Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-544b6db54f-5rlvm Total loading time: 0.123 Render date: 2021-10-19T06:56:19.687Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

The State of the Netherlands v. Urgenda (Neth. Sup. Ct.)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 August 2020

André Nollkaemper
Affiliation:
André Nollkaemper is Professor of Public International Law and the Dean of the Faculty of Law at the University of Amsterdam. Laura Burgers this year defends her Ph.D. thesis on climate change litigation at the same law school. For further fuller analysis of the judgment and broader discussion of the above points, see André Nollkaemper and Laura Burgers, A New Classic in Climate Change Litigation: The Dutch Supreme Court Decision in the Urgenda Case, EJIL: Talk! (January 6, 2020), https://www.ejiltalk.org/a-new-classic-in-climate-change-litigation-the-dutch-supreme-court-decision-in-the-urgenda-case.
Laura Burgers
Affiliation:
André Nollkaemper is Professor of Public International Law and the Dean of the Faculty of Law at the University of Amsterdam. Laura Burgers this year defends her Ph.D. thesis on climate change litigation at the same law school. For further fuller analysis of the judgment and broader discussion of the above points, see André Nollkaemper and Laura Burgers, A New Classic in Climate Change Litigation: The Dutch Supreme Court Decision in the Urgenda Case, EJIL: Talk! (January 6, 2020), https://www.ejiltalk.org/a-new-classic-in-climate-change-litigation-the-dutch-supreme-court-decision-in-the-urgenda-case.

Extract

On December 20, 2019, the Supreme Court of the Netherlands published its judgment in The State of the Netherlands v. Urgenda. The judgment is largely a discussion of questions of Dutch law, but contains several conclusions that are relevant from an international law perspective. In particular, the Court held that on the basis of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), the Netherlands has a positive obligation to take measures for the prevention of climate change and that it was required to reduce its greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by at least 25 percent by the end of 2020, compared with 1990 levels.

Type
International Legal Documents
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Climate Change 2007: Mitigation. (Bert Metz et al. eds., 2007).

2 Rb Den Haag (Court of First Instance, The Hague) June 24, 2015, ECLI:NL:RBDHA:2015:7145 Urgenda t Staat der Nederlanden (Neth.).

3 Hof Den Haag (Court of Appeal, The Hague) Oct. 9, 2018, ECLI:NL:GHDHA:2018:2591 Staat der Nederlanden t Urgenda (Neth.).

4 HR Procureur-generaal en advocaat-generaal bij (Procurator-General and Advocate General, Supreme Court of the Netherlands) Sept. 13, 2019, ECLI:NL:PHR:2019:887 Urgenda t staat der Nederlanden (Neth.).

5 HR Nederlanden (Supreme Court of the Netherlands) Dec. 20, 2019, ECLI:NL:2019:2006, Urgenda t Staat der Nederlanden (Neth.).

6 Translated, the first paragraph of this provision reads: “A foundation or association with full legal capacity that, according to its articles of association, has the objection to protect specific interests, may bring to court a legal claim that intents to protect similar interests of other persons.”

7 Cf. e.g., Report of the Independent Expert on the Issue of Human Rights Obligations Relating to the Enjoyment of a Safe, Clean, Healthy and Sustainable Environment, John H. Knox, UN Document A/HRC/25/53, 30 December 2015, available at https://undocs.org/A/HRC/25/53 (last visited 9 April, 2020).

8 The Environment and Human Rights (State Obligations in Relation to the Environment in the Context of the Protection and Guarantee of the Rights to Life and to Personal Integrity: Interpretation and Scope of Articles 4(1) and 5(1) in relation to Articles 1(1) and 2 of the American Convention on Human Rights), Advisory Opinion OC-23/17, Inter-Am. Ct. H.R. (Nov. 15, 2017).

9 See, e.g., Ashgar Leghari v. Pakistan, (2015) W.P. No. 25501/2015 (Pak.).

10 A useful oversight of relevant literature is provided on the website of the Global Network for the Study of Human Rights and the Environment (GNHRE), https://gnhre.org/research-repository/climate-change.

11 Demir and Baykara v. Turkey, App. No. 34503/97, Eur. Ct. H.R. (2008).

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

The State of the Netherlands v. Urgenda (Neth. Sup. Ct.)
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

The State of the Netherlands v. Urgenda (Neth. Sup. Ct.)
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

The State of the Netherlands v. Urgenda (Neth. Sup. Ct.)
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *