Hostname: page-component-5d59c44645-k78ct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-02-21T05:10:20.971Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Introduction: elusive equalities – sex, gender and women

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 December 2014

Extract

Despite the fact that the Millennium Development Goals promised to achieve gender equality and maternal health by 2015, equality remains elusive for too many women. Indeed, austerity, the rise of fundamentalism and the continuing gendered division of labour, especially when it comes to socially necessary but unremunerated care work, have contributed to the increase in gendered inequalities in many areas of social life and in most regions of the world. There is a plenitude of international, transnational and national equality instruments and strategies at the same time as gendered inequality is increasing both within and between nations. These equality instruments and strategies have also had an uneven impact: some women benefit more than others. Moreover, if interpreted in a formal manner, equality can be achieved as much through levelling down men's employment opportunities as by elevating women's life chances.

Type
Introduction
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Refrerences

Beck, Ulrick (1992) The Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Burton, Becci (2014) ‘Neoliberalism and the Equality Act 2010: A Missed Opportunity for Gender Justice?’, Industrial Law Journal 43: 122148.Google Scholar
Deakin, Simon and Koukiadaki, Aristea (2014) ‘The Sovereign Debt Crisis and the Evolution of Labour Law in Europe’, In Countouris, Nicola and Freedland, Mark (eds), Resocialising Europe: In a Time of Crisis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 165188.Google Scholar
Fraser, Nancy (2009) Scales of Justice: Reimaging Political Space in a Globalizing World. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Fraser, Nancy (2011) ‘Marketization, Social Protection, Emancipation: Toward a Neo-Polanyian Conception of Capitalist Crisis’, in Calhoun, Craig and Derluguian, Georgi (eds), Business as Usual: The Roots of the Global Financial Meltdown. New York: New York University Press, 137159.Google Scholar
Fredman, Sandra (2011) ‘The Potential and Limits of an Equal Rights Paradigm in Addressing Poverty’, Stellenbosch Law Review 22: 566590.Google Scholar
Gonas, Lena (2002) ‘Balancing Family and Work: To Create a New Social Order’, Economic and Industrial Democracy 23: 5966.Google Scholar
Jenson, Jane (1989) ‘Paradigms and Political Discourse: Protective Legislation in France and the United States Before 1914’, Canadian Journal of Political Science 22: 235258.Google Scholar
Rubery, Jill (2014) ‘From “Women and Recession” to “Women and Austerity”: A Framework for Analysis’, In Karamessini, Maria and Rubery, Jill (eds), Women and Austerity: The Economic Crisis and the Future for Gender Equality. London and New York: Routledge, 1737.Google Scholar
Stewart, Ann (2013) ‘Gender, Justice and Law in a Global Market’, In Davies, Margaret and Munro, Vanessa (eds), A Research Companion to Feminist Legal Theory. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing, 341360.Google Scholar