Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T20:36:00.108Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Brzak v. United Nations (2D Cir.) and Mothers of Srebrenica v. Netherlands& United Nations (Neth. App. Ct.)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2017

Larry D. Johnson
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
International Legal Documents
Information
International Legal Materials , Volume 49 , Issue 4 , August 2010 , pp. 1011 - 1028
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

End notes

* This text was reproduced and reformatted from the text available at the United States Court of Appeals website (visited June 1, 2010) http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isquery/39126c99-76b0-4d04-be4f-4dce7a4d5f83/1/doc/08-2799-cv_opn.pdf#xml=http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isquery/39126c99-76b0-4d04-be4f-4dce7a4d5f83/1/hilite/.

† The Clerk of Court is directed to amend the official caption to conform to the listing of the parties stated above.

1 Convention on Privileges and Immunities of the United Nations, Feb.13, 1946, 21 U.S.T. 1418.

2 Brzak v. United Nations, 597 F.3d 107 (2d Cir. 2010).

3 Brzak v. United Nations, 551 F. Supp. 2d 313 (S.D.N.Y.2008).

4 Civil Rights Act of 1964 tit. VII, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000–2000e-17.

5 Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, 18 U.S.C.§§ 1961-1968.

6 Medellín v. Texas, 552 U.S. 491 (2008).

7 International Organizations Act of 1945, 22 U.S.C. §§ 288a(b).

8 Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 1602-1611.

9 Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, 23 U.S.T. 3227 (1972).

10 See Brzak, 551 F. Supp. 2d 313.

11 The circuit court noted that it reviews de novo a district court’s dismissal of a claim for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction, as well as legal conclusions which grant or deny immunity. Brzak, 597 F.3d 107.

12 See Docket No. 09-1481, http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/09-1481.htm

13 Mothers of Srebrenica v. Netherlands&United Nations, Case No. 200.20.151/01, Judgment (Appeal Ct. Hague Mar. 30, 2010), available at http://www.haguejusticeportal.net/Docs/Dutch%20cases/Appeals_Judgment_Mothers_Srebrenica_EN.pdf (the English text is an unofficial translation, provided by the court, of the official judgment in the Dutch language. Only the judgment in the Dutch language is binding).

14 Convention on Prevention and Punishment of Crime of Genocide art. 1, Dec. 9, 1948, 78 U.N.T.S. 277.

15 European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms art. 6, Nov. 4, 1950,213U.N.T.S. 222.

16 International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights art. 14, opened for signature Dec. 19, 1966, 999 U.N.T.S. 171.

17 The English translation refers on several occasions to “immunity from prosecution “ in this case. It presumably refers to immunity from “civil prosecution “ or from “legal process “ rather than criminal prosecution, which is not in play here.

18 Model Status of Forces Agreement, U.N. Doc. A/45/594, ¶ 51 (Oct. 9, 1990).

19 G.A. Res. 52/247, U.N. Doc. A/RES/52/247 (June 26, 1998).

20 U.N. Secretary-General, Administrative and Budgetary Aspects of the Financing of United Nations Peacekeeping Operations: Rep. of the Secretary-General, U.N. Doc. A/51/389 (Sept. 20, 1996); U.N. Doc. A/51/903 (May 21, 1997).

21 U.N. Doc. A/51/389, supra note 19,q 14.

22 U.N. Doc. A/51/903, supra note 19,q 14.