Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T06:20:16.664Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An Evaluation of Autopsy Review as a Technique for Infection Control: A Procedure of Questionable Value

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Kent Crossley ,
Janice Johnson ,
Rebecca Mudge  and
Laura Crossley
Kent Crossley*
Affiliation:
Department of Internal Medicine, St. Paul-Ramsey Medical Center, St. Paul, Minnesota Section of Hospital Epidemiology, St. Paul-Ramsey Medical Center, St. Paul, Minnesota Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota
Janice Johnson
Affiliation:
Department of Internal Medicine, St. Paul-Ramsey Medical Center, St. Paul, Minnesota Section of Hospital Epidemiology, St. Paul-Ramsey Medical Center, St. Paul, Minnesota Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota
Rebecca Mudge
Affiliation:
Department of Internal Medicine, St. Paul-Ramsey Medical Center, St. Paul, Minnesota Section of Hospital Epidemiology, St. Paul-Ramsey Medical Center, St. Paul, Minnesota Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota
Laura Crossley
Affiliation:
Department of Internal Medicine, St. Paul-Ramsey Medical Center, St. Paul, Minnesota Section of Hospital Epidemiology, St. Paul-Ramsey Medical Center, St. Paul, Minnesota Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota
*
St. Paul-Ramsey Medical Center, 640 Jackson Street, St. Paul, MN 55101
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Review of necropsy reports for evidence of undiagnosed antemortem infection is included by the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Hospitals as an element of an effective hospital infection control program. We reviewed records of 155 patients autopsied at St. Paul-Ramsey Medical Center between January 1, 1980 and March 31, 1981. In 13 patients (8%), there was a discrepancy between documentation of infection during the patient's hospitalization and at autopsy. However, in none of these cases was this information useful in our infection control program. We doubt the effectiveness of necropsy review as a tool for nosocomial infection control.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 4 , Issue 1 , February 1983 , pp. 29 - 30
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Joint Commission on Accreditation of Hospitals: Accreditation Manual for Hospitals, 1981 Edition. Chicago, Joint Commission on Accreditation of Hospitals, 1981.Google Scholar
2.Sandritter, W, Staeudinger, M, Drexler, H, Autopsy and clinical diagnosis. Pathol Res Pract 1980;168:107–114.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Cameron, HM, McGoogan, E, A prospective study of 1152 hospital autopsies. I. Inaccuracies in death certification. J Pathol 1981;133:273–283.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Cameron, HM, McGoogan, E, A Prospective study of 1152 hospital autopsies. II. Analysis of inaccuracies in clinical diagnoses and their significance. J Pathol 1981;133:285–301.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Cameron, HM, McGoogan, E, Watson, H, Necropsy: A yardstick for clinical diagnoses. Br Med J 1980;281:985–988.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed