Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T15:31:15.513Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Outbreak of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Surgical Site Infections after Arthroscopic Procedures: Texas, 2009

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Pritish K. Tosh*
Affiliation:
Epidemic Intelligence Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
Maureen Disbot
Affiliation:
The Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas
Jonathan M. Duffy
Affiliation:
Epidemic Intelligence Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
Marc L. Boom
Affiliation:
The Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas
Gary Heseltine
Affiliation:
Texas Department of State Health Services, Austin, Texas
Arjun Srinivasan
Affiliation:
Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
Carolyn V. Gould
Affiliation:
Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
Sandra I. Berríos-Torres
Affiliation:
Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
*
Mayo Clinic Division of Infectious Diseases, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905 (tosh.pritish@mayo.edu)

Abstract

Setting.

Seven organ/space surgical site infections (SSIs) that occurred after arthroscopic procedures and were due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa of indistinguishable pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) patterns occurred at hospital X in Texas from April 22, 2009, through May 7, 2009.

Objective.

To determine the source of the outbreak and prevent future infections.

Design.

Infection control observations and a case-control study.

Methods.

Laboratory records were reviewed for case finding. A case-control study was conducted. A case patient was defined as someone who underwent knee or shoulder arthroscopy at hospital X during the outbreak period and subsequently developed organ/space SSI due toP. aeruginosa. Cultures of environmental and surgical equipment samples were performed, and selected isolates were analyzed by PFGE. Surgical instrument reprocessing practices were reviewed, and surgical instrument lumens were inspected with a borescope after reprocessing to assess cleanliness.

Results.

The case-control study did not identify any significant patient-related or operator-related risk factors. P. aeruginosa grew from 62 of 388 environmental samples. An isolate from the gross decontamination sink had a PFGE pattern that was indistinguishable from that of the case patient isolates. All surgical instrument cultures showed no growth. Endoscopic evaluation of reprocessed arthroscopic equipment revealed retained tissue in the lumen of both the inflow/outflow cannulae and arthroscopic shaver handpiece. No additional cases occurred after changes in instrument reprocessing protocols were implemented. After this outbreak, the US Food and Drug Administration released a safety alert about the concern regarding retained tissue within arthroscopic shavers.

Conclusions.

These SSIs were likely related to surgical instrument contamination with P. aeruginosa during instrument reprocessing. Retained tissue in inflow/outflow cannulae and shaver handpieces could have allowed bacteria to survive sterilization procedures.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

a

Pritish K. Tosh, MD, Mayo Clinic Division of Infectious Diseases

The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

References

1. Babcock, HM, Carroll, C, Matava, M, L'Ecuyer, P, Fraser, V. Surgical site infections after arthroscopy: outbreak investigation and case control study. Arthroscopy. 2003;19:172181.Google Scholar
2. Armstrong, RW, Bolding, F, Joseph, R. Septic arthritis following arthroscopy: clinical syndromes and analysis of risk factors. Arthroscopy. 1992;8:213223.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Armstrong, RW, Bolding, F. Septic arthritis after arthroscopy: the contributing roles of intraarticular steroids and environmental factors. Am J Infect Control 1994;22:1618.Google Scholar
4. D'Angelo, GL, Ogilvie-Harris, DJ. Septic arthritis following arthroscopy, with cost/benefit analysis of antibiotic prophylaxis. Arthroscopy. 1988;4:1014.Google Scholar
5. Ajemian, E, Andrews, L, Hryb, K, Klimek, JJ. Hospital-acquired infections after arthroscopic knee surgery: a probable environmental source. Am J Infect Control 1987;15:159162.Google Scholar
6. Blevins, FT, Salgado, J, Wascher, DC, Koster, F. Septic arthritis following arthroscopic meniscus repair: a cluster of three cases. Arthroscopy. 1999;15:3540.Google Scholar
7. Lopansri, B, Taylor, C, Anderson, V, Pombo, D, Burke, J. Protracted outbreak of postarthroscopy infections associated with flash sterilization of instruments. In: Program and abstracts of the Fifth Decennial International Conference on Healthcare-Associated Infections. Atlanta: Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America, 2010. Abstract 400.Google Scholar
8. Parada, SA, Grassbaugh, JA, DeVine, JG, Arrington, ED. Instrumentation-specific infection after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Sports Health 2009;1:481485.Google Scholar
9. Viola, R, Marzano, N, Vianello, R. An unusual epidemic of Staphylococcus-negative infections involving anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with salvage of the graft and function. Arthroscopy. 2000;16:173177.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10. Johnson, LL, Shneider, DA, Austin, MD, Goodman, FG, Bullock, JM, DeBruin, JA. Two per cent glutaraldehyde: a disinfectant in arthroscopy and arthroscopic surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1982;64:237239.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11. McAllister, DR, Parker, RD, Cooper, AE, Recht, MP, Abate, J. Outcomes of postoperative septic arthritis after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 1999;27:562570.Google Scholar
12. Sherman, OH, Fox, JM, Snyder, SJ, et al. Arthroscopy— “no-problem surgery”: an analysis of complications in two thousand six hundred and forty cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1986;68:256265.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13. Rutala, WA, Weber, DJ; Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Guideline for Disinfection and Sterilization in Healthcare Facilities, 2008. http://www.cdc.gov/hicpac/Disinfection_Sterilization/toc.html.Google Scholar
14. US Food and Drug Administration. Arthroscopic Shavers: Ongoing Safety Review. http://www.fda.gov/Safety/MedWatch/Safetylnformation/SafetyAlertsforHumanMedicalProducts/ucml70730.htm. July 7, 2009. Accessed December 3, 2010.Google Scholar
15. US Food and Drug Administration. Ongoing Safety Review of Arthroscopic Shavers.http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/AlertsandNotices/ucml70639.htm. 2009. Accessed December 3, 2010.Google Scholar