Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wpx84 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-17T17:31:49.340Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Evaluating a Decade of Exposures to Blood and Body Fluids in an Inner-City Teaching Hospital

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Amy M. Treakle
Affiliation:
Infectious Diseases and Infection Control, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Washington, DC Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, George Washington University, Washington, DC
Maureen Schultz
Affiliation:
Infectious Diseases and Infection Control, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Washington, DC
George P. Giannakos
Affiliation:
Occupational Health, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Washington, DC
Patrick C. Joyce
Affiliation:
Occupational Health, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Washington, DC
Fred M. Gordin*
Affiliation:
Infectious Diseases and Infection Control, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Washington, DC Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, George Washington University, Washington, DC
*
50 Irving Street NW, Washington, DC 20422 (fred.gordin@va.gov)

Abstract

Objective.

To analyze a decade of hospital staff and student exposures to blood and body fluids (BBF) and to identify risk factors relevant to prevention strategies.

Design.

Retrospective review of a 1999–2008 data set of BBF exposures. The data, maintained by occupational health staff, detailed the type of exposure, the setting in which the exposure occurred, and the occupational group of the BBF-exposed personnel.

Setting.

Washington DC Veterans Affairs Medical Center (VA-DC), an inner-city tertiary care hospital.

Participants.

All healthcare workers and staff at the VA-DC.

Methods.

Review of database.

Results.

A review of 10 years of data revealed 564 occupational exposures to BBF, of which 66% were caused by needlesticks and 20% were caused by sharp objects. Exposures occurred most often in the acute care setting (which accounted for 39% of exposures) and the operating room (which accounted for 22%). There was a mean of 4.9 exposures per 10,000 acute care patient-days, 0.5 exposures per 10,000 long-term care patient-days, and 0.35 exposures per 10,000 outpatient visits. Housestaff accounted for the highest number of all exposures (196 [35%]). There were, on average, 15.2 exposures per 100 housestaff full-time equivalents. An average of only 1 exposure per year occurred in the hemodialysis center.

Conclusions.

Occupational exposures to BBF remain common, but rates vary widely by setting and occupational group. Overall rates are steady across a decade, despite the use of various antiexposure devices and provider education programs. Targeting occupational groups and hospital settings that have been shown to have the highest risk rates should become foundational to future preventative strategies.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Chen, LP, Sexton, DJ, Kaye, KS, Anderson, DJ. Patient-days: a better measure of incidence of occupational bloodborne exposures. Am J Infect Control 2009;37:534540.Google Scholar
2.International Healthcare Worker Safety Center 2007 U.S. EPINet blood and body fluid exposure report. Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia, 2008. http://www.healthsystem.virginia.edu/internet/epinet. Accessed April 29, 2010.Google Scholar
3.International Healthcare Worker Safety Center 2007 U.S. EPINet blood needlestick and sharp-object injury report. Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia, 2008. http://www.healthsystem.virginia.edu/internet/epinet. Accessed April 29, 2010.Google Scholar
4.Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion. Surveillance of healthcare personnel with HIV/AIDS, as of December 2002. Atlanta, GA: Center for Disease Control and Prevention, 2003. http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dhqp/bp_hiv_hp_with.html. Accessed June 9, 2010.Google Scholar
5.Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion. Hepatitis B in healthcare settings. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2003. http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dhqp/bp_hepatitisb.html. Accessed June 9, 2010.Google Scholar
6.Prüss-Üstün, A, Rapiti, E, Hutin, Y. Estimation of the global burden of disease attributable to contaminated sharps injuries among health-care workers. Am J Ind Med 2005;48:482490.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Alamgir, H, Cvitkovick, Y, Astrakianakis, G, Yu, S. Needlestick and other potential blood and body fluid exposures among health care workers in British Columbia, Canada. Am J Infect Control 2008;36:1221.Google Scholar
8.Dement, JM, Epling, C, Ostbye, T, Pompeii, LA, Hunt, DL. Blood and body fluid exposure risks among health care workers: results from the Duke Health and Safety Surveillance System. Am J Ind Med 2004;46:637648.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Whitby, RM, McLaws, ML. Hollow-bore needlestick injuries in a tertiary teaching hospital: epidemiology, education and engineering. Med J Austr 2002;17:418422.Google Scholar
10.Trim, JC, Elliot, TSJ. A review of sharps injuries and preventative strategies. J Hosp Infect 2003;53:237242.Google Scholar
11.Trapé-Cardoso, M, Schenck, P. Reducing percutaneous injuries at an academic health center: a 5-year review. Am J Infect Control 2004;32:301305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Makary, MA, Al-Attar, A, Holzmueller, CG, et al.Needlestick injuries among surgeons in training. N Engl J Med 2007;356:26932699.Google Scholar
13.Chen, CJ, Gallagher, R, Gerber, LM, Drusin, LM, Roberts, RB. Medical students' exposure to bloodborne pathogens in the operating room: 15 years later. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2008;29:183185.Google Scholar
14.Sharma, GK, Gilson, MM, Nathan, H, Makary, MM. Needlestick injuries among medical students: incidence and implications. Academic Med 2009;84:18151821.Google Scholar