Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T13:24:48.041Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Family and Physicians' Views of Surrogate Decision-Making: The Roles and How to Choose

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2005

Michel Silberfeld
Affiliation:
Competency Clinic, Baycrest Centre for Geriatric Care, North York, Ontario, Canada Department of Psychiatry, Centre for Bioethics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Rivka Grundstein-Amado
Affiliation:
Competency Clinic, Baycrest Centre for Geriatric Care, North York, Ontario, Canada
Derek Stephens
Affiliation:
Competency Clinic, Baycrest Centre for Geriatric Care, North York, Ontario, Canada
Raisa Deber
Affiliation:
Department of Health Administration, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Abstract

Physicians and family members were compared on the roles played in surrogate decision-making and their views as to how choices should be made by surrogate decision-makers. Thirty-six family members of patients with Alzheimer's disease, 35 family members of patients with schizophrenia, and 34 physicians from a diversity of specialties were the respondents. There was general agreement that shared decision-making was preferred. Physicians seem to make surrogate decisions in accordance with contemporary views about their roles. Families believed they had a strong subjective appreciation of the patient's overall good. The burden of decision-making was geater for families, but that depended to some degree on the diagnosis of the patient.

Type
Studies on Cognition and Dementia
Copyright
© 1996 International Psychogeriatric Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)