experiences and practical consequences of Israeli second couplehood stepfamilies constructed in old age. Journal of Aging Studies, 31, 70–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koren, C. and Lowenstein, A. (2008). Late-life widowhood and meaning in life. Ageing International, 32, 140–155.Google Scholar
Koren, C. and Simhi, S. (2015). “As long as it's good”: an intergenerational family perspective of bridging gaps between reality and ideality of second couplehood in old age as a problem and as a solution. Ageing and Society, OnLine First. Epublished ahead of print, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X14001482.Google Scholar
Kvale, S. and Brikmann, S. (2008). InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks California: Sage Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
Lavee, Y. and Katz, R. (2003). The family in Israel: between tradition and modernity. Marriage and Family Review, 35, 198–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin-Matthews, A. (2011). Revisiting widowhood in later life: changes in patterns and profiles, advances in research and understandings. Canadian Journal on Aging, 30, 339–354.Google Scholar
Ong, A. D., Fuller-Rowell, T. E. and Bonanno, G. A. (2010). Prospective predictors of positive emotions following spousal loss. Psychology and Aging, 25, 653–660.Google Scholar
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods, 3rd edn, California: Sage Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
Ray, R. (1996). A postmodern perspective on feminist gerontology. The Gerontologist, 36, 674–680.Google Scholar
Silver, C. B. (2003). Gendered identities in old age: towards (de)gendering? Journal of Aging Studies, 17, 379–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sorell, G. T. and Montgomery, M. J. (2001). Feminist perspectives on Erikson's theory: their relevance for contemporary identity development research. Identity: An International Journal of Theory and Research, 1, 97–128. DOI: 10.1207/S1532706XID0102_01.Google Scholar
Spradley, J. P. (1979). The Ethnographic Interview. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.Google Scholar
Strauss, A. and Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques, California: Sage.Google Scholar
Stroebe, M., Stroebe, S. and Schut, H. (2001). Gender differences in adjustment to bereavement: an empirical and theoretical review. Review of General Psychology, 5 (1), 62–83.Google Scholar