Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T08:14:53.961Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comparative antimicrobial use in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and non–COVID-19 inpatients from 2019 to 2020: A multicenter ecological study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 October 2023

Carlos A.Q. Santos*
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
Marion Tseng
Affiliation:
Medical Research Analytics and Informatics Alliance, Chicago, Illinois
Ashley I. Martinez
Affiliation:
Rush Alzheimer’s Disease Center, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois Division of Therapeutics and Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
Shivanjali Shankaran
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
Hayley A. Hodgson
Affiliation:
Department of Pharmacy, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
Faraz S. Ahmad
Affiliation:
Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
Huiyuan Zhang
Affiliation:
Center for Health Equity & Innovation, Cook County Health, Chicago, Illinois
Dawn M. Sievert
Affiliation:
Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
William E. Trick
Affiliation:
Center for Health Equity & Innovation, Cook County Health, Chicago, Illinois Department of Internal Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
*
Author for correspondence: Carlos A. Q. Santos, MD, MPHS, Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, 600 S Paulina St, Suite 143, Chicago, IL 60612. E-mail: Carlos_A_Santos@rush.edu

Abstract

Objective:

We sought to determine whether increased antimicrobial use (AU) at the onset of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic was driven by greater AU in COVID-19 patients only, or whether AU also increased in non–COVID-19 patients.

Design:

In this retrospective observational ecological study from 2019 to 2020, we stratified inpatients by COVID-19 status and determined relative percentage differences in median monthly AU in COVID-19 patients versus non–COVID-19 patients during the COVID-19 period (March–December 2020) and the pre–COVID-19 period (March–December 2019). We also determined relative percentage differences in median monthly AU in non–COVID-19 patients during the COVID-19 period versus the pre–COVID-19 period. Statistical significance was assessed using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests.

Setting:

The study was conducted in 3 acute-care hospitals in Chicago, Illinois.

Patients:

Hospitalized patients.

Results:

Facility-wide AU for broad-spectrum antibacterial agents predominantly used for hospital-onset infections was significantly greater in COVID-19 patients versus non–COVID-19 patients during the COVID-19 period (with relative increases of 73%, 66%, and 91% for hospitals A, B, and C, respectively), and during the pre–COVID-19 period (with relative increases of 52%, 64%, and 66% for hospitals A, B, and C, respectively). In contrast, facility-wide AU for all antibacterial agents was significantly lower in non–COVID-19 patients during the COVID-19 period versus the pre–COVID-19 period (with relative decreases of 8%, 7%, and 8% in hospitals A, B, and C, respectively).

Conclusions:

