Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-l82ql Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-26T15:16:29.574Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Impact of the Technological Care Environment on the Nursing Role

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2009

Dianne Pelletier ,
Christine Duffield ,
Anne Adams ,
Jackie Crisp ,
Sue Nagy  and
Jillian Murphy
Dianne Pelletier
Affiliation:
University of Technology, Sydney
Christine Duffield
Affiliation:
University of Technology, Sydney
Anne Adams
Affiliation:
University of Technology, Sydney
Jackie Crisp
Affiliation:
University of Technology, Sydney
Sue Nagy
Affiliation:
University of Technology, Sydney
Jillian Murphy
Affiliation:
University of Technology, Sydney
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Proliferation of acute health care technology creates problems and benefits for nurses and patients. In this paper the impact of technology on the nursing work role is reviewed through the international literature. The thrust of the nursing literature has, not surprisingly, matured over time as the use of technology has become well established in the acute care environment, and three themes can be identified. The implications for acute care nurse specialists, including their educational needs, are set in context of the Australian health care system, with particular reference to the cardiac care environments.

Type
General Essays
Information
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care , Volume 12 , Issue 2 , Spring 1996 , pp. 358 - 366
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Arkosar, M. A.What happens to patient autonomy in high tech care? The American Nurse, 1987, 4, 15.Google Scholar
2.Ashworth, P.High technology and humanity for intensive care. Intensive Care Nursing, 1990, 6, 150–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Badger, J. M., & Knott, J. E.Death of a support group member: A practical guide to helping other members cope. Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 1993, 7, 63–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Ballard, K.Showing where the money goes: Cost effective care in ICU. Professional Nurse, 1990, 5, 656–58.Google ScholarPubMed
5.Banta, D., & Andreasen, P. B.The political dimension in health care technology assessment programs. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 1990, 6, 115–232.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Barclay, L., Creegan, R., Duffield, C., et al. Collaborative graduate education: Models for the future. Paper presented at Today's Education Formula: Tomorrow's Nursing Practice, 5th National Nursing Education Conference, 10 6–9, 1992, University of Sydney, Sydney.Google Scholar
7.Beattie, S., & Menhardt, S.Transesophageal echocardiography: Advanced technology for the cardiac patient. Critical Care Nurse, 1992, 12 (8); 42–44, 46–48.Google Scholar
8.Benner, P.From novice to expert: Excellence and power in clinical nursing practice. Menlo Park, CA: Addison Wesley Publishers, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Benner, P. Performance expectations of new graduates. Paper presented at the AACCN Invitational Conference on Critical Care Nursing at the Baccalaureate Level: Strategies for the Future, 03, 1989, San Antonio, Texas.Google Scholar
10.Benner, P., & Tanner, C.How expert nurses use intuition. American Journal of Nursing, 1988, 87, 23–31.Google Scholar
11.Benner, P., Tanner, C., & Chesla, C.From beginner to expert: Gaining a differentiated clinical world in critical care nursing. Advances in Nursing Science, 1992, 14, 13–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12.Bland Jones, C., & Alexander, J.The technology of caring: A synthesis of technology and caring for nursing administration. Nursing Administration Quarterly, 1993, 17, 11–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Brewer, A.Nurses, nursing and new technology: Implications of a dynamic technological environment. Sydney: Australian Studies in Health Service Administration, 1983, No. 47.Google Scholar
14.Brewer, A. Technology and the health workforce. Paper presented at the Australian Hospitals Association Congress, 10, 1990, Canberra.Google Scholar
15.Brunt, J. H.An exploration of the relationship between nurses' empathy and technology. Nursing Administration Quarterly, 1985, 9, 69–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16.Campbell, M., McConnell, E. A., Walleck, C., et al. The key issues in device use as they relate to nursing practice. Panel discussion at the Nursing and Technology: Moving into the 21st Century Conference Proceedings, 1988, Annapolis, MD.Google Scholar
17.Closhesy, J. M. Closed loop medication delivery systems. In Clochesy, J. M., (ed.), Advanced technology in critical care nursing. Rockville, MD: Aspen Publishers, 1989,157–59.Google Scholar
18.Cohn, L. H.The paradox of high tech health care: Has our technology outstripped our ability to be ethical, cost effective and timely in its delivery? Chest, 1988, 93, 864–67.Google Scholar
