Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-5xszh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-29T11:26:53.328Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Cost-effectiveness of interventions to support self-care: A systematic review

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 October 2005

Gerry Richardson
Affiliation:
University of York
Hugh Gravelle
Affiliation:
University of York and University of Manchester
Helen Weatherly
Affiliation:
University of York
Gill Ritchie
Affiliation:
Royal College of General Practitioners

Abstract

Objectives: Interventions to support patient self-care of their condition aim to improve patient health and reduce health service costs. Consequently, they have attracted considerable policy interest. There is some evidence of clinical effectiveness but less attention has been paid to whether these interventions are cost-effective. This study examines the quality and quantity of existing evidence of the cost-effectiveness.

Methods: A systematic review was carried out to assess the extent and quality of economic evaluations of self-care support interventions. Thirty-nine economic evaluations were assessed against a quality checklist developed to reflect the special features of these interventions.

Results: The majority of the studies claimed that self-care support interventions were cost-effective or cost saving. The overall quality of economic evaluations was poor because of flaws in study designs, especially a narrow definition of relevant costs and short follow-up periods.

Conclusions: The current evidence base does not support any general conclusion that self-care support interventions are cost-effective, but ongoing trials may provide clearer evidence.

Type
GENERAL ESSAYS
Copyright
© 2005 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Albisser A, Harris R, Albisser JB, Sperlich M. 2001 The impact of initiatives in education, self-management training, and computer-assisted self-management on outcomes in diabetes disease management. Diabetes Technol Ther. 3: 571579.Google Scholar
Barlow J, Wright C, Sheasby J, Turner A., Hainsworth J. 2002 Self-management approaches for people with chronic conditions: A review. Patient Educ Counsel. 48: 177187.Google Scholar
Berg G, Wadhwa S. 2002 Diabetes disease management in a community-based setting. Manag Care. 11: 4250.Google Scholar
Bojke C, Gravelle H, Hassell K, Whittington Z. 2004 Increasing patient choice in the management of minor ailments in primary care. Health Econ. 13: 7386.Google Scholar
Bower P, Richards D, Lovell K. 2001 The clinical and cost-effectiveness of self-help treatments for anexiety and depressive disorders in primary care: a systematic review. Br J Gen Pract. 51: 838845.Google Scholar
Chiou C, Jay J, Wallance J, et al. 2003 Development and validation of a grading system for the quality of cost-effectiveness studies. Med Care. 326: 1279.Google Scholar
Cline C, Israelsson B, Willenheimer R, et al. 1998 Cost effective management programme for heart failure reduces hospitalisation. Heart. 80: 442446.Google Scholar
Lafata JE, Martin S, Kaatz S, Ward RE. 2002 Anticoagulation clinics and patient self-testing for patients on chronic warfarin therapy: A cost-effectiveness analysis. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 9: S13S19.Google Scholar
Engh CA Jr, Culpepper WJ 2nd, Charette PA, Brown R. 2001 Patient self-testing of prothrombin time after hip arthroplasty. J South Orthop Assoc. 10: 140146.Google Scholar
Department of Health. 2001. The expert patient: A new approach to chronic disease management in the 21st century. London: Stationery Office;
Donaldson L. 2003 Expert patients usher in a new era of opportunity for the NHS. BMJ. 326: 1279.Google Scholar
Drummond M, O'Brien B, Stoddart G, et al. 1997. Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press;
Drummond M, Pang F. 2001. Transferability of economic evaluation results, in Drummond and McGuire;
Fitzmaurice DA, Murray ET, Gee KM, Allan TF, Hobbs FD. 2002 A randomised controlled trial of patient self-management of oral anticoagulation treatment compared with primary care management. J Clin Pathol. 55: 845849.Google Scholar
Forbes C, Wilby J, Richardson G, et al. 2001 A systematic review and economic evaluation of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin hydrochloride for ovarian cancer. Health Technol Assess. 6: 23.Google Scholar
Gallefoss F, Bakke P. 2002 Cost-benefit and cost-effectiveness analysis of self-management in patients with COPID: A 1-year follow-up randomized, controlled trial. Respir Med. 96: 424431.Google Scholar
Gallefoss F, Bakke P. 2001 Cost-effectiveness of self-management in asthmatics: A 1-yr follow-up randomized, controlled trial. Eur Resp J. 17: 206213.Google Scholar
Ghosh CS, Ravindran P, Joshi M, Stearns SC. 1998 Reductions in hospital use from self-management training for chronic asthmatics. Soc Sci Med. 46: 10871093.Google Scholar
Glasgow RE, La Chance PA, Toobert DJ, Brown J, Hampson SE, Riddle MC. 1997 Long term effects and costs of brief behavioural dietary intervention for patients delivered from the medical office. Patient Educ Counsel. 32: 175184.Google Scholar
Gravelle H, Richardson G, Weatherly H, Ritchie G. An assessment of the quality of economic evaluations of self management. Report to the Department of Health. Available at: www.york.ac.uk/inst/che. Accessed July 2003.
Gray A, Raikou M, McGuire A, et al. 2000 Cost-effectiveness of an intensive blood glucose control policy in patients with type 2 diabetes: economic analysis alongside randomised controlled trial (UKPDS 41). BMJ. 320: 13751378.Google Scholar
Groessl E, Cronan T. 2000 A cost analysis of self-management programs for people with chronic illness. Am J Community Psychol. 28: 455480.Google Scholar
Humphreys K, Moos R. 2001 Can encouraging substance abuse patients to participate in self-help groups reduce demand for health care? A quasi-experimental study. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 25: 711716.Google Scholar
Jacobsen P, Meade C, Stein K, et al. 2002 Efficacy and costs of two forms of stress management training for cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 20: 28512862.Google Scholar
Kauppinen R, Sintonen H, Vilkka V, et al. 1999 Long-term (3-year) economic evaluation of intensive patient education for self-management during the first year in new asthmatics. Respir Med. 93: 283289.Google Scholar
Kauppinen R, Sintonen H, Tukiainen H. 1998 One-year economic evaluation of intensive vs conventional patient education and supervision for self-management of new asthmatic patients. Respir Med. 92: 300307.Google Scholar
Kauppinen R, Vilkka V, Sintonen H, et al. 2001 Long-term economic evaluation of intensive patient education during the first treatment year in newly diagnosed adult asthma. Respir Med. 95: 5663.Google Scholar
Kruger J, Helmick C, Callghan LF, et al. 1998 Cost-effectiveness of the arthritis self-help course. Arch Intern Med. 158: 12451249.Google Scholar
Lahdensuo A, Haahtela T, Herrala J, et al. 1998; Randomised comparison of cost-effectiveness of guided self-management and traditional treatment of asthma in Finland. BMJ. 316: 11381139.Google Scholar
Lord J, Victor C, Littlejohns P, et al. 1999 Economic evaluation of a primary care-based education programme for patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. Health Technol Assess. 3: 23: 55.Google Scholar
Lorig K, Mazonson P, Holman H. 1993 Evidence suggesting that health education for self-management in patients with chronic arthritis has sustained health benefits while reducing health care costs. Arthritis Rheum. 36: 439446.Google Scholar
Lorig K, Sobel D, Ritter P, et al. 2001 Effect of a self-management program on patients with chronic disease. Eff Clin Pract. 4: 256262.Google Scholar
Lorig K, Sobel DS, Stewart AL, et al. 1999 Evidence suggesting that a chronic disease self-management program can improve health status while reducing hospitalization. Med Care. 37: 514.Google Scholar
Lorig K, Ritter P, Stewart A, et al. 2001 Chronic disease self-management program: 2-year health status and health care utilization outcomes. Med Care. 39: 12171223.Google Scholar
Lorig K. 2003 Self-management education. More than a nice extra. Med Care. 41: 699701.Google Scholar
Mattson-Prince J. 1997 A rational approach to long-term care: Comparing the independent living model with agency-based care for persons with high spinal cord injuries. Spinal Cord. 35: 5:326331.Google Scholar
Mazzuca S, Brandt K, Katz BP, et al. 1999 Reduced utilization and cost of primary care clinic visits resulting from self-management education for patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. Arthritis Rheum. 42: 12671273.Google Scholar
Meier J, Swislocki A, Lopez JR, et al. 2002 Reduction in self-monitoring of blood glucose in persons with type 2 diabetes results in cost savings and no change in glycemic control. Am J Manag Care. 8: 557565.Google Scholar
Neri M, Migliori GB, Spanevello A, et al. 1996 Economic analysis of two structured treatment and teaching programs on asthma. Allergy. 51: 313319.Google Scholar
NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. 2001. Improving access to cost-effectiveness information for health care decision-making. The NHS Economic Evaluation Database. 2nd ed. Report 6. York: University of York;
Riemsma R, Taal E, Kirwan J, Rasker J. 2002 Patient education programmes for adults with rheumatoid arthritis. Benefits are small and short lived. BMJ. 325: 558559.Google Scholar
Robinson A. 2001 Guided self-management and patient-directed follow-up of ulcerative colitis: A randomised trial. Lancet. 358: 976981.Google Scholar
Rogers A, Bower P, Gravelle H, et al. Evaluating the Expert Patient Programme. National Primary Care Research and Development Centre, University of Manchester. Available at: http://www.npcrdc.man.ac.uk/. Accessed December 2002.
Rubin N, Foxman B. 1996 The cost-effectiveness of placing urinary tract infection treatment over the counter. J Clin Epidemiol. 49: 13151321.Google Scholar
Salkeld G, Phongsavan P, Oldenburg B, et al. 1997 The cost-effectiveness of a cardiovascular risk reduction program in general practice. Health Policy. 41: 105119.Google Scholar
Schermer T, Thoonen B, van den Boom G, et al. 2002 Randomized controlled economic evaluation of asthma self-management in primary health care. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 166: 10621072.Google Scholar
Sinclair S, Silcock J, Bond CM, et al. 1999 Cost-effectiveness of intensive pharmaceutical intervention in assisting people to stop smoking. Int J Pharmacy Pract. 7: 107112.Google Scholar
Starostina E, Antsiferov M, Galstyan GR, et al. 1994 Effectiveness and cost-benefit analysis of intensive treatment and teaching programmes for type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus in Moscow—Blood glucose versus urine glucose self-monitoring. Diabetologia. 37: 170176.Google Scholar
Taborski U, Wittstamm F, Bernando A, et al. 1999 Cost-effectiveness of self-managed anticoagulant therapy in Germany. Semin Thromb Hemost. 25: 103107.Google Scholar
Tschopp J, Frey J, Pernet R, et al. 2002 Bronchial asthma and self-management education: Implementation of Guidelines by an interdisciplinary programme in a health network: Study of respiratory education group (REG). Swiss Med Weekly. 132: 9297.Google Scholar
Volsko T. 1998 A pediatric asthma clinic pilot program reduces emergency department visits, hospitalizations, and cost of care. Respir Care. 43: 107113.Google Scholar
Von Korff M, Barlow W, Cherkin D, et al. 1994 Effects of practice style in managing back pain. Ann Intern Med. 121: 187195.Google Scholar
Watson M, Bond C, Grimshaw J, et al. 2002 Educational strategies to promote evidence-based community pharmacy practice: A cluster randomized controlled trial (RCT). Fam Pract. 19: 529536.Google Scholar
Weingarten S, Henning J, Badamgarev E, et al. 2002 Interventions used in disease management programmes for patients with chronic illness–which ones work? Meta-analysis of published reports. BMJ. 325: 925.Google Scholar
Wheeler J. 2003 Can a disease self-management program reduce health care costs?: The case of older women with heart disease. Med Care. 41: 706715.Google Scholar