Skip to main content Accessibility help
Hostname: page-component-59b7f5684b-s82fj Total loading time: 0.39 Render date: 2022-09-28T08:06:38.224Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "displayNetworkTab": true, "displayNetworkMapGraph": false, "useSa": true } hasContentIssue true

Congressional Politics of Financing the International Monetary Fund

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 April 2006

J. Lawrence Broz
University of California, San Diego,
Michael Brewster Hawes
University of California, San Diego,
Get access


We address the question of how international public goods are financed by analyzing voting in the U.S. Congress on legislation to increase the U.S. contribution to the International Monetary Fund (IMF). We argue that legislators are more likely to vote in favor of an increase (1) the more campaign contributions they obtain from banks that specialize in international lending, and (2) the greater the share of high-skilled “proglobalization” workers in their districts. The first argument supports the inference that a financially strong IMF mitigates the risks of international lending, to the benefit of the lending banks. The second reflects our claim that voters view the IMF as a positive force for global economic integration that—following Stolper-Samuelson reasoning—benefits high-skilled workers. Lastly, we analyze IMF loan decisions and find modest support for the claim that IMF policy reflects the interests of major international banks. Overall, our results suggest that private actors within the United States have individual stakes in funding the IMF.We presented earlier versions of this paper at the 8th Annual International Society for New Institutional Economics Conference (ISNIE), Tucson, Ariz., September–October 2004, and at the Delegation to International Organization Conference, Del Mar, Calif., September 2003. We thank participants for comments. We also thank Michael Hiscox, Mathew McCubbins, J. R. DeShazo, David Lake, Jeffry Frieden, James Vreeland, William R. Clark, Erica Gould, Joseph Joyce, Devesh Kapur, Louis Pauly, Shanker Satyanath, Beth Simmons, and Michael Tierney for suggestions; and Mark Farrales and Molly James for excellent research assistance.

Research Article
© 2006 The IO Foundation and Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)



Baldwin, Robert E., and Christopher S. Magee. 2000. Congressional Trade Votes: From NAFTA Approval to Fast-Track Defeat. Washington, D.C.: Institute for International Economics.
Bailey, Michael. 2001. Quiet Influence: The Representation of Diffuse Interests on Trade Policy, 1983–1994. Legislative Studies Quarterly 26 (1):4580.Google Scholar
Barro, Robert J., and Jong-Wha Lee. 2002. IMF Programs: Who Is Chosen and What Are the Effects? NBER Working Paper 8951. Cambridge, Mass.: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Beaulieu, Eugene. 2002. The Stopler-Samuelson Theorem Faces Congress. Review of International Economics 10 (2):33754.Google Scholar
Bhagwati, Jagdish N. 2002. The Wind of the Hundred Days: How Washington Mismanaged Globalization. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Bird, Graham. 1996. The International Monetary Fund and Developing Countries: A Review of the Evidence and Policy Options. International Organization 50 (3):477511.Google Scholar
Bordo, Michael D., and Harold James. 2000. The International Monetary Fund: Its Present Role in Historical Perspective. NBER Working Paper 7724. Cambridge, Mass.: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Boughton, James M. 2001. Silent Revolution: The International Monetary Fund, 1979–1989. Washington, D.C.: International Monetary Fund.
Broz, J. Lawrence. 1998. The Origins of Central Banking: Solutions to the Free-Rider Problem. International Organization 52 (2):23168.Google Scholar
Broz, J. Lawrence. 1999. Origins of the Federal Reserve System: International Incentives and the Domestic Free-Rider Problem. International Organization 53 (1):3970.Google Scholar
Broz, J. Lawrence. 2005. Congressional Politics of International Financial Rescues. American Journal of Political Science 49 (3):47996.Google Scholar
Bulow, Jeremy, and Kenneth Rogoff. 1990. Cleaning Up Third-World Debt Without Getting Taken to the Cleaners. Journal of Economic Perspectives 4 (1):3142.Google Scholar
Calomiris, Charles W. 1998. The IMF's Imprudent Role as Lender of Last Resort. Cato Journal 17 (3):27594.Google Scholar
Caprio, Gerard, and Daniela Klingebiel. 2003. Episodes of Systemic and Borderline Financial Crises. Unpublished manuscript, World Bank, Washington, D.C. Data set available at,,contentMDK:20699588∼pagePK:64214825∼piPK:64214943∼theSitePK:469382,00.html〉. Accessed 23 December 2006.
Cornes, Richard, and Todd Sandler. 1984. Easy Riders, Joint Production, and Public Goods. Economic Journal 94 (3):58098.Google Scholar
Cooper, Richard N., Joseph L.S. Abbey, Montek Singh Ahluwalia, Muhammad S. Al-Jasser, Horst Siebert, György Suranyi, Makoto Utsumi, and Roberto Zahler. 2000. Report to the IMF Executive Board of the Quota Formula Review Group, September. Washington, D.C.: International Monetary Fund.
Dell'Ariccia, Giovanni, Isabel Schnabel, and Jeromin Zettelmeyer. 2002. Moral Hazard and International Crisis Lending: A Test. IMF Working Paper 181. Washington, D.C.: International Monetary Fund.
Demirguc-Kunt, Asli, and Harry Huizinga. 1993. Official Credits to Developing Countries: Implicit Transfers to the Banks. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 25 (3):43044.Google Scholar
Denzau, Arthur, and Michael Munger. 1986. Legislators and Interest Groups: How Unorganized Interests Get Represented. American Political Science Review 80 (1):89106.Google Scholar
Dreher, Axel, and Nathan Jensen. 2003. Independent Actor or Agent? An Empirical Analysis of the Impact of US Interests on IMF Conditions. Leitner Working Paper 2003–04, Leitner Program in International Political Economy, Yale University, Hartford, Conn.
Dreher, Axel, and Roland Vaubel. 2004. Do IMF and IBRD Cause Moral Hazard and Political Business Cycles? Evidence from Panel Data. Open Economies Review 15 (1):522.Google Scholar
Ferroni, Marco, and Ashoka Mody, eds. 2002. International Public Goods: Incentives, Measurement, and Financing. Dordecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.
Frankel, Jeffrey, and Nouriel Roubini. 2001. The Role of Industrial Country Policies in Emerging Market Crises. NBER Working Paper 8634, Cambridge, Mass.: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Gertzke, Erik, and Dong-Joon Jo. 2002. The Affinity of Nations Index, 1946–1996, Version 3.0. Available at 〈∼eg589/datasets.htm〉. Accessed 23 December 2006.
Gould, Erica R. 2003. Money Talks: Supplementary Financiers and International Monetary Fund Conditionality. International Organization 57 (3):55186.Google Scholar
Grier, Kevin B., and Michael C. Munger. 1991. Committee Assignments, Constituent Preferences, and Campaign Contributions. Economic Inquiry 29 (1):2443.Google Scholar
Hall, Richard L., and Frank W. Wayman. 1990. Buying Time: Moneyed Interests and the Mobilization of Bias in Congressional Committees. American Political Science Review 84 (3):797820.Google Scholar
Haskel, Jonathan E., and Matthew J. Slaughter. 2000. Have Falling Tariffs and Transportation Costs Raised U.S. Wage Inequality? NBER Working Paper 7539. Cambridge, Mass.: National Bureau of Economic Research.
International Monetary Fund (IMF). Various years. IMF Annual Report. Washington, D.C.: IMF.
International Monetary Fund (IMF). Various years. International Financial Statistics. Washington, D.C.: IMF.
Jacobson, Gary C. 2000. Party Polarization in National Politics: The Electoral Connection. In Polarized Politics: Congress and the President in a Partisan Era, edited by Jon R. Bond and Richard Fleisher, 930. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly Press.
Jeanne, Olivier, and Jeromin Zettelmeyer. 2001. International Bailouts, Moral Hazard, and Conditionality. Economic Policy 16 (33):40932.Google Scholar
Kahler, Miles. 1990. The United States and the International Monetary Fund. In The United States and Multilateral Institutions, edited by Margaret P. Karns and Karen A. Mingst, 91114. Boston: Unwin Hyman.
Kaminsky, Graciela, Saul Lizondo, and Carmen Reinhart. 1998. Leading Indicators of Currency Crises. IMF Staff Papers 45 (1):148.Google Scholar
Kaul, Inge, Pedro Conceicao, Katell Le Goulven, and Ronald U. Mendoza, eds. 2003. Providing Global Public Goods; Managing Globalization. New York: Oxford University Press.
Kindleberger, Charles P. 1986. Rev. ed. The World in Depression, 1929–1939. Berkeley: University of California Press.
King, Gary, Michael Tomz, and Jason Wittenberg. 2000. Making the Most of Statistical Analyses: Improving Interpretation and Presentation. American Journal of Political Science 44 (2):34155.Google Scholar
Kroszner, Randall S., and Thomas Stratmann. 1998. Interest-Group Competition and the Organization of Congress: Theory and Evidence from Financial Services' Political Action Committees. American Economic Review 88 (5):116387.Google Scholar
Lipscy, Phillip. 2003. The Political Economy of International Bailout Lending: Joint Products and Distributive Conflict. Unpublished manuscript, Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass.
Locke, Mary. 2000. Funding the IMF: The Debate in the U.S. Congress. Finance and Development 37 (3):67.Google Scholar
Makinson, Larry. 2003. Open Secrets: The Encyclopedia of Congressional Money and Politics. Available at 〈〉. Accessed 23 January 2006.
Mayda, Anna Maria, and Dani Rodrik. 2005. Why Are Some People (and Countries) More Protectionist than Others? European Economic Review 49 (6):1393430.Google Scholar
Meltzer, Allan H. 1998. Asian Problems and the IMF. Cato Journal 17 (3):26774.Google Scholar
Mundell, Robert A. 1957. International Trade and Factor Mobility. American Economic Review 47 (3):32135.Google Scholar
Oatley, Thomas. 2002. Commercial Banks and the International Monetary Fund: An Empirical Analysis. Unpublished manuscript. University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
Oatley, Thomas, and Jason Yackee. 2004. American Interests and IMF Lending. International Politics 41 (3):41529.Google Scholar
O'Rourke, Kevin, 2003. Heckscher-Ohlin Theory and Individual Attitudes towards Globalization. NBER Working Paper 9872. Cambridge, Mass.: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Pauly, Louis W. 1997. Who Elected the Bankers? Surveillance and Control in the World Economy. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
Poole, Keith T., and Howard Rosenthal. 1997. Congress: A Political-Economic History of Roll Call Voting. New York: Oxford University Press.
Przeworski, Adam, and James R. Vreeland. 2000. The Effect of IMF Programs on Economic Growth. Journal of Development Economics 62 (2):385421.Google Scholar
Rogoff, Kenneth. 1999. International Institutions for Reducing Global Financial Instability. Journal of Economic Perspectives 13 (4):2142.Google Scholar
Sandler, Todd. 2002. On Financing Global and International Public Goods. In International Public Goods: Incentives, Measurement, and Financing, edited by Marco Ferroni and Ashoka Mody, 183192. Dordecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.
Scheve, Kenneth F., and Matthew J. Slaughter. 2001. What Determines Individual Trade-Policy Preferences? Journal of International Economics 54 (2):26792.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Anna J. 1998. Time to Terminate the ESF and IMF. Cato Foreign Policy Briefing 48. Washington, D.C.: Cato Institute.
Shepsle, Kenneth A. 1978. The Giant Jigsaw Puzzle: Democratic Committee Assignments in the Modern House. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Soros, George. 1998. The Crisis of Global Capitalism: Open Society Endangered. New York: Public Affairs.
Snyder, James. 1992. Long-Term Investment in Politicians; or, Give Early, Give Often. Journal of Law and Economics 35 (1):1543.Google Scholar
Stiglitz, Joseph. 2002. Globalization and Its Discontents. New York: W.W. Norton.
Stolper, Wolfgang, and Paul A. Samuelson. 1941. Protection and Real Wages. Review of Economic Studies 9 (1):5873.Google Scholar
Stone, Randall W. 2004. The Political Economy of IMF Lending in Africa. American Political Science Review 98 (4):57791.Google Scholar
Stratmann, Thomas. 2002. Can Special Interests Buy Congressional Votes? Evidence from Financial Services Legislation. Journal of Law and Economics 45 (2):34573.Google Scholar
Thacker, Strom. 1999. The High Politics of IMF Lending. World Politics 52 (1):3875.Google Scholar
Tomz, Michael, Jason Wittenberg, and Gary King. 1998. CLARIFY: Software for Interpreting and Presenting Statistical Results. Version 1.2. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University.
U.S. Bureau of the Census. Congressional Districts of the United States. CD-ROM, Summary Tape Files 1D and 3D. Washington, D.C.: Bureau of the Census.
U.S. Bureau of the Census 1997. County Business Patterns 1997. CD-ROM. Washington, D.C.: Bureau of the Census.
U.S. Chamber of Commerce. 1998. How They Voted. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Chamber of Commerce.
U.S. Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council (FFIEC). Various years. Statistical Release E.16, Country Exposure Lending Survey and Country Exposure Information Report. Washington, D.C.: FFIEC.
Vreeland, James R. 2003. Why Do Governments and the IMF Enter into Agreements? International Political Science Review 24 (3):32143.Google Scholar
Wood, Adrian. 1994. North-South Trade, Employment, and Inequality: Changing Fortunes in a Skill-Driven World. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Woods, Ngaire. 2003. The United States and the International Financial Institutions: Power and Influence within the World Bank and the IMF. In U.S. Hegemony and International Organizations—the United States and Multilateral Institutions, edited by Rosemary Foot, S. Neil MacFarlane, and Michael Mastanduno, 92115. London: Oxford University Press.
World Bank. Various years. World Development Indicators. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.
Wright, John R. 1996. Interest Groups and Congress. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Wyplosz, Charles. 1999. International Financial Instability. In Global Public Goods: International Cooperation in the 21st Century, edited by Inge Kaul, Isabelle Grunberg, and Marc Stern, 15289. New York: Oxford University Press.
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Congressional Politics of Financing the International Monetary Fund
Available formats

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Congressional Politics of Financing the International Monetary Fund
Available formats

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Congressional Politics of Financing the International Monetary Fund
Available formats

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *