Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-94d59 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T13:22:26.654Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Trade Competition and Domestic Pollution: A Panel Study, 1980–2003

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 July 2010

Xun Cao
Affiliation:
University of Essex, United Kingdom. E-mail: caox@essex.ac.uk
Aseem Prakash
Affiliation:
University of Washington, Seattle. E-mail: aseem@u.washington.edu
Get access

Abstract

This research note examines whether trade competition abets regulatory races in the environmental area. To analyze trade competition, we develop a new measure, structural equivalence, which assesses competitive threats that a country faces from other countries whose firms export the same products to the same destination countries. Employing this new measure, we analyze air pollution intensity (sulfur dioxide or SO2) and water pollution intensity (biochemical oxygen demand or BOD) for a panel of 140 countries for the time period 1980–2003. We find that trade competition is a significant predictor of water pollution intensity among structurally equivalent countries. We then test separately whether trade competition abets upward and downward regulatory races. We find that in the case of water pollution, countries respond symmetrically to downward and upward races, that is, they follow their structurally equivalent competitor countries both when they ratchet down their regulations and when they ratchet up regulations. In the case of air pollution, however, countries are responsive to downward policy changes only in competitor countries.

Type
Research Notes
Copyright
Copyright © The IO Foundation 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Andonova, Liliana, Mansfield, Edward D., and Milner, Helen V.. 2007. International Trade and Environmental Policy in the Postcommunist World. Comparative Political Studies 40 (7):782807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antweiler, Werner, Copeland, Brian R., and Taylor, M. Scott. 2001. Is Free Trade Good for the Environment? American Economic Review 91 (4):877908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bättig, Michèle, and Bernauer, Thomas. 2009. National Institutions and Global Public Goods: Are Democracies More Cooperative in Climate Change Policy? International Organization 63 (2):281308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, Nathaniel, Gleditsch, Kristian S., and Beardsley, Kyle. 2006. Space Is More Than Geography: Using Spatial Econometrics in the Study of Political Economy. International Studies Quarterly 50 (1):2744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernauer, Thomas, and Caduff, Ladina. 2004. In Whose Interest? Pressure Group Politics, Economic Competition and Environmental Regulation. Journal of Public Policy 24 (1):99126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernauer, Thomas, and Koubi, Vally. 2009. Effects of Political Institutions on Air Quality. Ecological Economics 68 (5):1355–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borgatti, Stephen P., and Everett, Martin G.. 1992. Notions of Position in Social Network Analysis. Sociological Methodology 22:135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, Matthew A., and Elliott, Robert J. R.. 2003. Do Environmental Regulations Influence Trade Patterns? Testing Old and New Trade Theories. World Economy 26 (8):1163–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Soysa, Indra, and Neumayer, Eric. 2005. False Prophet or Genuine Savior? Assessing the Effects of Economic Openness on Sustainable Development, 1980–99. International Organization 59 (3):731–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drezner, Daniel W. 2001. Globalization and Policy Convergence. International Studies Review 3 (1):5378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elkins, Zachary, Guzman, Andrew T., and Simmons, Beth A.. 2006. Competing for Capital: The Diffusion of Bilateral Investment Treaties, 1960–2000. International Organization 60 (4):811–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feenstra, Robert C., Lipsey, Robert E., Deng, Haiyan, Ma, Alyson C., and Mo, Hengyong. 2005. World Trade Flows: 1962–2000. Working Paper 11040. Cambridge, Mass.: National Bureau of Economic Research.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiorino, Daniel J. 2006. The New Environmental Regulation. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Franzese, Robert J. Jr., and Hays, Jude C.. 2006. Spatial Econometric Models of Cross-Sectional Interdependence in Political Science Panel and Time-Series-Cross-Section Data. Political Analysis 15 (2):140–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franzese, Robert J. Jr., and Hays, Jude C.. 2008. Interdependence in Comparative Politics: Substance, Theory, Empirics, Substance. Comparative Political Studies 41 (4/5):742–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fredriksson, Per G., and Millimet, Daniel L.. 2002. Strategic Interaction and the Determinants of Environmental Policy Across U.S. States. Journal of Urban Economics 51 (1):101–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, Wayne B., and Shadbegian, Ronald J.. 1995. Pollution Abatement Costs, Regulation, and Plant-Level Productivity. Working Paper 4994. Cambridge, Mass.: National Bureau of Economic Research.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guler, Isen, Guillén, Mauro, and MacPherson, John Muir. 2002. Global Competition, Institutions, and the Diffusion of Organizational Practices: The International Spread of ISO 9000 Quality Standards. Administrative Science Quarterly 47 (2):207–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaffe, Adam B., Peterson, Steven, Portney, Paul, and Stavins, Robert. 1995. Environmental Regulation and the Competitiveness of U.S. Manufacturing: What Does the Evidence Tell Us? Journal of Economic Literature 33 (1):132–63.Google Scholar
