Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-12T09:15:17.925Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Assessment of Coronary Bypass Surgery and Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2009

Thomas A. Preston
Thomas A. Preston
Affiliation:
Pacific Medical CenterUniversity of Washington, Seattle
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Coronary bypass surgery developed as another in a line of surgical procedures dating back more than 60 years. The medical profession at first assessed this procedure with time-honored anecdotal techniques. Gradually, for a variety of reasons, improved methods of comparisons worked their way into assessments of bypass surgery. Randomized controlled trials met resistance but have been very influential. Assessment of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty has benefited from the knowledge generated during the last 25 years, but clinicians have been slower to apply the most advanced techniques.

Type
Special Section: Technology Assessment and Surgical Policy
Information
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care , Volume 5 , Issue 3 , July 1989 , pp. 431 - 442
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCE

Alderman, E. L., Matloff, H. J., Wexler, L., et at. Results of direct coronary artery surgery for the treatment of angina pectoris. New England Journal of Medicine, 1973, 288, 535.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Block, T. A., Murray, J. A., & English, M. T.Improvement in exercise performance after unsuccessful myocardial revascularization. American Journal of Cardiology, 1977, 40, 673–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bonchek, L. I.Sounding board. Are randomized trials appropriate for evaluating new operations? New England Journal of Medicine, 1979, 301, 44–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brucshke, A. V., Proudfit, W. L., & Sones, M. F.Progress study of 509 consecutive non-surgical cases of coronary disease followed for 5–9 years. Circulation, 1973, 47, 1147–53.Google Scholar
CASS Principal Investigators and their Associates. Myocardial infarction and mortality in the coronary artery surgery study [CASS] randomized trial. New England Journal of Medicine, 1984, 310, 750–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Califf, R. M., Lee, K. L., Harrell, F. E., et al. Assessment of the use of the age- and sex- specific United States population as a control group for analysis of survival in coronary artery disease. American Journal of Cardiology, 1982, 50, 1279–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chait, L. O.Use of select mortality tables to reevaluate CABG [letter]. Circulation, 1982, 65, 1286.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chaitman, B. R., Fisher, L. D., Bourassa, M. G., et al. Effect of coronary bypass surgery on survival patterns in subsets of patients with left main coronary artery disease. American Journal of Cardiology, 1981, 48, 765–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chalmers, T. C.Randomization and coronary artery surgery. Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1972, 14, 323–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cohn, L. H., Boyden, C. M., & Collins, J. J.Improved long-term survival after aortocoronary bypass for advanced coronary artery disease. American Journal of Surgery, 1975, 129, 380-4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DeBakey, M. E.Aorto-coronary bypass. Assessment after 13 years. Journal of the American Medical Association, 1978, 239, 837–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunkman, W. B., Perloff, J. K., Kastor, J. A., & Shelburne, J. C.Medical perspectives in coronary artery surgery–A caveat. Annals of Internal Medicine, 1974, 81, 817–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Effler, D. B.Myocardial revascularization: Current state of the art. American Journal of Cardiology, 1975, 36, 849.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Favaloro, R. O.Saphenous vein autograft replacement of severe segmental coronary artery occlusion–operative technique. Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1968, 5, 334–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Favaloro, R. G.Saphenous vein graft in the surgical treatment of coronary artery disease. Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Diseases, 1969, 58, 178–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Favaloro, R. G.An aggressive surgical approach to coronary disease. Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Diseases, 1970, 59, 128–35.Google Scholar
Favaloro, R. G.Surgical treatment of coronary arteriosclerosis by the saphenous vein technique. American Journal of Cardiology, 1971, 28, 493–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, L. D., & Kennedy, J. W.Randomized surgical clinical trials for treatment of coronary artery disease. Controlled Clinical Trials, 1982, 3, 235–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garrett, H. E., Dennis, E. W., & DeBakey, M. E.Aortocoronary bypass with saphenous vein graft: Seven-year follow-up. Journal of the A merican Medical Association, 1973, 223, 792–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Green, D. G., Bunnello, I. L., Arani, D. T. et al. Long-term survival after coronary bypass surgery. Buffalo General Hospital, State University of New York, brochure for exhibit at American Heart Association meeting, Miami, 1977.Google Scholar
Green, G. E.Internal mammary artery-to-coronary artery anastomosis: Three year experience with 65 patients. Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1972, 14, 260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gresh, B. J., Kronmal, R. A., Schaff, H. V. et al. Comparison of coronary artery bypass surgery and medical therapy in patients 65 years of age or older. New England Journal of Medicine, 1985, 313, 217–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grondin, C. M., Meere, C., Gastonguay, et al. Blood flow through aorta-to-coronary artery bypass grafts and early postoperative patency: A study of 100 patients. Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1971, 12, 574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guerci, A. D., Gerstenblith, G., Brinker, J. A. et al. A randomized trial of intravenous tissue plasminogen activator for acute myocardial infarction with subsequent randomization to elective coronary angioplasty. New England Journal of Medicine, 1987, 317, 1613–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hammermeister, K. E., DeRouen, T. A., Murray, J. A., & Dodge, H. T.Effect of aortocoronary saphenous vein bypass grafting on death and sudden death. American Journal of Cardiology, 1977, 39, 925–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hampton, J. R.Coronary artery bypass grafting for the reduction of mortality: An analysis of the trials. British Medical Journal, 1984, 289, 1166–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Helton, W. C., Johnson, F. W., Hornung, J. et al. Treadmill exercise test following coronary artery surgery. In Norman, J. (Ed.), Coronary artery medicine & surgery, concepts and controversies. New York: Appleton-Century Crofts, 1975, 868–73.Google Scholar
Hurst, J. W., King, S. B., Logue, R. B. et al. Value of coronary bypass surgery. American Journal of Cardiology, 1978, 42, 308–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, W. D., Flemma, R. J., Lepley, D., & Ellison, E. H.Extended treatment of severe coronary artery disease: A total surgical approach. Annals of Surgery, 1969, 170, 460–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, W. D., Flemma, R. J., Manley, J. C., & Lepley, D.The physiologic parameters of ventricular function as affected by direct coronary surgery. Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 1970, 60, 483–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Killip, T., & Ryan, T. J.Randomized trials in coronary bypass surgery. Circulation, 1985, 71, 418–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kolessov, V. I.Mammary artery-coronary artery anastomosis as method of treatment for angina pectoris. Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 1967, 54, 535.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lawrie, G. M., Morris, G. C., Howell, J. F. et al. Results of coronary bypass more than 5 years after operation in 434 patients: Clinical, treadmill exercise and angiographic correlations. American Journal of Cardiology, 1977, 40, 665–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Luchi, R. J., Scott, S. M., Deupree, R. H. et al. Comparison of medical and surgical treatment for unstable angina pectoris. New England Journal of Medicine, 1987, 316, 977–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mathur, V. S. & Guinn, G. A.Propsective randomized study of coronary bypass surgery in stable angina. The first 100 patients. Circulation, 1975, Supplement 1, 51–52, 1–133–140.Google Scholar
McNeer, J. F., Starmer, C. F., Bartel, A. G. et al. The nature of treatment selection in coronary artery disease. Circulation, 1974, 49, 606–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mock, M. B., Reeder, G. S., Schaff, H. V. et al. Sounding Board. Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty versus coronary artery bypass. Isn't it time for a randomized trial? New England Journal of Medicine, 1985, 312, 916–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mundth, E. D., & Austen, W. G.Surgical measures for coronary heart disease. New England Journal of Medicine, 1975, 293, 124–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murphy, M. L., Hultgren, H. N., Detre, K. et al. Treatment of chronic stable angina. A preliminary report of survival data of the randomized Veterans Administration cooperative study. New England Journal of Medicine, 1977, 297, 621–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O'Neill, W., Timmis, G. C., Bourdillon, P. D. et al. A prospective randomized clinical trial of intracoronary streptokinase versus coronary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. New England Journal of Medicine, 1986, 314, 812–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Passamani, E., Davis, K. B., Gillespie, M. J. et al. A randomized trial of coronary artery bypass surgery. Survival of patients with a low ejection fraction. New England Journal of Medicine, 312, 1985, 1665–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Preston, T. A.Coronary artery surgery: A critical review. New York: Raven Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Preston, T. A.Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty-II. American Journal of Cardiology, 1980, 46, 344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preston, T. A.Marketing an operation. Atlantic, 1984, 254 (12), 32–40.Google Scholar
Ross, R. S.Surgery for coronary artery disease placed in perspective. Bulletin New York Academy of Medicine, 1972, 48, 1163–78.Google Scholar
Russek, H. I.Prognosis in severe angina pectoris due to triple coronary artery disease treated medically. American Journal of Cardiology, 1976, 37, 168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sauvage, L. R., Wood, S. J., Eyer, K. M., & Bill, A. H.Experimental coronary artery surgery. Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 1963, 46, 826.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seldon, R., Neill, W. A., Ritzmann, L. W. et al. Medical versus surgical therapy for acute coronary insufficiency. A randomized study. New England Journal of Medicine, 1975, 293, 1329–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Source: National Center for Health Statistics, and the Commission of Professional and Hospital Activities.Google Scholar
Spodick, D. H.Revascularization of the heart – Numerators in search of denominators. American Heart Journal, 1971, 81, 149–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spodick, D. H.The surgical mystique and the double standard. American Heart Journal, 1973, 85, 579–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Takaro, T., Hultgren, H. N., Lipton, M. J., & Detre, K. M.The VA cooperative randomized study of surgery for coronary arterial occlusive disease. II. Subgroup with significant left main lesions. Circulation, 1976, 54 (Suppl.III), III–107–117.Google ScholarPubMed
Topol, E. J., Califf, R. M., George, B. S. et al. A randomized trial of immediate versus delayed elective angioplasty after intravenous tissue plasmogen activator in acute myocardial infarction. New England Journal of Medicine, 1987, 317, 581–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Unstable angina pectoris: National cooperative study group to compare surgical and medical therapy. American Journal of Cardiology, 1978, 42, 839–48.Google Scholar
Varnauskas, E.Twelve-year follow-up of survival in the randomized European coronary surgery study. New England Journal of Medicine, 1988, 319, 332–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
White, P. D.The psyche and the soma: The spiritual and physical attributes of the heart. Annals of Internal Medicine, 1951, 35, 1291.Google ScholarPubMed