Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T01:32:09.533Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Molecular Opacities: Application to the Giant Planets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2016

T. Guillot ,
D. Gautier  and
G. Chabrier
T. Guillot
Affiliation:
Observatotre de la Côte d’Azur, BP229, 06304 Nice Cedex 4.France
D. Gautier
Affiliation:
Observatotre de Paris, 5 pl J.Janssen, 92195 Meudon Cedex.France
G. Chabrier
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Physique, E.N.S. Lyon, 69364 Lyon Cedex 07.France

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Present available interior models of giant planets assume that the internal transport of energy is entirely convective and, accordingly, rule out any possibility of radiative transport. New opacity calculations at temperatures and densities occurring within the giant planets, taking into account H2-H2 and H2-He collision-induced absorption as well as infrared and visible absorption due to hydrogen, water, methane and ammonia are presented. These opacities are not high enough to exclude the presence of a. radiative zone in the molecular H2 envelope of Jupiter, Saturn and Uranus.

Type
Posters
Information
International Astronomical Union Colloquium , Volume 147: The Equation of State in Astrophysics , 1994 , pp. 576 - 580
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

References

Barshay, S.S., Lewis, J.S., Icarus 33, 593–611, (1978).Google Scholar
Bell, K.L., J. Phys. B 13, 1859–1865, (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birnbaum, G., J. Quant. Sptctrosc. Radiat. Transfer 21, 597–607, (1979).Google Scholar
Borysow, A., Frommhold, L., Astrophys. J. 341, 549–555, (1989).Google Scholar
Borysow, A., Frommhold, L., Astrophys. J. 348, L41–L43, (1990).Google Scholar
Chabrier, G., Saumon, D., Hubbard, W.B., Limine, J.I., Astrophys. J. 391, 817–826, (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalgarno, A., Williams, D.A., Proc. Phys. Soc. 85, 585–589, (1965).Google Scholar
Gautier, D., Owen, T., In Origin and Evolution of Planetary and Satellite Atmospheres (eds. Atreya, S.K., Pollack, J.B., and Matthews, M.S.), University of Arizona Press, Tucson, pp. 487–512, (1989).Google Scholar
Hubbard, W.B., Astrophys. J. 152, 745–753, (1968).Google Scholar
Hubbard, W.B., Marley, M.S., Icarus 78, 102–118, (1989).Google Scholar
Husson, N., Bonnet, B., Scott, N.A., Chedin, A., J. Quant. Sptctrosc. Radiat. Transfer 48, 509–518, (1992).Google Scholar
John, T.L., Astron. Astrophys. 193, 189–192, (1988).Google Scholar
Kurucz, R.L., Smithsonian Obs. Spec. Rep. 309, 1–291, (1970).Google Scholar
Lenzuni, P., Chernoff, D.F., Salpeter, E.E., Astrophys. J. Suppl. 76, 759–801, (1991).Google Scholar
Lenzuni, P., Saumon, D., Rev. Mex. Astron. Astrofis. 23, 223–230, (1992).Google Scholar
Pearl, J.C., Conrath, B.J., J. Geophys. Res. Suppl. 96, 18921–18930, (1991)Google Scholar
Stevenson, D.J., Ph.D. thesis, Cornell University, (1976).Google Scholar