Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-888d5979f-9v52d Total loading time: 0.164 Render date: 2021-10-25T11:40:29.712Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

EXPANDING EVIDENCE-BASED TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT FOR COVERAGE IN WASHINGTON STATE

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2016

Erik J. Landaas
Affiliation:
University of Washington School of Pharmacy erikl@uw.edu
Gary Franklin
Affiliation:
Washington State Department of Labor & Industries, Office of the Medical DirectorUniversity of Washington School of Public Health
Jeff Thompson
Affiliation:
Willis Towers Watson
Dan Lessler
Affiliation:
Washington State Health Care Authority
Josiah Morse
Affiliation:
Washington State Health Care Authority
Robert Mootz
Affiliation:
Washington State Department of Labor & Industries, Office of the Medical Director
Steven G. Hammond
Affiliation:
Washington State Department of Corrections
Sean D. Sullivan
Affiliation:
University of Washington School of Pharmacy

Abstract

Objectives: We describe a new evidence-based method for screening and evaluating emerging medical technologies. Washington State agencies, under legislative direction, have granted authority to its agency Medical Directors and policy leaders to make coverage decisions on medical technologies using a “dossier” process. The dossier process is employed when technology advocates or manufacturers request Washington State healthcare purchasers to pay for new and emerging technologies. This offers the advocate an opportunity to submit scientific evidence and information classically associated with a more formal health technology assessment.

Methods: The submitted information is independently reviewed and summarized for Washington State's public healthcare purchasers allowing a more standardized coverage decision for all public purchasers in Washington State.

Results: This process has allowed Washington State to make twelve evidence-based coverage decisions at a fraction of the cost of classic technology assessment. To date, of twelve reviews over 6 years, one health technology was approved for coverage, ten were not covered and one did not require a coverage decision.

Conclusions: This evidence-based dossier process has yielded high-value coverage decisions of new and emerging medical technologies for public healthcare purchasers in Washington State.

Type
Methods
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Prescription Drug Program legislation. http://lawfilesext.leg.wa.gov/biennium/2003-04/Pdf/Bills/Session%20Laws/Senate/6088.SL.pdf (accessed September 30, 2015).Google Scholar
2. WA State Health Technology Assessment Program legislation. http://lawfilesext.leg.wa.gov/biennium/2005-06/Pdf/Bills/Session%20Laws/House/2575-S2.SL.pdf (accessed September 30, 2015).Google Scholar
3. Franklin, G, Budenholzer, B. Implementing evidence-based health policy in Washington State. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:17221725.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. Washington Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Program. http://www.hca.wa.gov/hta/Pages/index.aspx (accessed September 30, 2015)Google Scholar
5. Washington State Legislature, Medical and dental coverage – Fee for service prior authorization – Determination for payment. http://app.leg.wa.gov/wac/default.aspx?cite=182-501-0165 (accessed November 2, 2015).Google Scholar
6. Ramsey, SD, Luce, BR, Deyo, R, Franklin, G. The limited state of technology assessment for medical devices: Facing the issues. Am J Manag Care. 1998;4 Spec No:SP188-99.Google ScholarPubMed
7. Franklin, GM, Lifka, J, Milstein, J. Device evaluation and coverage policy in workers’ compensation: Examples from Washington State. Am J Manag Care. 1998;4 Spec No:SP178-86Google ScholarPubMed
8. Blue Cross Blue Shield Center for Clinical Effectiveness (CCE). http://www.bcbs.com/cce/ (accessed July 14, 2016).Google Scholar
9. Garber, AM. Evidence-based coverage policy. Health Affairs. 2001;20:6282.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

EXPANDING EVIDENCE-BASED TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT FOR COVERAGE IN WASHINGTON STATE
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

EXPANDING EVIDENCE-BASED TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT FOR COVERAGE IN WASHINGTON STATE
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

EXPANDING EVIDENCE-BASED TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT FOR COVERAGE IN WASHINGTON STATE
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *