Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-495rp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-20T15:38:35.389Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis and prevention of hepatobiliary surgical site infections

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2018

Conor M. Stack*
Affiliation:
Division of Infection Control/Hospital Epidemiology, Silverman Institute of Health Care Quality & Safety, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
Howard S. Gold
Affiliation:
Division of Infection Control/Hospital Epidemiology, Silverman Institute of Health Care Quality & Safety, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
Sharon B. Wright
Affiliation:
Division of Infection Control/Hospital Epidemiology, Silverman Institute of Health Care Quality & Safety, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
Linda M. Baldini
Affiliation:
Division of Infection Control/Hospital Epidemiology, Silverman Institute of Health Care Quality & Safety, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
Graham M. Snyder
Affiliation:
Division of Infection Control/Hospital Epidemiology, Silverman Institute of Health Care Quality & Safety, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
*
Author for correspondence: Conor Stack, MD, Mailstop SL-435, 330 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA 02115. E-mail: cstack1@bidmc.harvard.edu

Abstract

Objective

To characterize the microbiology of hepatobiliary surgical site infections (SSIs) and to explore the relationship between specific antimicrobial prophylaxis regimens and the development of SSIs.

Design

Retrospective matched case-control study comparing patient, procedure, and antimicrobial prophylaxis characteristics among patients undergoing a hepatobiliary surgical procedure with and without an SSI.

Setting

A tertiary referral acute-care facility.

Methods

Patients undergoing procedures defined as “BILI” (bile duct, liver, or pancreas surgery) using National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) definitions, excluding those undergoing concomitant liver transplantation, from January 2013 through June 2016 were included in the study population. The SSIs were identified through routine infection control surveillance using NHSN definitions. All patients who developed an SSI were considered cases. Controls were selected randomly matched 2:1 with cases based on fiscal quarter of the procedure. Logistic regression modeling was performed to explore variables associated with SSI, including antimicrobial prophylaxis received.

Results

Among 975 procedures, 80 (8.2%) resulted in an SSI. Most cases involved an organism nonsusceptible to standard prophylaxis regimens, including cefazolin (68.8%), cefazolin plus metronidazole (61.3%), and ampicillin-sulbactam (52.5%). In a multivariate model, antimicrobial coverage against Enterococcus spp (aOR, 0.58; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.17–2.04; P=.40) and against Pseudomonas spp (aOR, 2.40; 95% CI, 0.56–10.29; P=.24) were not protective against the development of an SSI. The presence of a documented β-lactam allergy was significantly associated with the development of an SSI (aOR, 3.54; 95% CI, 1.36–9.19; P=.009).

Conclusions

Although SSIs at the study institution were associated with pathogens nonsusceptible to the most commonly used prophylaxis regimens, broader-spectrum coverage was not associated with a reduction in SSIs.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
© 2018 by The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. All rights reserved. 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Cite this article: Stack C, et al. (2018). Perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis and prevention of hepatobiliary surgical site infections. Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology 2018, 39, 1037–1041. doi: 10.1017/ice.2018.164

PREVIOUS PRESENTATION: Findings from this study were presented at The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America Spring 2017 Conference in St. Louis, Missouri, on March 30, 2017 (poster no. 304).

References

1. Zimlichman, E, Henderson, D, Tamir, O, et al. Health care-associated infections: a meta-analysis of costs and financial impact on the US health care system. JAMA Intern Med 2013;173:20392046.Google Scholar
2. Berenguer, CM, Ochsner, MG Jr, Lord, SA, Senkowski, CK. Improving surgical site infections: using National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data to institute Surgical Care Improvement Project protocols in improving surgical outcomes. J Am Coll Surg 2010;210:737741.Google Scholar
3. Hawn, MT, Vick, CC, Richman, J, et al. Surgical site infection prevention: time to move beyond the surgical care improvement program. Ann Surg 2011;254:494499; discussion 499–501.Google Scholar
4. Saeed, MJ, Dubberke, ER, Fraser, VJ, Olsen, MA. Procedure-specific surgical site infection incidence varies widely within certain National Healthcare Safety Network surgery groups. Am J Infect Control 2015;43:617623.Google Scholar
5. Bratzler, DW, Dellinger, EP, Olsen, KM, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2013;70:195283.Google Scholar
6. Donald, GW, Sunjaya, D, Lu, X, et al. Perioperative antibiotics for surgical site infection in pancreaticoduodenectomy: does the SCIP-approved regimen provide adequate coverage? Surgery 2013;154:190196.Google Scholar
7. Surgical site infection (SSI) event. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website. http://www.cdc.gov/nhsn/pdfs/pscmanual/9pscssicurrent.pdf. Published 2017. Accessed November 21, 2017.Google Scholar
8. CLSI. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. 26th ed. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2016.Google Scholar
9. Fong, ZV, McMillan, MT, Marchegiani, G, et al. Discordance between perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis and wound infection cultures in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. JAMA Surg 2016;151:432439.Google Scholar
10. Gavazzi, F, Ridolfi, C, Capretti, G, et al. Role of preoperative biliary stents, bile contamination and antibiotic prophylaxis in surgical site infections after pancreaticoduodenectomy. BMC Gastroenterol 2016;16:43.Google Scholar
11. Morikane, K. Epidemiology and risk factors associated with surgical site infection after different types of hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery. Surg Today 2017;47:12081214.Google Scholar
12. Charneski, L, Deshpande, G, Smith, SW. Impact of an antimicrobial allergy label in the medical record on clinical outcomes in hospitalized patients. Pharmacotherapy 2011;31:742747.Google Scholar
13. Macy, E, Contreras, R. Health care use and serious infection prevalence associated with penicillin “allergy” in hospitalized patients: a cohort study. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2014;133:790796.Google Scholar
14. Trinh, JV, Chen, LF, Sexton, DJ, Anderson, DJ. Risk factors for gram-negative bacterial surgical site infection: do allergies to antibiotics increase risk? Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2009;30:440446.Google Scholar
15. Tan, TL, Springer, BD, Ruder, JA, Ruffolo, MR, Chen, AF. Is vancomycin-only prophylaxis for patients with penicillin allergy associated with increased risk of infection after arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2016;474:16011606.Google Scholar
16. Blumenthal, KG, Ryan, EE, Li, Y, Lee, H, Kuhlen, JL, Shenoy, ES. The impact of a reported penicillin allergy on surgical site infection risk. Clin Infect Dis 2018;66:329336.Google Scholar
17. Mu, Y, Edwards, JR, Horan, TC, Berrios-Torres, SI, Fridkin, SK. Improving risk-adjusted measures of surgical site infection for the national healthcare safety network. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2011;32:970986.Google Scholar
18. Bull, AL, Worth, LJ, Spelman, T, Richards, MJ. Antibiotic prescribing practices for prevention of surgical site infections in Australia: increased uptake of national guidelines after surveillance and reporting and impact on infection rates. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 2017;18:834840.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Stack et al. supplementary material

Table S1

Download Stack et al. supplementary material(File)
File 14.9 KB