19.Cooper, D. K., Valladares, B. K., & Futterman, L. G.Care of the patient with the automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillator: A guide for nurses, Heart & Lung, 1987, 16, 640–48.Google ScholarPubMed
20.Cooper, M.The intersection of technology and care in the ICU. Advances in Nursing Science, 1993, 15, 23–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21.Corley, M., Selig, P., & Ferguson, C.Ethics. Critical Care Nurse, 1993, 13, 120–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22.Creegan, R., Schmied, V., Duffield, C., et al. Collaborative graduate education: Models for the future. Paper presented at Today's Education Formula: Tomorrow's Nursing Practice: 5th National Nursing Education Conference. 1992, Sydney.Google Scholar
23.Cruise, M. J., & Gorenberg, B. D.The tools of management: Keeping high touch in a high tech world. International Nursing Review, 1985, 32, 166–69, 173.Google Scholar
24.Cullen, D. J.Reassessing critical care: Illness, outcome, and cost. Critical Care Medicine, 1989, 17, S172–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25.Currier, D., & Packa, D.The patient with an implantable cardiac defibrillator: A case study. Focus on Critical Care, 1992, 19, 150–54.Google ScholarPubMed
26.Emmett, A.Health care trends that will reshape nursing. Nursing 94, 1994, 24 (4), 50–53.Google ScholarPubMed
27.Fabiszewski, R., & Volosin, K. J.Refusal of implantable cardioverter defibrillator: The nurse's role. Focus on Critical Care, 1992, 19, 97–100.Google Scholar
28.Farmer, E.The impact of technology on nursing. Nursing Mirror, 1978, 147, 17–20.Google ScholarPubMed
29.Ferguson, L.Specialist nurse education in Australia. Australian Critical Care, 1994, 7, 15.Google Scholar
30.Fralic, M. F.Nursing's precious resource: The clinical nurse specialist. Journal of Nursing Administration, 1988, 18, 5–6.Google ScholarPubMed
31.Franck, L.Nurses and technology: Masters of the universe or lost in space? Paper presented at the International Paediatric Nursing Conference: Towards a Better Future, Sydney, 06 2–5, 1992.Google Scholar
32.Fricchione, G. L., Olsen, L., & Vlay, S. C.Psychiatric syndromes in patients with the automatic internal cardioverter defibrillator: Anxiety, psychological dependence, abuse and withdrawal. American Heart Journal, 1989, 117, 1411–14.Google Scholar
33.Gerity, P.Perception in nursing–The value of intuition. Holistic Nursing Practice, 1987, 1, 63–71.Google Scholar
34.Golonka, L.Trends in health care and use of technology by nurses. Medical Instrumentation, 1986, 20, 8–10.Google ScholarPubMed
35.Gordon, S.The importance of being nurses. Technology Review, 1992, 10, 42–46, 49–51.Google Scholar
36.Halm, M., & Alpern, M.The impact of technology on patients and families. Nursing Clinics of North America, 1993, 28, 443–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
37.Harper, P., & Vanriper, S.Implantable cardioverter defibrillator: A patient education model for the illiterate patient. Critical Care Nurse, 1993, 13, 55–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
38.Harrington, D.Technology and Health Care. Paper presented at the Patient Care Technology Group Conference, 07 26, 1991, Penrith, New South Wales, Australia.Google Scholar
39.Hawthorne, D. L., & Yurkovich, N. J.Science technology caring and the professions: Are they compatible? Journal of Advanced Nursing, 1995, 21, 1087–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
40.Henderson, V.Preserving the essence of nursing in a technological age. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 1980, 5, 245–60.Google Scholar
41.Hesterly, S.Nurse credentialling in an acute care setting. Journal of Nursing Quality Assurance, 1991, 5, 18–26.Google Scholar
42.Hickson, P.Technology in nursing: A feminist critique. Paper presented at Nursing Research: Scholarship for Practice Conference, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, 07 1–2, 1992.Google Scholar
43.Howie, S., & Vanriper, S.Redesigning work: The cardiac intervention nurse liaison. Nursing Management, 1992, 23, 64J.Google Scholar
44.Hudson, G. R.Empathy and caring in the coronary care unit. Intensive Care Nursing, 1993, 9, 55–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
45.Hughes, S. Bedside information systems: State of the art. In Ball, M. J., Hannah, K. J., Gerdin, J., & Patterson, H., eds., Nursing informatics where caring and technology meet. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1988, 138–45.Google Scholar
46.Jablonski, R. S.The experience of being mechanically ventilated. Qualitative Health Research, 1994, 4, 186–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
47.Jacox, A.Addressing variations in nursing practice/technology through clinical practice guidelines methods. Nursing Economics, 1993, 11, 170–73.Google ScholarPubMed
48.Jacox, A., & Kerfoot, K.Technology assessment in hospitals. Nursing Economics, 1990, 8, 276–79.Google Scholar
49.Lindemen, C.Nursing and technology: Moving into the 21st century. Caring Magazine, 1992, 11 (9), 5–10.Google Scholar
50.Malila, F. M.Caring in a technological age: Education for adaptation. Focus on Critical Care, 1987, 14, 21–26.Google Scholar
51.Mann, R.Preserving humanity in an age of technology. Intensive and Critical Care, 1991, 8, 54–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
52.Mark, B., & Hagenmueller, A.Technological and environmental characteristics of intensive care units: Implications for job design. Journal of Nursing Administration. 1994, 24, 65–71.Google Scholar
53.Maries, F. (chair). Report of the study of professional issues in nursing. Melbourne: Victorian Government Printer, 1988.Google Scholar
54.Marsden, C.An ethical assessment of intensive care. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 1992, 8, 408–18.Google Scholar
55.Massaro, T.Impact of new technologies on health care-costs and on the nation's ‘health.’ Clinical Chemistry, 1990, 36, 1612–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
56.McConnell, E.Technology assessment: The road to appropriate equipment and care. Nursing Management, 1992, 23 (6), 64a-b, 64f, 64h.Google Scholar
57.McConnell, E.Technology-orientated patient care. Nursingworld Journal, 1989, 15, 1–3.Google Scholar
58.McConnell, E., Newland, H., Manning, J., & Paech, M.Technology assessment applied: A comparison of ophthalmic diagnostic techniques to detect diabetic retinopathy among aboriginal people in Central Australia. Contemporary Nurse, 1994, 2, 23–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
59.McConnell, E. A.The impact of machines on the work of critical care nurse. Critical Care Nursing Quarterly, 1990, 12, 45–52.Google Scholar
60.McKinley, S., Cade, J. F., Siganporia, R., et al. Clinical evaluation of closed loop control of blood pressure in seriously ill patients. Critical Care Medicine, 1991, 19, 166–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
61.Murchie, C. J., & Kenny, G. N. C.Nurses attitudes to automatic computer control of arterial pressure. Intensive Care Nursing, 1988, 4, 112–17.Google Scholar
62.Neighbors, M., Eldred, E., & Sullivan, M.Nursing skills necessary for competency in the high-tech health care system. Nursing and Health Care, 1991, 12, 92–96.Google ScholarPubMed
63.Pauly O'Neill, S.Questioning the use of invasive technology. American Journal of Nursing, 1991, 91, 19–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
64.Pelletier, D.The focused use of posters for graduate education in the complex technological nursing environment. Nurse Education Today, 1993, 13, 382–88.Google Scholar
65.Pelletier, D. Nursing in the ‘High Tech’ Environment. In Romanini, J., & Daly, J., (eds.), Critical Care Nursing. Sydney: Harcourt Brace and Jovanovich, 1994, 1039–62.Google Scholar
66.Pillar, B., Jacox, A., & Redman, B. K.Technology: Its assessment and nursing. Nursing Outlook, 1990, 38, 16—19.Google ScholarPubMed
67.Quivey, M.Advanced medical technology: Finding the answers. International Nursing Review, 1990, 37, 329–44.Google ScholarPubMed
68.Ray, M.Technological caring: A new model in critical care. Dimensions of Critical Care Nursing, 1987, 6, 166–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
69.Reiser, J. Technological environments as causes of suffering: The ethical context. In Starck, P. & Mcgovern, J., (eds.), The hidden dimension of illness: Human suffering. New York: National League of Nursing Press, 1992, 43–50.Google Scholar
70.Reiser, S., & Anbar, M., (eds.). The machine at the bedside: Strategies for using technology in patient care. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1978.Google Scholar
71.Rogers, M.High touch in a high tech future. National League of Nursing Publication, 1985, 41, 25–31.Google Scholar
72.Rothbert, M., Talarczyk, G., & Awbrey, I. Flexible models of nursing education: In Mccloskey, J., & Grace, H., (eds.), Current issues in nursing. St. Louis: C. V. Mosby, 1990, 130–35.Google Scholar
73.Sandelowski, M.Towards a theory of technology dependency. Nursing Outlook, 1993, 41, 36–42.Google Scholar
74.Shepherd, R., Gardynik, J., & Cleary, J.The challenge of disseminating new medical technologies: Treatment of cardiac arrhythmia. Quality Review Bulletin, 1990, 16, 229–33.Google Scholar
75.Sibbald, W., Escaf, M., & Calvin, J.How can new technology be introduced, evaluated and financed in critical care? Clinical Chemistry, 1990, 36, 1604–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
76.Sinclair, V.High technology in critical care: Implications for nursing's role and practice. Focus on Critical Care, 1988, 15, 37–41.Google Scholar
77.Wardell, D., & Engelbretson, J.Technology assessment for nursing innovations. Applied Nursing Research, 1993, 6, 172–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
78.White, D. Nurses and stress in the intensive care unit. Paper presented at NSW Nurses Research Symposium: Reaching for Relevance, 07, 1990, Sydney.Google Scholar
79.Wilkinson, R.New technology that will change key services. Hospitals, 1988, 62 (10), 56–61.Google ScholarPubMed
80.Wilson, G.Technology and stress. Nursing, 1991, 4, 31–34.Google Scholar
81.Wolf, G.Clinical nurse specialists: The second generation. Journal of Nursing Administration, 1990, 20, 7–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed