Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-thh2z Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-31T02:36:41.306Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

De Jong, Baljet and Van Den Brink Case

European Court of Human Rights.  22 May 1984 .

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Get access

Abstract

Human rights — Arrest and detention — Freedom from — Permissible restrictions — Arrest and detention on remand of conscript servicemen — Offences contrary to military code — Validity — European Convention on Human Rights, 1950, Article 5(1) — Right to be brought before officer authorized by law to exercise judicial power — Article 5(3) — Authority with advisory power — Auditeur-militair — Internal practice of following his advice — Whether sufficient — Independence — Right to speedy determination of legality of detention — Article 5(4) — Whether period of entitlement to run concurrently with period in Article 5(3) — Delays under military procedure — Whether a deprivation of access to speedy determination — Discrimination — Whether justifiable — Article 14 in conjunction with Article 5

International tribunals — Jurisdiction — Preliminary objections — Non-exhaustion of domestic remedies — Article 26 — Stage in proceedings at which objection to be raised — Estoppel — Effectiveness and accessibility of domestic remedies — Burden of proof — Whether applicants qualify as “victims” — Whether proof of detriment required — Article 25 — European Commission and Court of Human Rights

Damages — Human rights violations — European Convention on Human Rights, 1950, Article 50 — Non-pecuniary loss

Type
Case Report
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)