Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T05:42:54.688Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Genodiversity of Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolates in Relation to Antimicrobial Usage Density and Resistance Rates in Intensive Care Units

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Daniel Jonas ,
Elisabeth Meyer ,
Frank Schwab  and
Hajo Grundmann
Daniel Jonas*
Affiliation:
Department of Environmental Health Sciences, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
Elisabeth Meyer
Affiliation:
Department of Environmental Health Sciences, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
Frank Schwab
Affiliation:
Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Charité-University Hospital and National Reference Centre for Surveillance of Nosocomial Infections, Berlin, Germany
Hajo Grundmann
Affiliation:
Rijksinstituut voor Volksgezondheid en Mileu, European Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance System, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands
*
Department of Environmental Health Sciences, University Medical Center Freiburg, Breisacher Straße 115b, 79106 Freiburg, Germany (daniel.jonas@uniklinik-freiburg.de)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective.

To evaluate the assumption that resistance rates in intensive care units (ICUs) are markedly influenced by cross-transmission events in addition to high rates of antimicrobial usage.

Methods.

This was a prospective ICU- and laboratory-based surveillance study involving 35 German ICUs from 1999 through 2004. A total of 585 ciprofloxacin- or imipenem-resistant isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa were investigated together with resistance rate and unit-based antimicrobial usage density. Antimicrobial use was reported in terms of defined daily doses per 1,000 patient-days. All the strains were assigned to ICU-based genotypes. Genodiversity was calculated as the numbers of indistinguishable ICU-based genotypes found per isolates tested. Reduced ICU-based genodiversity was taken as an indirect measure of frequently occurring cross-transmission events.

Results.

The genodiversity of ciprofloxacin- and imipenem-resistant P. aeruginosa isolates was significantly lower (P ≤ .05, by Fisher exact test) in ICUs with high resistance rate and low antimicrobial usage density (genodiversity, 0.50 and 0.50, respectively) than in ICUs that featured low resistance rate in the presence of high antimicrobial usage density (genodiversity, 0.90 and 0.95, respectively). In ICUs with low genodiversity, there was a greater rise in resistance rate with increasing antimicrobial usage density, compared with that in ICUs with high diversity.

Conclusions.

This study on resistant P. aeruginosa isolates supports the assumption that high resistance rate in the presence of low antimicrobial usage density results from more-frequent cross-transmission events. A greater rise in resistance rate with increasing antimicrobial usage density in ICUs with low genodiversity indicates that resistance rate in ICUs might be markedly determined by cross-transmission events other than antimicrobial usage.

Type
Original Article
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 29 , Issue 4 , April 2008 , pp. 350 - 357
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Monnet, DL, Archibald, LK, Phillips, L, Tenover, FC, McGowan, JE Jr, Gaynes, RP. Antimicrobial use and resistance in eight US hospitals: complexities of analysis and modeling. Intensive Care Antimicrobial Resistance Epidemiology Project and National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System Hospitals. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1998;19:388–394.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Meyer, E, Jonas, D, Schwab, F, Rueden, H, Gastmeier, P, Daschner, FD. Design of a surveillance system of antibiotic use and bacterial resistance in German intensive care units (SARI). Infection 2003;31:208–215.Google Scholar
3.Fridkin, SK, Steward, CD, Edwards, JR, et al.Surveillance of antimicrobial use and antimicrobial resistance in United States hospitals: project ICARE phase 2. Project Intensive Care Antimicrobial Resistance Epidemiology (ICARE) hospitals. Clin Infect Dis 1999;29:245–252.Google Scholar
4.CDC NNIS System. National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) System Report, Data Summary from January 1992 to June 2001, issued August 2001. Am J Infect Control 2001;29:404–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Meyer, E, Schwab, F, Jonas, D, Rueden, H, Gastmeier, P, Daschner, FD. Surveillance of antimicrobial use and antimicrobial resistance in intensive care units (SARI). 1. Antimicrobial use in German intensive care units. Intensive Care Med 2004;30:1089–1096.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Gastmeier, P, Geifers, C, Sohr, D, Dettenkofer, M, Daschner, F, Ruden, H. Five years working with the German nosocomial infection surveillance system (Krankenhaus Infektions Surveillance System). Am) Infect Control 2003;31:316–321.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Geffers, C, Koch, J, Sohr, D, et al.Establishment of a national database for ICU-associated infections. First results from the “Krankenhaus-Infections-Surveillance-System” (KISS) [in German]. Anaesthesist 2000;49:732–737.Google Scholar
8.National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing: NCCLS approved standard. Wayne, PA: NCCLS, 1999:M100–S9.Google Scholar
9.DIN. DIN 58940-4 medical microbiology—methods for determination of susceptibility of pathogens (except mycobacteria) to antimicrobial agents. Part 4. Evaluation classes of the minimum inhibitory concentration. Berlin: Beuth Verlag, 1998.Google Scholar
10.Speijer, H, Savelkoul, PH, Bonten, MJ, Stobberingh, EE, Tjhie, JH. Application of different genotyping methods for Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a setting of endemicity in an intensive care unit. J Clin Microbiol 1999;37:3654–3661.Google Scholar
11.Jonas, D, Spitzmuller, B, Weist, K, Rueden, H, Daschner, FD. Comparison of PCR-based methods for typing Escherichia coli. Clin Microbiol Infect 2003;9:823–831.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12.Livermore, DM. Multiple mechanisms of antimicrobial resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: our worst nightmare? Clin Infect Dis 2002;34:634–640.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13.Robicsek, A, Jacoby, GA, Hooper, DC. The worldwide emergence of plas-mid-mediated quinolone resistance. Lancet Infect Dis 2006;6:629–640.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14.Walsh, TR, Toleman, MA, Poirel, L, Nordmann, P. Metallo-β-lactamases: the quiet before the storm? Clin Microbiol Rev 2005;18:306–325.Google Scholar
15.Homan, WL, Tribe, D, Poznanski, S, et al.Multilocus sequence typing scheme for Enterococcus faecium. J Clin Microbiol 2002;40:1963–1971.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16.Enright, MC, Robinson, DA, Rändle, G, Feil, EJ, Grundmann, H, Spratt, BG. The evolutionary history of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002;99:7687–7692.Google Scholar
17.Curran, B, Jonas, D, Grundmann, H, Pitt, T, Dowson, CG. Development of a multilocus sequence typing scheme for the opportunistic pathogen Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Clin Microbiol 2004;42:5644–5649.Google Scholar
18.Monnet, DL. Toward multinational antimicrobial resistance surveillance systems in Europe. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2000;15:91–101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19.Lipsitch, M, Samore, MH. Antimicrobial use and antimicrobial resistance: a population perspective. Emerg Infect Dis 2002;8:347–354.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20.Martinez, JL, Baquero, F. Interactions among strategies associated with bacterial infection: pathogenicity, epidemicity, and antibiotic resistance. Clin Microbiol Rev 2002;15:647–679.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21.Polk, RE, Johnson, CK, McClish, D, Wenzel, RP, Edmond, MB. Predicting hospital rates of fluoroquinolone-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa from fluoroquinolone use in US hospitals and their surrounding communities. Clin Infect Dis 2004;39:497–503.Google Scholar
22.Simpson, EH. Measurement of diversity. Nature 1949;163:688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar