Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-55597f9d44-dfw9g Total loading time: 0.359 Render date: 2022-08-07T16:46:45.207Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true
  • English
International Journal of Tropical Insect Science International Journal of Tropical Insect Science

Article contents

Influence of light components on the life attributes of an aphidophagous ladybird Propylea dissecta (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 August 2019

G. Mishra  and
Omkar
G. Mishra
Affiliation:
Ladybird Research Laboratory, Department of Zoology University of Lucknow, Lucknow 226 007, India
Omkar*
Affiliation:
Ladybird Research Laboratory, Department of Zoology University of Lucknow, Lucknow 226 007, India
*
*Email: omkaar55@hotmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions[Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The influence of two photoperiods (14L:10D and 24L:0D) and four wavelengths of light [white (control), blue (c. 475 ran), yellow (c. 570 nm) and red (c. 650nm)] on development and reproduction of the ladybird, Propylea dissecta (Mulsant), was investigated. The photoperiod of 14L:10D and the white-light wavelength recorded fastest development, maximum survival and reproduction. The developmental and reproductive Performance decreased in the order white > yellow > blue > red. The effect of the wavelength is probably due to the differential predatory response under different coloured arenas.

Résumé

Résumé

L'influence de deux photopériodes (14 h de lumière:10h d'obscurité et 24 h d'obscurité) et de quatre types de lumière: blanc (témoin), bleu (±475nm), jaune (±570nm) et rouge (±650nm) sur le développement et la reproduction de la coccinelle Propylea dissecta (Mulsant) a été étudiée. La photopériode de 14 h de lumière:10h d'obscurité et la lumière blanche ont permis un meilleur développement, des taux maxima de survie et de reproduction. Les performances de survie et de reproduction induites par la lumière diminuent dans l'ordre suivant blanc > jaune > bleu > rouge. L'effet de la longueur d'onde lumineuse résulte probablement de différences du comportement de prédation induites par les différentes couleurs.

Keywords

Propylea dissectaladybirdphotoperiodwavelengthdevelopmentsurvivalreproductionPropylea dissectacoccinellephotopériodelongueur d'ondesparamètres biologiques
Type
Research Article
Information
International Journal of Tropical Insect Science , Volume 25 , Issue 1 , March 2005 , pp. 32 - 38
Copyright
Copyright © ICIPE 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aarseth, K. A. and Schräm, T. A. (1999) Wavelength specific behaviour in Lepeophtheirus salmonis and Calanus finmarchkus (Crustacea: Copepoda) to ultraviolet and visiblc light in laboratory experiments. Marine Ecology 186, 211–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ceryngier, P., Kindlmann, R., Havelka, J., Dostalkova, I., Brunhofer, V. and Hodek, I. (1992) Effect of food parasitisation photoperiod and tcmperature on gonads and sexual activities of males of Coccinella septempunctata (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) in autumn. Acta Entomologia Bohemoslovaca 89, 97–106.Google Scholar
Chocorosqui, V. R. and Panizzi, A. R. (2003) Photoperiod influence on the biology and phenological characteristics of Dichelops melacanthus (Dallas 1851) (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae). Brazilian Journal of Biology, 63, 655–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danks, H. V. (1987) Insect dormancy: an ecological perspective. In Biological Survey of Canada (terrestrial arthropods). National Museum of Natural Sciences, Ottawa. 439 pp.Google Scholar
Dimetry, N. Z. (1988) Orientation to light by the ladybird beetle, pp. 135–140. In Ecology and Effcctiveness of Aphidophaga (Edited by Niemcyzk E. and Dixon A. F. G). SPB Acad. Publ., The Hague.Google Scholar
Dixon, A. F. G. (2000) Ladybird beetles and biological control. In Insect Predator-Prey Dynamics. Cambridge University Press, 257 pp.Google Scholar
Edery, I. (2000) Circadian rhythms in a nutshell. Physiological Genomics 3, 59–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferran, A. and Larroque, M. M. (1977) Etüde des relations höte-predateur: La consommation et l’utilisation d’un puceron Myzus persicae Sulz, par les différents stades larvaires de la coccinelle Semiadalia undecimnotnta Sehn. (Col. Coccinellidae). Annales de Zoologie et Ecologie Animalc 9, 665–691.Google Scholar
Giebultowicz, J. M. (1999) Insect circadian clocks: is it all in their head? Journal of Insect Physiology 45, 791–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harmon, J., Losey, J. E. and Ives, A. R. (1998) The roleof vision and colour in the close proximity foraging behaviour of four coccinellid species. Occologia 115, 287–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodek, I. and Honek, A. (1996) Ecology of Coccinellidae. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht Boston London. 464 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodek, I. and Ruzicka, Z. (1979) Photoperiodic response in relation to diapause in Coccinella septempunctata (Coleoptera). Acta Entomologia Bohemoslovaca 76, 209–218.Google Scholar
Ishida, H., Murai, T., Sonoda, S., Yoshida, H., Izumi, Y. and Tsumuki, H. (2003) Effects of temperature and photoperiod on development and oviposition of Frankliniella occidentalis (Pergande) (Thysanoptera: Thripidae). Applied Entomology and Zoology 38, 65–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurahashi, H. and Shudo, C. (2003) Photoperiodically induced delayed oogenesis in the blow fly Aldrkhina grahami (Diptera: Calliphoridae). Medical Entomology and Zoology 54, 275–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macedo, L. P. M., Souza, B., Carvalho, C. F. and Ecole, C. C. (2003) Influence of the photoperiod on development and reproduetion of Chrysoperla externa (Hagen) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Neotropical Entomology 32, 91–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miklosi, A., Gonda, Z., Osorio, D. and Farzin, A. (2002) The effects of the visual environment on responses to colour by domestic chicks. Journal of Comparative Physiology A. Sensory, Neural and Behavioural Physiology 188, 135–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mills, N. J. (1982) Voracity cannibalism and coccinellid predation. Annals of Applied Biology 101, 144–148.Google Scholar
Nakamura, K. (2003) Effect of photoperiod on development and growth in a pentatomid bug Dolycoris baccanim. Entomological Science 6, 11–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakamura, K. and Numata, H. (2000) Photoperiodic control of the intensity of diapause and diapause development in the bean bug Riplortus clavatus (Heteroptera: Alydidae). European Journal of Entomology 97, 19–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niijima, K. and Kawashita, T. (1982) Studies on the ovarian development in Coccinella septempunctata bruckii Mulsant. Bulletin ofthe Faculty of Agriculture, Tamagawa University 22, 7–13.Google Scholar
Niva, C. C. and Takeda, M. (2003) Effects of photoperiod temperature and melatonin on nymphal development, polyphenism and reproduetion in Halyomorpha halys (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae). Zoological Science 20, 963–970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Omkar, and Pervez, A. (2000) Sexual dimorphism in Propylea dissecta (Mulsant) (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Journal of Aphidology 14, 139–140.Google Scholar
Omkar, Mishra G. and Singh, K. (2004a) Effect of different wavelengths of light on the life attributes of two aphidophagous ladybirds. European Journal of Entomology (in press).Google Scholar
Phillips, C. J. C. and Lomas, C. A. (2001) The pereeption of color by cattle and its influence on behavior. Journal of Dairy Science 84, 807–813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plautz, J. D., Kaneko, M., Hall, J. C. and Kay, S. A. (1997) Independent photoreeeptive circadian clocks throughout Drosophila. Science 278, 1632–1635.Google Scholar
Prayitno, D. S., Phillips, C. J. C. and Stokes, D. K. (1997) The effects of color and intensity of light on behavior and leg disorders in broiler chickens. Poultry Science 76, 1674–1681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shpigel, M., McBride, S. C., Marciano, S. and Lupatsch, I. (2004) The effect of photoperiod and temperature on the reproduetion of European sea urchin Paracentrotus lividus. Aquaculture 232, 343–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silveira, L. C. P. and Bueno, V. H. P. (2003) Orius insidiosus (Say, 1832) (Heteroptera: Anthocoridae): Sensitivity to diapause-inducting photoperiods? Revista Brasileira de Entomologia 47, 631–635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taniguchi, N. and Tomioka, K. (2003) Duration of development and number of nymphal instars are differentially regulated by photoperiod in the cricket Modicogryllus siamensis (Orthoptera: Gryllidae). European Journal of Entomology 100, 275–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tauber, M. J., Tauber, C. A. and Masaki, S. (1986) Seasonal Adaptation of Insects. Oxford University Press, Oxford. 411 pp.Google Scholar
Tokumaru, S. and Abe, Y. (2003) Effects of temperature and photoperiod on development and reproduetive potential of Liriomyza sativae, L. trifolii and L. bryoniae (Diptera: Agromyzidae). Japanese Journal of Applied Entomology and Zoology 47, 143–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torres, J., Hermoso, de Mendoza A. and Jacas, J. (2002) Influence of temperature and photoperiod on development of Asymmetrasca decedens (Paoli) (Homoptera: Cicadellidae). Boletin de Sanidad Vegetal, Piagas 28, 263–272.Google Scholar
Urbaneja, A., Llácer, E., Garrido, A. and Jacas, J. A. (2001) Effect of variable photoperiod on development and survival of Cirrospilus sp. nr. Lynchus (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) an ectoparasitoid of Phyllocnistis citrella (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae). Florida Entomologist 84, 305–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Influence of light components on the life attributes of an aphidophagous ladybird Propylea dissecta (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae)
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Influence of light components on the life attributes of an aphidophagous ladybird Propylea dissecta (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae)
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Influence of light components on the life attributes of an aphidophagous ladybird Propylea dissecta (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae)
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *