Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-747cfc64b6-65n5b Total loading time: 0.154 Render date: 2021-06-17T18:47:49.776Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true }

IMPACT OF HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT ON PREVENTIVE SCREENING IN BELGIUM

Case Studies of Mammography in Breast Cancer, PSA Screening in Prostate Cancer, and Ultrasound in Normal Pregnancy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 September 2001

Veerle Vermeulen
Affiliation:
Centre for Health Services and Nursing Research, University of Leuven
Katja Coppens
Affiliation:
Centre for Health Services and Nursing Research, University of Leuven
Katrien Kesteloot
Affiliation:
Centre for Health Services and Nursing Research and University Hospital Leuven

Abstract

Objective: To describe how scientific evidence has influenced healthcare policy making in Belgium in the field of sickness prevention for mammography, PSA testing in prostate cancer screening, and use of ultrasound in pregnancy.

Methods: Review of published and gray literature and interviews with stakeholders and experts.

Results: At the end of 1999, a systematic national/regional screening program had not yet been implemented for any of the three screening strategies. A systematic breast cancer screening program is being prepared for implementation only in Flanders. This limited impact can be attributed to the fragmentation in healthcare policy, the different options among the different regions, fragmentation in healthcare practice, the strong impact of healthcare stakeholders (provider groups and sickness funds) on decision making, and limited attention to scientific evidence in health policy and technology assessment.

Conclusions: Health technology assessment has had very little impact on policy and practice in use of mammography, PSA testing, and ultrasound in pregnancy in Belgium.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2001 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.
5
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

IMPACT OF HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT ON PREVENTIVE SCREENING IN BELGIUM
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

IMPACT OF HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT ON PREVENTIVE SCREENING IN BELGIUM
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

IMPACT OF HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT ON PREVENTIVE SCREENING IN BELGIUM
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *