Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-78bd46657c-5628d Total loading time: 0.157 Render date: 2021-05-08T20:56:06.633Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true }

The challenges of shared decision making in dementia care networks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 September 2016

Leontine Groen-van de Ven
Affiliation:
Research Group Innovating with Older Adults, Centre of Expertise in Health Care and Social Work, Windesheim University of Applied Sciences, 8000 GB, Zwolle, the Netherlands
Carolien Smits
Affiliation:
Research Group Innovating with Older Adults, Centre of Expertise in Health Care and Social Work, Windesheim University of Applied Sciences, 8000 GB, Zwolle, the Netherlands
Marijke Span
Affiliation:
Research Group Innovating with Older Adults, Centre of Expertise in Health Care and Social Work, Windesheim University of Applied Sciences, 8000 GB, Zwolle, the Netherlands
Jan Jukema
Affiliation:
Research Group Innovating with Older Adults, Centre of Expertise in Health Care and Social Work, Windesheim University of Applied Sciences, 8000 GB, Zwolle, the Netherlands
Krista Coppoolse
Affiliation:
Research Centre Innovations in Care, Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences, 3001 HA, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
Jacomine de Lange
Affiliation:
Research Centre Innovations in Care, Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences, 3001 HA, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
Jan Eefsting
Affiliation:
Department of Nursing Home Medicine, EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, Free University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands Zonnehuisgroep IJssel-Vecht, 8003 CA, Zwolle, the Netherlands
Myrra Vernooij-Dassen
Affiliation:
Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare (IQ healthcare), Radboud Alzheimer Centre, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, the Netherlands The Netherlands and Kalorama Foundation, 6573 ZH, Beek-Ubbergen, the Netherlands
Corresponding

Abstract

Background:

Decision making is an important part of managing one's life with dementia. Shared decision making is the preferred way of involving people in decisions. Our study aimed to describe the challenges of shared decision making in dementia care networks.

Methods:

A multi-perspective qualitative study using face-to-face interviews with 113 respondents in 23 care networks in the Netherlands consisting of 23 people with dementia, 44 of their informal caregivers, and 46 of their professional caregivers. The interview guide addressed the decision topics, who were involved in the decision making and their contributions to the decision making. We used content analysis to delineate categories and themes.

Results:

The themes and categories that emerged are: (1) adapting to a situation of diminishing independence, which includes the continuous changes in the care network, resulting in shifting decision-making roles and the need for anticipating future decisions; and (2) tensions in network interactions which result from different perspectives and interests and which require reaching agreement about what constitutes a problem by exchanging information in the care network.

Conclusion:

The challenges in dementia care networks relate to all dimensions of social health. They have implications for a model of shared decision making in dementia care networks. Such a model requires flexibility regarding changing capabilities to preserve the autonomy of the person with dementia. It needs working towards a shared view about what constitutes a problem in the situation. It asks for professionals to advocate for the involvement of people with dementia by helping them participate in ways that strengthen their remaining capacities.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Psychogeriatric Association 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

References

Blanc, X. et al. (2014). Publication trends of shared decision making in 15 high impact medical journals: a full-text review with bibliometric analysis. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 14, 19. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-14-71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boyle, G. (2014). Recognising the agency of people with dementia. Disability & Society, 29, 11301144. doi: 10.1080/09687599.2014.910108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corbin, J. and Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded theory research: procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13, 322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coyne, I. T. (1997). Sampling in qualitative research. Purposeful and theoretical sampling; merging or clear bounderies? Journal of Advanced Nursing, 26, 623630CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Creswell, J. (1998). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Traditions. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
Elo, S. and Kyngas, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62, 107115. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Entwistle, V. and Watt, I. S. (2006). Patient involvement in treatment decision-making: the case for a broader conceptual framework. Patient Education and Counseling, 63, 268278. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2006.05.002.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Epstein, R. M. and Gramling, R. E. (2013). What is shared in shared decision making? Complex decisions when the evidence is unclear. Medical Care Research and Review, 70, 94S–112S. doi: 10.1177/1077558712459216.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feinberg, L. F. and Whitlatch, C. J. (2001). Are persons with cognitive impairment able to state consistent choice? The Gerontologist, 41, 374382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fetherstonhaugh, D., Tarzia, L. and Nay, R. (2013). Being central to decision making means I am still here!: the essence of decision making for people with dementia. Journal of Aging Studies, 27, 143150. doi: 10.1016/j.jaging.2012.12.007.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Groen-van de Ven, L. et al. (2016). Decision trajectories in dementia care networks: decisions and related key-events. Research on Aging, 133. doi: 10.1177/0164027516656741.Google ScholarPubMed
Hamann, J. et al. (2011). Patient participation in medical and social decisions in Alzheimer's disease. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 59, 20452052. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03661.x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huber, M. et al. (2011). How should we define health? British Medical Journal, 343, d4163d4163. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d4163.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, J. K., Barach, P. and Vernooij-Dassen, M. (2012). Conducting a multicentre and multinational qualitative study on patient transitions. BMJ Quality & Safety, 21 (Suppl. 1), i22i28. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001197.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kendall, M. et al. (2009). Use of multiperspective qualitative interviews to understand patients’ and carers’ beliefs, experiences, and needs. British Medical Journal, 399, 196199. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b3702.Google Scholar
Livingston, G. et al. (2010). Making decisions for people with dementia who lack capacity: qualitative study of family carers in UK. BMJ, 341, c4184. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c4184.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meulenbroek, O. et al. (2010). Informed consent in dementia research. Legislation, theoretical concepts and how to assess capacity to consent. European Geriatric Medicine, 1, 5863. doi: 10.1016/j.eurger.2010.01.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, L. M., Whitlatch, C. J. and Lyons, K. S. (2014). Shared decision-making in dementia: a review of patient and family carer involvement. Dementia. Epublished ahead of print, doi: 10.1177/1471301214555542.Google ScholarPubMed
Montori, V. M., Gafni, A. and Charles, C. (2006). A shared treatment decision-making approach between patients with chronic conditions and their clinicians: the case of diabetes. Health Expectations, 9, 2536. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2006.00359.x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murphy, K., Jordan, F., Hunter, A., Cooney, A. and Casey, D. (2015). Articulating the strategies for maximising the inclusion of people with dementia in qualitative research studies. Dementia, 14, 800824. doi: 10.1177/1471301213512489.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nygård, L. (2006). How can we get access to the experiences of people with dementia? Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 13, 101112. doi: 10.1080/11038120600723190.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peisah, D., Sorinmade, O. A., Mitchell, L. and Hertogh, C. M. P. M. (2013). Decisional capacity: toward an inclusionary approach. International Psychogeriatrics, 25, 15711579. doi: 10.1017/S1041610213001014.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Samsi, K. and Manthorpe, J. (2013). Everyday decision-making in dementia: findings from a longitudinal interviewstudy of people with dementia and family carers. International Psychogeriatrics, 25, 949961. doi: 10.1017/S1041610213000306.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smebye, K. L., Kirkevold, M. and Engedal, K. (2012). How do persons with dementia participate in decision making related to health and daily care? A multi-case study. BMC Health Services Research, 12, 123. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Span, M. et al. (2015). An interactive web tool for facilitating shared decision-making in dementia care networks: a field study. Frontiers in Aging Neurosciences, 7, 128. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2015.00128 10.3389/fnagi.2015.00128.Google ScholarPubMed
St-Amant, O. et al. (2014). Making care decisions in home-based dementia care: why context matters. Canadian Journal on Aging, 31, 423434. doi: 10.1017/S0714980812000396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stacey, D., Légaré, F., Pouliot, S., Kryworuchko, J. and Dunn, S. (2010). Shared decision making models to inform an interprofessional perspective on decision making: a theory analysis. Patient Education and Counseling, 80, 164172. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2009.10.015.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Su, C. T., McMahan, R. D., Williams, B. A., Sharma, R. K. and Sudore, R. L. (2014). Family matters : effects of birth order, culture, and family dynamics on surrogate decision-making. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 62, 175182. 10.1111/jgs.12610.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vernooij-Dassen, M. and Jeon, Y.-H. (2016). Social health and dementia: the power of human capabilities. International Psychogeriatrics, 28, 701703. doi: 10.1017/S1041610216000260.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wolfs, C. A. et al. (2012). Rational decision-making about treatment and care in dementia: a contradiction in terms? Patient Education and Counseling, 87, 4348. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.07.023.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

The challenges of shared decision making in dementia care networks
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

The challenges of shared decision making in dementia care networks
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

The challenges of shared decision making in dementia care networks
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *