Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-747cfc64b6-zm8ws Total loading time: 0.246 Render date: 2021-06-12T21:19:56.960Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true }

Archaeology and Autonomies: The Legal Framework of Heritage Management in a New Bolivia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 December 2011

Donna Yates
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeology, University of Cambridge. Email: dey21@cam.ac.uk
Corresponding
E-mail address:

Abstract

The 2009 Bolivian Constitution significantly changed the structure of the state and paved the way for the creation of regional, local, and even indigenous autonomies. These autonomies are charged with the management of archaeological sites and museums within their territory. This article answers the question of who currently owns the Bolivian past, it stems from concerns raised at the 2011 renewal hearing of the Memorandum of Understanding preventing the import of illicit Bolivian antiquities into the United States. By combining an analysis of recent legal changes related to the creation of the autonomies and a short discussion of a notable case study of local management of a Bolivian archaeological site, this article offers a basic summary of the legal framework in which Bolivian archaeology and heritage management functions and some preliminary recommendations for governments and professionals wishing to work with Bolivian authorities at the state and local level.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Cultural Property Society 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

References

Albro, Robert. “The Culture of Democracy and Bolivia's Indigenous Moments.” Critique of Anthropology 26 (2006): 387410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs. Canada. ⟨http://exchanges.state.gov/heritage/culprop/cafact.html⟩ (n.d.) accessed 18 October 2011.Google Scholar
Dangl, Benjamin. The Price of Fire: Resource Wars and Social Movements in Bolivia. Oakland, CA: AK Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Gasparini, Graziano. “Mejor Conservar que Restaurar.” Boletin del Centro del Investigaciones Historicas y Esteticas 16 (1973).Google Scholar
Janusek, John W.Khonkho Wankane.” Website of the Jach'a Machaca Archaeological Project. ⟨http://www.khonkhowankane.org/khonkho_5.html⟩ (n.d.) accessed 18 October 2011.Google Scholar
Kohl, Benjamin. “Privatization Bolivian Style: A Cautionary Tale.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 28 (2004): 893908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohl, Benjamin, and Farthing, Linda. Impasse in Bolivia: Neoliberal Hegemony and Popular Resistance. London: Zed Books, 2006.Google Scholar
Mamani Condori, Carlos. “History and Prehistory in Bolivia: What About the Indians?” In Conflict and the Archaeology of Living Traditions, edited by Layton, Robert, 4649. London: Routledge, 1989.Google Scholar
Ponce Sanginés, Carlos. Tiwanaku: 200 Años de Investigaciones Arqueológicos. La Paz: Producciones Cima, 1995.Google Scholar
Rivera Cusicanqui, Silvia. “La Antropología y Arqueología en Bolivia: Límites y Perspectivas.” América Indígena 40 (1980): 217–24.Google Scholar
Sammells, Clare. “Touristic Narratives and Historical Networks: Politics and Authority in Tiwanaku, Bolivia.” PhD diss., Department of Anthropology, University of Chicago, 2009.Google Scholar
Van Cott, Donna Lee. “From Exclusion to Inclusions: Bolivia's 2002 Elections.” Journal of Latin American Studies 35 (2003): 751–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yates, Donna. “Archaeological Practice and Political Change: Transitions and Transformations in the Use of the Past in Nationalist, Neoliberal and Indigenous Bolivia.” PhD diss., Department of Archaeology, University of Cambridge, 2011.Google Scholar
8
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Archaeology and Autonomies: The Legal Framework of Heritage Management in a New Bolivia
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Archaeology and Autonomies: The Legal Framework of Heritage Management in a New Bolivia
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Archaeology and Autonomies: The Legal Framework of Heritage Management in a New Bolivia
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *