Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T16:39:39.690Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comparing Quantitative Culture of a Blood Sample Obtained through the Catheter with Differential Time to Positivity in Establishing a Diagnosis of Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Iba Al Wohoush
Affiliation:
Department of Infectious Diseases, Infection Control and Employee Health, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
Javier Cairo
Affiliation:
Department of Infectious Diseases, Infection Control and Employee Health, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
Gopikishan Rangaraj
Affiliation:
Department of Infectious Diseases, Infection Control and Employee Health, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
Bruno Granwehr
Affiliation:
Department of Infectious Diseases, Infection Control and Employee Health, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
Ray Hachem
Affiliation:
Department of Infectious Diseases, Infection Control and Employee Health, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
Issam Raad*
Affiliation:
Department of Infectious Diseases, Infection Control and Employee Health, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
*
Department of Infectious Diseases, Infection Control and Employee Health, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Unit 1460, Houston, TX 77030 (iraad@mdanderson.org)

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Research Briefs
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Raad, I, Hanna, H, Maki, D. Intravascular catheter-related infections: advances in diagnosis, prevention, and management. Lancet Infect Dis 2007;7:645657.Google Scholar
2.Hanna, R, Raad, II. Diagnosis of catheter-related bloodstream infections. Curr Infect Dis Rep 2005;7:413419.Google Scholar
3.Mermel, LA, Allon, M, Bouza, E, et al.Clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of intravascular catheter-related infection [published corrections appear in Clin Infect Dis 2010;50(3):457 and 50(7):1079]. Clin Infect Dis 2009;49:115.Google Scholar
4.Safdar, N, Fine, JP, Maki, DG. Methods for diagnosing intravascular device-related bloodstream infection. Ann Intern Med 2005;142:451466.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Blot, F, Schmidt, E, Nitenberg, G, et al.Earlier positivity of central venous versus peripheral-blood cultures is highly predictive of catheter-related sepsis. J Clin Microbiol 1998;36:105109.Google Scholar
6.Raad, I, Hanna, HA, Alakech, B, Chatzinikolaou, I, Johnson, MM, Tarrand, J. Differential time to positivity: a useful method for diagnosing catheter-related bloodstream infections. Ann Intern Med 2004;140:1825.Google Scholar
7.DeLong, ER, DeLong, DM, Clarke-Pearson, DL. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a non-parametric approach. Biometrics 1988;44:837845.Google Scholar
8.Desjardin, JA, Falagas, ME, Ruthazer, R, et al.Clinical utility of blood cultures drawn from indwelling central venous catheters in hospitalized patients with cancer. Ann Intern Med 1999;131:641647.Google Scholar
9.Flynn, PM, Shenep, JL, Barrett, FF. Differential quantitation with commercial blood culture tube for diagnosis of catheter-related infection. J Clin Microbiol 1988;26:10451046.Google Scholar