Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-qlrfm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T16:04:33.734Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Age and premorbid intelligence suppress complaint–performance congruency in raw score measures of memory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 October 2011

Matt R. Merema ,
Craig P. Speelman ,
Elizabeth A. Kaczmarek  and
Jonathan K. Foster
Matt R. Merema*
Affiliation:
School of Psychology and Social Science, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Australia
Craig P. Speelman
Affiliation:
School of Psychology and Social Science, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Australia
Elizabeth A. Kaczmarek
Affiliation:
School of Psychology and Social Science, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Australia
Jonathan K. Foster
Affiliation:
School of Psychology and Speech Pathology, Curtin University, Bentley, Australia
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: Matt R. Merema, School of Psychology and Social Science, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup 6027, Australia. Phone: +61-8-9562-7905. Email address: mmerema@our.ecu.edu.au.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background: We aimed to examine the role of age and premorbid intelligence (IQ) in suppressing the relationship between subjective memory complaints (SMCs) and raw score memory performance.

Methods: We used a community sample of older adults aged 66–90 years (N = 121) to test whether the inclusion of age and a premorbid IQ measure in multiple regression analyses increased semipartial correlations of raw score memory performance in predicting SMCs. Rank contrast correlations were also carried out to observe how age and premorbid IQ are related to complaint–performance congruency. Measures utilized in the study included the Memory Functioning Questionnaire (for SMCs), Visual Reproduction and Logical Memory Subtests (memory performance), and the National Adult Reading Test (premorbid IQ).

Results: Inclusion of age and premorbid IQ in the multiple regression analyses increased semipartial correlations for all raw score measures of memory. Both age and premorbid IQ were significantly related to complaint–performance congruency, whereby older participants and those with lower premorbid IQ scores rated their memory abilities more leniently than younger and higher premorbid IQ participants.

Conclusion: The results suggest differences in age and premorbid IQ play a small role in suppressing the relationship between SMCs and memory performance when utilizing raw score measures of memory.

Keywords

subjective memory complaintolder adultsclassical suppressionsuppressor variablevisual memoryverbal memory
Type
Research Article
Information
International Psychogeriatrics , Volume 24 , Issue 3 , March 2012 , pp. 397 - 405
Copyright
Copyright © International Psychogeriatric Association 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Conger, A. J. (1974). A revised definition for suppressor variables: a guide to their identification and interpretation. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 34, 35–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costa, P. T. and McCrae, R. R. (1992). Professional Manual: Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI). Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.Google Scholar
Crook, T. H. and Larrabee, G. J. (1992). Normative data on the self-rating scale for evaluating memory in everyday life. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 7, 41–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frerichs, R. J. and Tuokko, H. A. (2006). Reliable change scores and their relation to perceived change in memory: implications for the diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 21, 109–115.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frick, A., Wahlin, T. R., Pachana, N. A. and Byrne, G. J. (2011). Relationships between the National Adult Reading Test and memory. Neuropsychology, 25, 397–403.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gilewski, M. J., Zelinski, E. M. and Schaie, K. W. (1990). The memory functioning questionnaire for assessment of memory complaints in adulthood and old age. Psychology and Aging, 5, 482–490.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jorm, A. F. (2004). The Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly (IQCODE): a review. International Psychogeriatrics, 16, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jorm, A. F., Christensen, H., Korten, A. E., Jacomb, P. A. and Henderson, A. S. (2001). Memory complaints as a precursor of memory impairment in older people: a longitudinal analysis over 7–8 years. Psychological Medicine, 31, 441–449.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kiely, K. M., Luszcz, M. A., Piguet, O., Christensen, H., Bennett, H. and Anstey, K. J. (2011). Functional equivalence of the National Adult Reading Test (NART) and Schonell reading tests and NART norms in the Dynamic Analyses to Optimise Ageing (DYNOPTA) project. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 33, 410–421.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levy-Cushman, J. and Abeles, N. (1998). Memory complaints in the able elderly. Clinical Gerontologist, 19, 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovibond, S. H. and Lovibond, P. F. (1995). Manual for the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales. Sydney, Australia: Psychology Foundation.Google Scholar
Maassen, G. H. and Bakker, A. B. (2001). Suppressor variables in path models: definitions and interpretations. Sociological Methods and Research, 30, 241–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendes, T. et al. (2008). Memory complaints in healthy young and elderly adults: reliability of memory reporting. Aging and Mental Health, 12, 177–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minett, T. S., Da Silva, R. V., Ortiz, K. Z. and Bertolucci, P. H. (2008). Subjective memory complaints in an elderly sample: a cross-sectional study. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 23, 49–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, H. E. (1982). National Adult Reading Test (NART): Test Manual. Windsor, ON, Canada: NFER-Nelson.Google Scholar
Pearman, A. and Storandt, M. (2004). Predictors of subjective memory in older adults. Journals of Gerontology, 59B, 4–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearman, A. and Storandt, M. (2005). Self-discipline and self-consciousness predict subjective memory in older adults. Journals of Gerontology, 60B, 153–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potter, G. G., Hartman, M. and Ward, T. (2009). Perceived stress and everyday memory complaints among older adult women. Anxiety, Stress, and Coping, 22, 475–481.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schmidt, I. W., Berg, I. J. and Deelman, B. G. (2001). Relations between subjective evaluations of memory and objective memory performance. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 93, 761–776.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sinnett, E. R. and Holen, M. C. (1999). Assessment of memory functioning among an aging sample. Psychological Reports, 84, 339–350.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stein, S., Linn, M., Stein, E. M. and Linn, B. S. (1983). The impact of environment on perception of stress and symptoms of the elderly. Activities, Adaptation, and Aging, 3, 39–48.Google Scholar
Velicer, W. F. (1978). Suppressor variables and the semipartial correlation coefficient. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 38, 953–958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wechsler, D. (2009). WMS-IV: Administration and Scoring Manual. Sydney, Australia: Pearson.Google Scholar
Zandi, T. (2004). Relationship between subjective memory complaints, objective memory performance, and depression among older adults. American Journal of Alzheimer's Disease and Other Dementias, 19, 353–360.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed