Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xfwgj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-22T23:27:34.489Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The habitable zone of Kepler-16: impact of binarity and climate models

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 March 2018

S. Y. Moorman
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Texas at Arlington, Box 19059, Arlington, TX 76019, USA
B. L. Quarles
Affiliation:
Homer L. Dodge Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019, USA
Zh. Wang
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Texas at Arlington, Box 19059, Arlington, TX 76019, USA
M. Cuntz*
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Texas at Arlington, Box 19059, Arlington, TX 76019, USA
*
Author for correspondence: M. Cuntz, E-mail: cuntz@uta.edu

Abstract

We continue to investigate the binary system Kepler-16, consisting of a K-type main-sequence star, a red dwarf and a circumbinary Saturnian planet. As part of our study, we describe the system's habitable zone based on different climate models. We also report on stability investigations for possible Earth-mass Trojans while expanding a previous study by B. L. Quarles and collaborators given in 2012. For the climate models, we carefully consider the relevance of the system's parameters. Furthermore, we pursue new stability simulations for the Earth-mass objects starting along the orbit of Kepler-16b. The eccentricity distribution as obtained prefers values close to circular, whereas the inclination distribution remains flat. The stable solutions are distributed near the co-orbital Lagrangian points, thus enhancing the plausibility that Earth-mass Trojans might be able to exist in the Kepler-16(AB) system.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Airapetian, VS, Glocer, A, Khazanov, GV, Loyd, ROP, France, K, Sojka, J, Danchi, WC and Liemohn, MW (2017) How hospitable are space weather affected habitable zones? The role of ion escape. Astrophysical Journal Letters 836, L3.Google Scholar
Armstrong, DJ, Osborn, HP, Brown, DJA, Faedi, F, Gómez Maqueo, Chew Y, Martin, DV, Pollacco, D and Udry, S (2014) On the abundance of circumbinary planets. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 444, 1873.Google Scholar
Baraffe, I, Chabrier, G, Allard, F and Hauschildt, PH (1998) Evolutionary models for solar metallicity low-mass stars: mass-magnitude relationships and color-magnitude diagrams. Astronomy and Astrophysics 337, 403.Google Scholar
Chambers, JE, Quintana, EV, Duncan, MJ and Lissauer, JJ (2002) Symplectic Integrator Algorithms for Modeling Planetary Accretion in Binary Star Systems. Astronomical Journal 123, 2884.Google Scholar
Cuntz, M (2014) S-type and P-type habitability in stellar binary systems: a comprehensive approach. I. Method and applications. Astrophysical Journal 780, 14.Google Scholar
Cuntz, M (2015) S-type and P-type habitability in stellar binary systems: a comprehensive approach. II. Elliptical orbits. Astrophysical Journal 798, 101.Google Scholar
Cuntz, M and Guinan, EF (2016) About exobiology: the case for dwarf K stars. Astrophysical Journal 827, 79.Google Scholar