Kahler, Miles. 1998. Modeling Races to the Bottom. Manuscript. Available at ⟨http://irps.ucsd.edu/assets/014/6739.pdf⟩. Accessed 2 April 2010.Google Scholar
Konisky, David M. 2007. Regulatory Competition and Environmental Enforcement: Is There a Race to the Bottom? American Journal of Political Science 51 (4):853–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lake, David A., and Powell, Robert. 1999. Strategic Choice and International Relations. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrence, Robert Z. 1996. Regionalism, Multilateralism, and Deeper Integration. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Lee, Chang Kil, and Strang, David. 2006. The International Diffusion of Public-Sector Downsizing: Network Emulation and Theory-Driven Learning. International Organization 60 (4):883909.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Quan, and Reuveny, Rafael. 2006. Democracy and Environmental Degradation. International Studies Quarterly 50 (4):935–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lopez, Ramon. 2003. The Policy Roots of Socioeconomic Stagnation and Environmental Imposition: Latin America 1950–2000. World Development 31 (2):259–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahutga, Matthew C. 2006. The Persistence of Structural Inequality? A Network Analysis of International Trade, 1965–2000. Social Forces 84 (4):1863–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nemeth, Roger J., and Smith, David A.. 1985. International Trade and World-System Structure: A Multiple Network Analysis. Review (Fernand Braudel Center) 8:517–60.Google Scholar
Perkins, Richard, and Neumayer, Eric. 2008. Fostering Environment-Efficiency Through Transnational Linkages? Trajectories of CO2 and SO2, 1980–2000. Environment and Planning A 40 (12):2970–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plümper, Thomas, and Neumayer, Eric. 2010. Model Specification in the Analysis of Spatial Dependence. European Journal of Political Research 49:418–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potoski, Matthew, and Prakash, Aseem. 2005. Green Clubs and Voluntary Governance: ISO 14001 and Firms' Regulatory Compliance. American Journal of Political Science 49 (2):235–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prakash, Aseem, and Potoski, M.. 2006. Racing to the Bottom? Globalization, Environmental Governance, and ISO 14001. American Journal of Political Science 50 (2):350–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmons, Beth, and Elkins, Zachary. 2004. The Globalization of Liberalization: Policy Diffusion in the International Political Economy. American Political Science Review 98 (1):171–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, David A., and White, Douglas R.. 1992. Structure and Dynamics of the Global Economy: Network Analysis of International Trade 1965–1980. Social Forces 70 (4):857–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snyder, David, and Kick, Edward L.. 1979. Structural Position in the World System and Economic Growth, 1955–1970: A Multiple-Network Analysis of Transnational Interactions. American Journal of Sociology 84 (5):10961126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern, David I. 2005. Global Sulfur Emissions from 1850 to 2000. Chemosphere 58 (2):163–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tobey, James A. 1990. The Effects of Domestic Environmental Policies on Patterns of World Trade: An Empirical Test. Kyklos 43 (2):191209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD). 2002. World Investment Report. Geneva, Switzerland: UNCTAD.Google Scholar
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD). 2008. Foreign Direct Investment Database. Available at ⟨http://www.unctad.org/Templates/Page.asp?intItemID=1923⟩. Accessed 2 April 2010.Google Scholar
United Nations. 2008. Comtrade database. Available at ⟨http://comtrade.un.org/⟩. Accessed 2 April 2010.Google Scholar
Vogel, David. 1995. Trading Up: Consumer and Environmental Regulation in a Global Economy. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
World Bank. 2008. World Development Indicators. Available at ⟨http://data.worldbank.org/data-catalog⟩. Accessed 11 February 2008.Google Scholar
York, Richard, Rosa, Eugene, and Dietz, Thomas. 2003. Footprints on the Earth: The Environmental Consequences of Modernity. American Sociological Review 68 (2):279300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar