No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
The Liability of the Government in France as a Consequence of its Legal Activities
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 February 2019
Extract
The concept of liability on the part of the government as a consequence of its legal activities in the legislative as well as in the judicial field is one of the major achievements of French legal doctrine and jurisprudence. Although conditions for such liability still present some difficulties, the fact that the government now accepts liability as a principle for any harm created by the laws or by court decisions has uncovered a new area of legal development.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © 1983 by International Association of Law Libraries
References
Ardant, Philippe. La responsabilité de l'État du fait de la fonction juridictionnelle. Paris, Librairie Générale du Droit et de Jurisprudence, 1956. 291 p.Google Scholar
Auby, Jean Marie. La responsabilité de l'État en matière de justice judiciaire, Actualtié juridique, Droit administratif 4-12 (January, 1973).Google Scholar
Burdeau, Georges. Droit constitutionnel et institutions politiques. Paris, Librairie Générale du Droit et de Jurisprudence, 1977. 690 p.Google Scholar
Carrow, Milton. Sovereign immunity in administrative law, a new diagnosis, 9 Journal of public law 1-23 (1960).Google Scholar
Chapus, René. Responsabilité publique et responsabilité privée. Les influences réciproques des jurisprudences administrative et judicaire. Paris, Libraire Générale du Droit et de Jurisprudence, 1954. 583 p.Google Scholar
Duguit, Léon. Traité de droit constitutionnel, v. 7. Paris, E. de Boccard, 1924. 800 p.Google Scholar
Duverger, Maurice. Constitutions et documents politiques. Paris, Presses Universitaires de France, 1974. 821 p.Google Scholar
L'Évolution du droit public; Études offertes à Achille Mestre… . Paris, Sirey, 1956. 574 p.Google Scholar
Governmental tort liability, in the Soviet Union, Bulgaria, Czechoslovakia, Hungary, Poland, Roumania and Yugoslavia. Leyden, A. W. Sijthoff, 1970. 327 p.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Clyde E. The eleventh amendment and sovereign immunity. Westport, Connecticut, Greenwood Press, 1972. 216 p.Google Scholar
Lombard, Martine. Fonction juridictionnelle et la loi de 5 juillet 1972, 91 Revue du Droit Pubic et de la science politique en France et à l'étranger 585-634 (1975).Google Scholar
Long, Marceau, Weil, Pierre, and Braibant, Georges. Les grands arrěts de la jurisprudence administrative. Paris, Sirey, 1974. 611 p.Google Scholar
Morange, Georges. L'irresponsabilité de l'État législateur. Chronique, p. 163–168. Recueil Hebdomadaire Dalloz, 1962.Google Scholar
National Association of Attorneys General. Committee on the Office of the Attorney General. Sovereign immunity; the tort liability of the government and its officials. Raleigh, North Carolina, 1976. 103 p.Google Scholar
Odent, Raymond. Contentieux administratif …. Paris, Cours de droit, 1966. 4 v. (See vol. 3.)Google Scholar
Savatier, René. Vers la socialisation de la responsabilité et des risques individuels? Chronique, p. 9–12. Recueil Hebdomadaire Dalloz, 1931.Google Scholar
Vedel, Georges. Droit administratif. Paris, Presses Universitaires de France, 1973. 902 P.Google Scholar