Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-99c86f546-4k54s Total loading time: 0.227 Render date: 2021-12-01T08:02:58.594Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

How guidance on the use of interventional procedures is produced in different countries: An international survey

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 April 2009

Jonathan Plumb
Affiliation:
National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence
Bruce Campbell
Affiliation:
National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence
Georgios Lyratzopoulos
Affiliation:
National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence

Abstract

Objectives: Technology assessment systems for interventional procedures (including surgical operations, minimally invasive procedures, and others) have lagged behind those for pharmaceutical treatments. Such systems have been introduced in some countries during the past decade amid debate about how they should be organized, but there is no collated information about where they exist or how they work. This study was designed to provide hitherto unavailable information about the existence, organization, methods, and outputs of systems aimed at influencing the use of interventional procedures in different countries.

Methods: Data were gathered from a questionnaire survey of key informers associated with healthcare technology assessment (HTA) organizations in different countries.

Results: Responses were received from key informers working for twenty-eight HTA organizations in twenty-five countries (response rate 83 percent). Information about a national system for assessing interventional procedures was obtained for fifteen countries. There was substantial variability in the type and funding of these organizations, the systems used for the selection of procedures, the types and sources of evidence used, the personnel involved in the appraisal of the evidence, the arrangements for consultation on the draft assessment, the format of assessment recommendations, the status of the guidance, and the use of guidance from other countries.

Conclusion: Guidance on interventional procedures is produced variably in different countries—and not at all in some. Greater international collaboration in the assessment of new interventional procedures could help to optimize the efficiency of existing systems as well as the quality of the assessments, by capitalizing on the outputs from scarce (international) resources and expertise.

Type
General Essays
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Campbell, WB, Barnes, SJ, Kirby, RA et al. , Association of study type, sample size, and follow-up length with type of recommendation produced by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence Interventional Procedures Programme. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2007;23:101107.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2. Draborg, E, Andersen, C. Recommendations in health technology assessments worldwide. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2006;22:155160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Lyratzopoulos, G, Hoy, AR, Veeramootoo, D, Shanmuganathan, NV, Campbell, B. Influence of expert clinical adviser characteristics on opinions about interventional procedures. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2008;24:166169.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. Martelli, F, La Torre, G, Di Ghionno, E et al. , Health technology assessment agencies: An international overview of organizational aspects. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2007;23:414424.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5 National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Interventional Procedures Guidance 233: Endovascular stent insertion for intracranial atherosclerotic disease. 24 October 2007. http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/IPG233/guidance/pdf/English (accessed December 2008).Google Scholar
6. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Interventional Procedures Guidance 251. Liposuction for chronic lymphoedema. February 2008. http://www.nice.org.uk/Guidance/IPG251/NiceGuidance/pdf/English (accessed December 2008).Google Scholar
7. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Interventional Procedures Guidance 413: Endobronchial ultrasound guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) for mediastinal metastases. 27 February 2008. http://www.nice.org.uk/Guidance/IPG254/Guidance/pdf/English (ac-cessed December 2008).Google Scholar
8. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence: The Interventional Procedures Programme–Programme Manual. http://www.nice.org.uk/aboutnice/howwework/developingniceinterventionalprocedures/interventionalproceduresprogrammemanual/the_interventional_procedures_programme__programme_manual.jsp (accessed December 2008).Google Scholar
9. Wilson, CB. Adoption of new surgical technology. BMJ. 2006;332:112114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

How guidance on the use of interventional procedures is produced in different countries: An international survey
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

How guidance on the use of interventional procedures is produced in different countries: An international survey
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

How guidance on the use of interventional procedures is produced in different countries: An international survey
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *