Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vvkck Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T21:39:13.530Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Brief Report Possible Prevention of an Outbreak of Group A Streptococcal Infection by a Prospective Epidemiologic Approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Gerald A. Denys ,
Jane T. Palacas  and
A. Martin Lerner
Gerald A. Denys*
Affiliation:
Departments of Medicine and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Hospital of Detroit, Detroit, Michigan
Jane T. Palacas
Affiliation:
Departments of Medicine and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Hospital of Detroit, Detroit, Michigan
A. Martin Lerner
Affiliation:
Departments of Medicine and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Hospital of Detroit, Detroit, Michigan
*
Department of Medicine, Sinai Hospital of Detroit, Detroit, MI 48235
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

On May 17, 1984, a 67-year-old woman with endometrial carcinoma underwent an uneventful abdominal hysterectomy. Suddenly, 18 hours later she was in septic shock, short of breath, restless and oliguric. The wound appeared intact without erythema. Intraabdominal sepsis was postulated and the patient was given full dosages of intravenous cefotaxime, metronidazole and netilmicin. At 48 hours postoperative, the abdominal wound showed areas of necrosis and the patient died. The wound, peritoneal fluid, urine and blood yielded group A (β-hemolytic streptococci (Streptococcus pyogenes). Shortly before death, intravenous penicillin had been administered. An epidemiologic study was promptly initiated.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 7 , Issue 1 , January 1986 , pp. 30 - 31
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Gray, JDA: Outbreak of streptococcal infection in a maternity unit. Lancet 1956; 1:132–136.Google Scholar
2.McCabe, WR, Abrams, AA: An outbreak of streptococcal puerperal sepsis. N Engl J Med 1965; 272:615–618.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.McIntyre, DM: An epidemic of Streptococcus pyogenes puerperal and postoperative sepsis with an unusual carrier—the anus. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1968; 101:308–313.Google Scholar
4.Ogden, E, Amstey, MS: Puerperal infection due to group A β-hemolytic streptococcus. Obstet Gynecol 1978; 52:53–55.Google ScholarPubMed
5.Dillon, HC: Group A type 12 streptococcal infection in a newborn nursery. Am J Dis Child 1966; 112:177–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Gezon, HM, Schaberg, MJ, Klein, JO: Concurrent epidemics of Staphylococcus aureus and group A streptococcus disease in a newborn nursery-control with penicillin G and hexachlorophene bathing. Pediatrics 1973; 51:383–390.Google Scholar
7.Langewisch, WH: An epidemic of group A type 1 streptococcal infections in newborn infants. Pediatrics 1956; 18:438–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Nelson, JD, Dillon, HC, Howard, JB: A prolonged nursery epidemic associated with newly recognized type of group A streptococcus. J Pediatr 1976; 89:792–796.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Peter, G, Hazard, J: Neonatal group A streptococcal disease.J Pediatr 1975; 87:454–455.Google Scholar
10.Geil, CC, Castle, WK, Mortimer, EA: Group A streptococcal infections in newborn nurseries. Pediatrics 1970; 46:849–854.Google Scholar
11.Mead, PB, Ribble, JC, Dillon, TF: Group A streptococcal puerperal infection. Report of an epidemic. Obstet Gynecol 1968; 32:460–464.Google Scholar
12.Tancer, ML, McManus, JE, Bellotti, G: Group A, type 33, β-hemolytic streptococcal outbreak on a maternity and newborn service. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1969; 103:1028–1033.Google Scholar
13.Wiesenthal, AM: A maternal-neonatal outbreak of infections due to an unusual group A βhemolytic streptococcus. Infect Control 1984; 5:271–274.Google Scholar
14.Gryska, PF, O'Dea, AE: Postoperative streptococcal wound infection. The anatomy of an epidemic. JAMA 1970; 213:1189–1191.Google Scholar
15.McKee, WM, DiCaprio, JM, Roberts, JE Jr, et al: Anal carriage as the probable source of a streptococcal epidemic. Lancet 1966; 2:1007–1009.Google Scholar
16.Richman, DD, Breton, SJ, Goldmann, DA: Scarlet fever and group A streptococcal surgical wound infection traced to an anal carrier. J Pediatr 1977; 90:387–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Schaffner, W, Lefkowitz, LB Jr, Goodman, JS, et al: Hospital outbreak of infections with group A streptococci treated to an asymptomatic anal carrier. N Engl J Med 1969; 280:1224–1225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Stamm, WE, Feeley, JC, Facklam, RR: Wound infections due to group A streptococcus traced to a vaginal carrier. J Infect Dis 1978; 138:287–292.Google Scholar
19.Quinn, RW, Hillman, JW: An epidemic of streptococcal wound infections. Arch Environ Health 1965; 11:28–33.Google Scholar
20.Gilbert, DN: Current status of antibiotic prophylaxis in surgical patients. Bull NY Acad Med 1984; 60(4):340–357.Google Scholar