Doyle, LR, Carter, JA, Fabrycky, DC, Slawson, RW, Howell, SB, Winn, JN, Orosz, JA, Prša, A, Welsh, WF, Quinn, SN, Latham, D, Torres, G, Buchhave, LA, Marcy, GW, Fortney, JJ, Shporer, A, Ford, EB, Lissauer, JJ, Ragozzine, D, Rucker, M, Batalha, N, Jenkins, JM, Borucki, WJ, Koch, D, Middour, CK, Hall, JR, McCauliff, S, Fanelli, MN, Quintana, EV, Holman, MJ, Caldwell, DA, Still, M, Stefanik, RP, Brown, WR, Esquerdo, GA, Tang, S, Furesz, G, Geary, JC, Berlind, P, Calkins, ML, Short, DR, Steffen, JH, Sasselov, D, Dunham, EW, Cochran, WD, Boss, Alan, Haas, MR, Buzasi, D and Fischer, D (2011) Kepler-16: a transiting circumbinary planet. Science 333, 1602.Google Scholar
Dvorak, R (1982) Planetary orbits in double star systems. Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Sitzungsberichte 191, 423.Google Scholar
Eggl, S, Haghighipour, N and Pilat-Lohinger, E (2013) Detectability of Earth-like planets in circumstellar habitable zones of binary star systems with Sun-like components. Astrophysical Journal 764, 130.Google Scholar
Grazier, KR, Newman, WI, Varadi, F, Goldstein, DJ and Kaula, WM (1996) Integrators for long-term solar system dynamical simulations. Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society 28, 1181.Google Scholar
Haghighipour, N and Kaltenegger, L (2013) Calculating the habitable zone of binary star systems. II. P-type binaries. Astrophysical Journal 777, 166.Google Scholar
Halevy, I, Pierrehumbert, RT and Schrag, DP (2009) Radiative transfer in CO2-rich paleoatmospheres. Journal of Geophysical Research 114, D18112.Google Scholar
Holman, MJ and Wiegert, PA (1999) Long-term stability of planets in binary systems. Astronomical Journal 117, 621.Google Scholar
Jones, BW, Sleep, PN and Chambers, JE (2001) The stability of the orbits of terrestrial planets in the habitable zones of known exoplanetary systems. Astronomy and Astrophysics 366, 254.Google Scholar
Kaltenegger, L (2017) How to characterize habitable worlds and signs of life. Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics 55, 433.Google Scholar
Kane, SR and Hinkel, NR (2013) On the habitable zones of circumbinary planetary systems. Astrophysical Journal 762, 7.Google Scholar
Kasting, JF, Whitmore, DP and Reynolds, RT (1993) Habitable zones around main sequence stars. Icarus 101, 108.Google Scholar
Kasting, JF, Kopparapu, R, Ramirez, RM and Harman, CE (2014) Remote life-detection criteria, habitable zone boundaries, and the frequency of Earth-like planets around M and late K stars. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111, 12641.Google Scholar
Kirk, B, Conroy, K, Prša, A, Abdul-Masih, M, Kochoska, A, Matijevič, G, Hambleton, K, Barclay, T, Bloemen, S, Boyajian, T, Doyle, LR, Fulton, BJ, Hoekstra, AJ, Jek, K, Kane, SR, Kostov, V, Latham, D, Mazeh, T, Orosz, JA, Pepper, J, Quarles, B, Ragozzine, D, Shporer, A, Southworth, J, Stassun, K, Thompson, SE, Welsh, WF, Agol, E, Derekas, A, Devor, J, Fischer, D, Green, G, Gropp, J, Jacobs, T, Johnston, C, LaCourse, DM, Saetre, K, Schwengeler, H, Toczyski, J, Werner, G, Garrett, M, Gore, J, Martinez, AO, Spitzer, I, Stevick, J, Thomadis, PC, Vrijmoet, EH, Yenawine, M, Batalha, N and Borucki, W (2016) Kepler eclipsing binary stars. VII. The catalog of eclipsing binaries found in the entire Kepler data set. Astronomical Journal 151, 68.Google Scholar
Kirkpatrick, JD, Henry, TJ and McCarthy, DW Jr (1991) A standard stellar spectral sequence in the red/near-infrared – classes K5 to M9. Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series 77, 417.Google Scholar
Kitzmann, D (2016) Revisiting the scattering greenhouse effect of CO2 ice clouds. Astrophysical Journal Letters 817, L18.Google Scholar
Kopparapu, RK, Ramirez, R, Kasting, JF, Eymet, V, Robinson, TD, Mahadevan, S, Terrien, RC, Domagal-Goldman, S, Meadows, V and Deshpande, R (2013) Habitable zones around main-sequence stars: new estimates. Astrophysical Journal 765, 131; Erratum 770, 82.Google Scholar
Kopparapu, RK, Ramirez, RM, SchottelKotte, J, Kasting, JF, Domagal-Goldman, S and Eymet, V (2014) Habitable zones around main-sequence stars: dependence on planetary mass. Astrophysical Journal 787, L29.Google Scholar
Kostov, VB, Orosz, JA, Welsh, WF, Doyle, LR, Fabrycky, DC, Haghighipour, N, Quarles, B, Short, DR, Cochran, WD, Endl, M, Ford, EB, Gregorio, J, Hinse, TC, Isaacson, H, Jenkins, JM, Jensen, ELN, Kane, S, Kull, I, Latham, DW, Lissauer, JJ, Marcy, GW, Mazeh, T, Müller, TWA, Pepper, J, Quinn, SN, Ragozzine, D, Shporer, A, Steffen, JH, Torres, G, Windmiller, G and Borucki, WJ (2016) Kepler-1647b: the largest and longest-period Kepler transiting circumbinary planet. Astrophysical Journal 827, 86.Google Scholar
Lammer, H (2007) M star planet habitability. Astrobiology 7, 27.Google Scholar
Lammer, H, Bredehöft, JH, Coustenis, A, Coustenis, A, Khodachenko, ML, Kaltenegger, L, Grasset, O, Prieur, D, Raulin, F, Ehrenfreund, P, Yamauchi, M, Wahlund, J-E, Grießmeier, J-M, Stangl, G, Cockell, CS, Kulikov, YuN, Grenfell, JL and Rauer, H (2009) What makes a planet habitable? Astronomy and Astrophysics Reviews 17, 181.Google Scholar
Mann, AW, Gaidos, E and Ansdell, M (2013) Spectro-thermometry of M dwarfs and their candidate planets: too hot, too cool, or just right? Astrophysical Journal 779, 188.Google Scholar
Mischna, MA, Kasting, JF, Pavlov, A and Freedman, R (2000) Influence of carbon dioxide clouds on early martian climate. Icarus 145, 546.Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, R and Gaidos, E (2011) Hydrogen greenhouse planets beyond the habitable zone. Astrophysical Journal Letters 734, L13.Google Scholar
Popp, M and Eggl, S (2017) 3D climate simulations of an Earth-like circumbinary planet. 19th European Geosciences Union General Assembly EGU2017, 9885.Google Scholar
Press, WH, Flannery, BP, Teukolsky, SA and Vetterling, WT (1986) Numerical Recipes: The Art of Scientific Computing. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Quarles, B, Musielak, ZE and Cuntz, M (2012) Habitability of Earth-mass planets and moons in the Kepler-16 system. Astrophysical Journal 750, 14 (QMC12).Google Scholar
Raghavan, D, Henry, TJ, Mason, BD, Subasavage, JP, Jao, W-C, Beaulieu, TD and Hambly, NC (2006) Two Suns in the sky: stellar multiplicity in exoplanet systems. Astrophysical Journal 646, 523.Google Scholar
Raghavan, D, McAlister, HA, Henry, TJ, Latham, DW, Marcy, GW, Mason, BD, Gies, DR, White, RJ and ten Brummelaar, TA (2010) A survey of stellar families: multiplicity of solar-type stars. Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series 190, 1.Google Scholar
Roell, T, Neuhäuser, R, Seifahrt, A and Mugrauer, M (2012) Extrasolar planets in stellar multiple systems. Astronomy and Astrophysics 542, A92.Google Scholar
Seager, S (2013) Exoplanet habitability. Science 340, 577.Google Scholar
Selsis, F, Kasting, JF, Levrard, B, Paillet, J, Ribas, I and Delfosse, X (2007) Habitable planets around the star Gliese 581? Astronomy and Astrophysics 476, 1373.Google Scholar
Shevchenko, II (2017) Habitability properties of circumbinary planets. Astronomical Journal 153, 273.Google Scholar
Slawson, RW, Prša, A, Welsh, WF, Orosz, JA, Rucker, M, Batalha, N, Doyle, LR, Engle, SG, Conroy, K, Coughlin, J, Gregg, TA, Fetherolf, T, Short, DR, Windmiller, G, Fabrycky, DC, Howell, SB, Jenkins, JM, Uddin, K, Mullally, F, Seader, SE, Thompson, SE, Sanderfer, DT, Borucki, W and Koch, D (2011) Kepler eclipsing binary stars. II. 2165 eclipsing binaries in the second data release. Astronomical Journal 142, 160.Google Scholar
