Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T20:09:10.124Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The authors reply

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Michael H. Kramer ,
Alicia J. Mangram  and
Michele L. Pearson
Michael H. Kramer
Affiliation:
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
Alicia J. Mangram
Affiliation:
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
Michele L. Pearson
Affiliation:
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Letters to the Editor
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 21 , Issue 1 , January 2000 , pp. 6 - 7
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2000

References

1.Hurlbert, RJ, Theodore, N, Drabier, JB, Magwood, AM, Sonntag, VK. A prospective randomized double-blind controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of an analgesic epidural paste following lumbar decompressive surgery. J Neurosurg 1999;90(4 suppl):191–197.Google Scholar
2.Kramer, MH, Mangram, AJ, Pearson, ML, Jarvis, WR. Surgical-site complications with a morphine nerve paste used for postoperative pain control after laminectomy. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1999;20:183–186.Google Scholar
3.Needham, CW. Painless lumbar surgery: morphine nerve paste. Conn Med 1996;60: 141–143.Google Scholar