AU for broad-spectrum antimicrobials was greater in COVID-19 patients compared to non–COVID-19 patients at the onset of the pandemic. AU for all antibacterial agents in non–COVID-19 patients decreased in the COVID-19 period compared to the pre–COVID-19 period.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bhatraju, PK, Ghassemieh, BJ, Nichols, M, et al. COVID-19 in critically ill patients in the Seattle region—case series. N Engl J Med 2020;382:20122022.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Richardson, S, Hirsch, JS, Narasimhan, M, et al. Presenting characteristics, comorbidities, and outcomes among 5700 patients hospitalized with COVID-19 in the New York City area. JAMA 2020;323:20522059.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ho, M, Tadrous, M, Iacono, A, Suda, K, Gomes, T. Outpatient purchasing patterns of hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin in the USA and Canada during the COVID-19 pandemic: an interrupted time-series analysis from 2016 to 2021. J Antimicrob Chemother 2022;78:242251.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oldenburg, CE, Pinsky, BA, Brogdon, J, et al. Effect of oral azithromycin vs placebo on COVID-19 symptoms in outpatients with SARS-CoV-2 infection: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2021;326:490498.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hinks, TSC, Cureton, L, Knight, R, et al. Azithromycin versus standard care in patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 (ATOMIC2): an open-label, randomised trial. Lancet Respir Med 2021;9:11301140.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Consortium, WHOST, Pan, H, Peto, R, et al. Repurposed antiviral drugs for COVID-19— interim WHO solidarity trial results. N Engl J Med 2021;384:497511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawson, TM, Moore, LSP, Castro-Sanchez, E, et al. COVID-19 and the potential long-term impact on antimicrobial resistance. J Antimicrob Chemother 2020;75:16811684.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wimmer, MR, Schulz, LT, Hamel, AG, et al. The impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on the antimicrobial stewardship pharmacist workforce: a multicenter survey. Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol 2022;2:e56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Winders, HR, Bailey, P, Kohn, J, et al. Change in antimicrobial use during COVID-19 pandemic in South Carolina hospitals: a multicenter observational cohort study. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2021;58:106453.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
COVID-19: US impact on antimicrobial resistance, special report. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website. https://www.cdc.gov/drugresistance/pdf/covid19-impact-report-508.pdf. Published 2022. Accessed August 28, 2023.Google Scholar
Vaughn, VM, Gandhi, TN, Petty, LA, et al. Empiric antibacterial therapy and community-onset bacterial coinfection in patients hospitalized with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): a multihospital cohort study. Clin Infect Dis 2021;72:e533e541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langford, BJ, So, M, Raybardhan, S, et al. Bacterial coinfection and secondary infection in patients with COVID-19: a living rapid review and meta-analysis. Clin Microbiol Infect 2020;26:16221629.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rawson, TM, Moore, LSP, Zhu, N, et al. Bacterial and fungal coinfection in individuals with coronavirus: a rapid review to support COVID-19 antimicrobial prescribing. Clin Infect Dis 2020;71:24592468.Google ScholarPubMed
Garcia-Vidal, C, Sanjuan, G, Moreno-Garcia, E, et al. Incidence of coinfections and superinfections in hospitalized patients with COVID-19: a retrospective cohort study. Clin Microbiol Infect 2021;27:8388.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tamma, PD, Avdic, E, Li, DX, Dzintars, K, Cosgrove, SE. Association of adverse events with antibiotic use in hospitalized patients. JAMA Intern Med 2017;177:13081315.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Antimicrobial use and resistance (AUR) module. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website. https://www.cdc.gov/nhsn/psc/aur/index.html. Accessed August 28, 2023.Google Scholar
Kho, AN, Hynes, DM, Goel, S, et al. CAPriCORN: Chicago-area patient-centered outcomes research network. JAMIA 2014;21:607611.Google ScholarPubMed
Patel, MT, Santos, C, Price, R, et al. Data Model for Initiatives to Monitor Exposure to Antimicrobials (DataMIME). Online J Public Health Informat 2018;10:e35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qualls, LG, Phillips, TA, Hammill, BG, et al. Evaluating foundational data quality in the national Patient-Centered Clinical Research Network (PCORnet(R)). Egems 2018;6:3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antimicrobial use and resistance option tool kits. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality website. https://www.ahrq.gov/antibiotic-use/index.html. Accessed Auguest 28, 2023.Google Scholar
Creel-Bulos, C, Hockstein, M, Amin, N, Melhem, S, Truong, A, Sharifpour, M. Acute cor pulmonale in critically ill patients with COVID-19. N Engl J Med 2020;382:e70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bilaloglu, S, Aphinyanaphongs, Y, Jones, S, Iturrate, E, Hochman, J, Berger, JS. Thrombosis in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 in a New York City health system. JAMA 2020;324:799801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godoy, LC, Goligher, EC, Lawler, PR, Slutsky, AS, Zarychanski, R. Anticipating and managing coagulopathy and thrombotic manifestations of severe COVID-19. CMAJ. 2020;192:E1156E1161.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Santos, CAQ, Martinez, AI, Won, SY, et al. Computing antimicrobial use/antimicrobial resistance ratios: a novel way to assess inpatient antimicrobial utilization using current National Healthcare Safety Network metrics. Transplant Infect Dis 2022;24:e13924.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hanson, KE, Caliendo, AM, Arias, CA, et al. The Infectious Diseases Society of America guidelines on the diagnosis of COVID-19: molecular diagnostic testing. Clin Infect Dis 2021;ciab048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avezum, A, Oliveira, GBF, Oliveira, H, et al. Hydroxychloroquine versus placebo in the treatment of nonhospitalised patients with COVID-19 (COPE - Coalition V): a double-blind, multicentre, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet Reg Health Am 2022;11:100243.Google Scholar
Skipper, CP, Pastick, KA, Engen, NW, et al. Hydroxychloroquine in nonhospitalized adults with early COVID-19: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 2020;173:623631.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schwartz, IS, Boulware, DR, Lee, TC. Hydroxychloroquine for COVID-19: the curtains close on a comedy of errors. Lancet Reg Health Am 2022;11:100268.Google Scholar
Barlam, TF, Al Mohajer, M, Al-Tawfiq, JA, et al. SHEA statement on antibiotic stewardship in hospitals during public health emergencies. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2022;43:15411552.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fernandez-Hidalgo, N, Almirante, B, Gavalda, J, et al. Ampicillin plus ceftriaxone is as effective as ampicillin plus gentamicin for treating Enterococcus faecalis infective endocarditis. Clin Infect Dis 2013;56:12611268.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rao, SN, Rhodes, NJ, Lee, BJ, et al. Treatment outcomes with cefazolin versus oxacillin for deep-seated methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infections. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2015;59:52325238.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wo, S, Dubrovskaya, Y, Siegfried, J, Papadopoulos, J, Jen, SP. Clinical outcomes of ceftriaxone vs penicillin G for complicated viridans group streptococci bacteremia. Open Forum Infect Dis 2021;8:ofaa542.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marek, CM, Zurek, KJ, Degenhardt, O, et al. Effect of prospective audit and feedback on inpatient fluoroquinolone use and appropriateness of prescribing. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2020;41:14581460.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baum, A, Schwartz, MD. Admissions to Veterans’ Affairs hospitals for emergency conditions during the COVID-19 pandemic. JAMA 2020;324:9699.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Olsen, SJ, Azziz-Baumgartner, E, Budd, AP, et al. Decreased influenza activity during the COVID-19 pandemic—United States, Australia, Chile, and South Africa, 2020. Am J Transplant 2020;20:36813685.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feise, RJ. Do multiple outcome measures require P value adjustment? BMC Med Res Methodol 2002;2:8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barouch, DH. COVID-19 vaccines—immunity, variants, boosters. N Engl J Med 2022;387:10111020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Santos et al. supplementary material

Tables S1-S3

Download Santos et al. supplementary material(File)
File 61.4 KB