Tarter, JC, Backus, PR, Mancinelli, RL, Aurnou, JM, Backman, DE, Basri, GS, Boss, AP, Clarke, A, Deming, D, Doyle, LR, Feigelson, ED, Freund, F, Grinspoon, DH, Haberle, RM, Hauck, SAII, Heath, MJ, Henry, TJ, Hollingsworth, JL, Joshi, MM, Kilston, S, Liu, MC, Meikle, E, Reid, IN, Rothschild, LJ, Scalo, J, Segura, A, Tang, CM, Tiedje, JM, Turnbull, MC, Walkowicz, LM, Weber, AL and Young, RE (2007) A reappraisal of the habitability of planets around M dwarf stars. Astrobiology 7, 30.Google Scholar
Thompson, SE, Coughlin, JL, Hoffman, K, Mullally, F, Christiansen, JL, Burke, CJ, Bryson, S, Batalha, N, Haas, MR, Catanzarite, J, Rowe, JF, Barentsen, G, Caldwell, DA, Clarke, BD, Jenkins, JM, Li, J, Latham, DW, Lissauer, JJ, Mathur, S, Morris, RL, Seader, SE, Smith, JC, Klaus, TC, Twicken, JD, Wohler, B, Akeson, R, Ciardi, DR, Cochran, WD, Barclay, T, Campbell, JR, Chaplin, WJ, Charbonneau, D, Henze, CE, Howell, SB, Huber, D, Prsa, A, Ramirez, SV, Morton, TD, Christensen-Dalsgaard, J, Dotson, JL, Doyle, L, Dunham, EW, Dupree, AK, Ford, EB, Geary, JC, Girouard, FR, Isaacson, H, Kjeldsen, H, Steffen, JH, Quintana, EV, Ragozzine, D, Shporer, A, Silva, Aguirre V, Still, M, Tenenbaum, P, Welsh, WF, Wolfgang, A, Zamudio, KA, Koch, DG and Borucki, WJ (2017) Planetary candidates observed by Kepler. VIII. A fully automated catalog with measured completeness and reliability based on data release 25. Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series submitted; arXiv:1710.06758.Google Scholar
Underwood, DR, Jones, BW and Sleep, PN (2003) The evolution of habitable zones during stellar lifetimes and its implications on the search for extraterrestrial life. International Journal of Astrobiology 2, 289.Google Scholar
von Bloh, W, Bounama, C, Cuntz, M and Franck, S (2007) The habitability of super-Earths in Gliese 581. Astronomy and Astrophysics 476, 1365.Google Scholar
Wang, J, Fischer, DA, Xie, J-W and Ciardi, DR (2014) Influence of stellar multiplicity on planet formation. II. Planets are less common in multiple-star systems with separations smaller than 1500 AU. Astrophysical Journal 791, 111.Google Scholar
Wang, Zh and Cuntz, M (2017) Fitting formulae and constraints for the existence of S-type and P-type habitable zones in binary systems. Astronomical Journal 154, 157.Google Scholar
Welsh, WF, Orosz, JA, Short, DR, Cochran, WD, Endl, M, Brugamyer, E, Haghighipour, N, Buchhave, LA, Doyle, LR, Fabrycky, DC, Hinse, TC, Kane, SR, Kostov, V, Mazeh, T, Mills, SM, Müller, TWA, Quarles, B, Quinn, SN, Ragozzine, D, Shporer, Avi, Steffen, JH, Tal-Or, L, Torres, G, Windmiller, G and Borucki, WJ (2015) Kepler 453b – the 10th Kepler transiting circumbinary planet. Astrophysical Journal 809, 26.Google Scholar
Williams, DM and Pollard, D (2002) Earth-like worlds on eccentric orbits: excursions beyond the habitable zone. International Journal of Astrobiology 1, 61.Google Scholar
Wordsworth, R, Forget, F, Millour, E, Head, JW, Madeleine, J-B and Charnay, B (2013) Global modelling of the early martian climate under a denser CO2 atmosphere: water cycle and ice evolution. Icarus 222, 1.Google Scholar
Zuluaga, JI, Mason, PA and Cuartas-Restrepo, PA (2016) Constraining the radiation and plasma environment of the Kepler circumbinary habitable-zone planets. Astrophysical Journal 818, 160.Google Scholar