Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T13:14:34.011Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

PROCORAD’s international proficiency testing for radio-bioassays

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 December 2010

R. Fottorino
Affiliation:
CEA Cadarache, LABM, Bâtiment 102, 13108 Saint-Paul-Lez-Durance, France
M. Ruffin
Affiliation:
CEA Cadarache, LABM, Bâtiment 102, 13108 Saint-Paul-Lez-Durance, France
Ph. Bérard
Affiliation:
PROCORAD Scientific Council, CEA DSV, BP 6, 92265 Fontenay-aux-Roses Cedex, France
Get access

Abstract

In France, the Clinical Biochemistry Laboratories (CBL) are in charge of the monitoring of nuclear workers. These laboratories must be accredited and have ministerial certification. The accreditation of radiobioassay analyses requires notably Proficiency Testing (PT) between laboratories. One of the most important PT providers, in this field, is the PROCORAD association. The specifics are to provide real biological samples spiked with various radionuclides and to send them around international CBL. The results obtained by the all laboratories are both statistically and anonymously exploited, thanks to homemade software entitled Procostat. PROCORAD PT’s program answers to a definite demand from laboratories in charge of monitoring workers, for some years more than 70 participants from all over the world have signed up to participate in these comparison exercises. Apart from an assessment of the different laboratories performance, the comparison exercises organized by the PROCORAD’s association enable the Clinical Biochemistry Laboratories to evaluate the techniques implemented in terms of accuracy, reproducibility and specificity.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© EDP Sciences 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Références

ISO/IEC 17025, General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories
Bérard, P., Harduin, J.C., Briot, F., Cavadore, D., International RadioBioassay quality controls, Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 79, 509512 (1998) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ISO/IEC 17043, Conformity assessment – General requirements for proficiency testing (2010)
Bérard, P., Harduin, J.C., Cavadore, D., Interlaboratory Comparisons: determination of actinides in excreta, J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 197, 357368 (1995) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bérard, P., Montègue, A., Briot, F., Procorad’s international intercomparisons highlight the evolution of techniques used to determine uranium in urine, Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 105, 447450 (2003) CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
FD CEN/TR 10345, Guideline for statistical data treatment of interlaboratory tests for validation of analytical methods (A06-002) (2008)
FD ISO/TR 22971, Accuracy (trueness and precision) of measurement methods and results– Practical guidance for the use of ISO 5725-2:1994 in designing, implementing and statistically analysing interlaboratory repeatability and reproducibility results (X06-044) (2005)
NF ISO 13538, Statistical methods for use in proficiency testing by interlaboratory comparisons (X06-510) (2005)
American National Standards Institute (ANSI), Performance Criteria for Radiobioassay (1996), HPS N13.30-1996
ISO 12790-1 standard, Radiation Protection – Performance Criteria for Radiobioassay – Part 1: General Principles