Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T00:37:03.941Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Reduction of Seasonal Influenza Transmission among Healthcare Workers in an Intensive Care Unit: A 4-Year Intervention Study in Thailand

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Anucha Apisarnthanarak*
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases and Infection Control Unit, Thammasat University Hospital, Pratumthani, Thailand
Timothy M. Uyeki
Affiliation:
Influenza Division, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
Pilaipan Puthavathana
Affiliation:
Division of Virology, Siriraj Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand
Rungrueng Kitphati
Affiliation:
Division of Science, Thai National Institute of Health, Nonthaburi, Thailand
Linda M. Mundy
Affiliation:
LM Mundy, Bryn Mawr, Pennsylvania
*
Division of Infectious Diseases, Thammasat University Hospital, Pratumthani, Thailand12120, (anapisarn@yahoo.com)

Extract

Objective.

To evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of an influenza control bundle to minimize healthcare-associated seasonal influenza transmission among healthcare workers (HCWs) in an intensive care unit (ICU) equipped with central air conditioning.

Methods.

A quasi-experimental study was conducted in a 500-bed tertiary care center in Thailand from July 1, 2005, through June 30, 2009. The medical ICU (MICU) implemented an influenza control bundle including healthcare worker (HCW) education, influenza screening of adult community-acquired pneumonia patients, antiviral treatment of patients and ill HCWs who tested positive for influenza, promotion of influenza vaccination among HCWs, and reinforcement of standard infection control policies. The surgical ICU (SICU) and coronary care unit (CCU) received no intervention.

Results.

The numbers of influenza infections among HCWs during the pre- and postintervention periods were 18 cases in 5,294 HCW-days and 0 cases in 5,336 HCW-days in the MICU (3.4 vs 0 cases per 1,000 HCW-days; P < .001), 19 cases in 4,318 HCW-days and 20 cases in 4,348 HCW-days in the SICU (4.4 vs 4.6 cases per 1,000 HCW-days; P = .80), and 18 cases in 5,000 HCW-days and 18 cases in 5,143 HCW-days in the CCU (3.6 vs 3.5 cases per 1,000 HCW-days; P = .92), respectively. Outbreak-related influenza occurred in 7 MICU HCWs, 6 SICU HCWs, and 4 CCU HCWs before intervention and 0 MICU HCWs, 9 SICU HCWs, and 8 CCU HCWs after intervention. Before and after intervention, 25 (71%) and 35 (100%) of 35 MICU HCWs were vaccinated, respectively (P < .001); HCW vaccination coverage did not change significantly in the SICU (21 [70%] of 30 vs 24 [80%] of 30; P = .89) and CCU (19 [68%] of 28 vs 21 [75%] of 28; P = .83). The estimated costs of US $6,471 per unit for postintervention outbreak investigations exceeded the intervention costs of US $4,969.

Conclusion.

A sustained influenza intervention bundle was associated with clinical and economic benefits to a Thai hospital.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Nicholson, KG, Wood, JM, Zambon, M. Influenza. Lancet 2003;362:17331745.Google Scholar
2.Novel Swine-Origin Influenza A (H1N1) Virus Investigation Team; Da-wood, FS, Jain, S, Finelli, L, et al.Emergence of a novel swine-origin influenza A (H1N1) virus in humans. N Engl J Med 2009;360:26052615.Google Scholar
3.Shinde, V, Bridges, CB, Uyeki, TM, et al.Triple-reassortant swine influenza A (HI) in humans in the United States, 2005-2009. N Engl J Med 2009;360:26162625.Google Scholar
4.Smith, GJ, Bahl, J, Vijaykrishna, D, et al.Dating the emergence of pandemic influenza viruses. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009;106:1170911712.Google Scholar
5.Morens, DM, Taubenberger, JK, Fauci, AS. The persistent legacy of the 1918 influenza virus. N Engl J Med 2009;361:225229.Google Scholar
6.Apisarnthanarak, A, Mundy, LM. Surveillance for influenza A 2009 H1N1 among Thai healthcare workers. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2009;30:12361237.Google Scholar
7. Aide-Memoire: infection control recommendations for avian influenza in health-care facilities. World Health Organization Web site, http://www.who.int/csr/disease/avian_influenza/guidelines/EPR_AMl_E5.pdf. Published April 2008. Accessed 30 April 2008.Google Scholar
8.Apisarnthanarak, A, Warren, DK, Fraser, VJ. Issues relevant to the adoption and modification of hospital infection-control recommendations for avian influenza (H5N1 infection) in developing countries. Clin Infect Dis 2007;45:13381342.Google Scholar
9.Lurie, N. H1N1 influenza, public health preparedness, and health care reform. N Engl J Med 2009;361:843845.Google Scholar
10.Monto, AS. The risk of seasonal and pandemic influenza: prospects for control. Clin Infect Dis 2009;48(suppl 1):S20S25.Google Scholar
11.van den Dool, C, Hak, E, Wallinga, J, van Loon, A, Lammers, J, Bonten, M. Symptoms of influenza virus infection in hospitalized patients. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2008;29:314319.Google Scholar
12.Sax, H, Allegranzi, B, Uçkay, I, Larson, E, Boyce, J, Pittet, D. ‘My five moments for hand hygiene’: a user-centred design approach to understand, train, monitor and report hand hygiene. J Hosp Infect 2007;67:921.Google Scholar
13.Apisarnthanarak, A, Puthavathana, P, Kitphati, R, et al.Avian influenza H5N1 screening of intensive care unit patients with community-acquired pneumonia. Emerg Infect Dis 2006;12:17661769.Google Scholar
14.Poddar, SK. Influenza virus types and subtypes detection by single step single tube multiplex reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and agarose gel electrophoresis. J Virol Methods 2002;99:6370.Google Scholar
15. CDC protocol of real-time RT-PCR for swine influenza A (H1N1). World Health Organization Web site, http://www.wpro.who.int/health_topics/hlnl/tech/tech_laboratory.htm. Accessed August 30, 2010.Google Scholar
16.Apisarnthanarak, A, Puthavathana, P, Kitphati, R, Auewarakul, P, Mundy, LM. Outbreaks of influenza A among nonvaccinated healthcare workers: implications for resource-limited settings. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2008;29:777780.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17.Puzniak, LA, Gillespie, KN, Leet, T, Kollef, M, Mundy, LM. A cost-benefit analysis of gown use in controlling vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus transmission: is it worth the price? Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2004;25:418424.Google Scholar
18.Apisarnthanarak, A, Mundy, LM. Influenza outbreak among health care workers in an avian influenza (H5Nl)-endemic setting. Clin Infect Dis 2006;43:14931494.Google Scholar
19.Cowling, BJ, Chan, KH, Fang, VJ, et al.Facemasks and hand hygiene to prevent influenza transmission in households: a cluster randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 2009;151(7):437446.Google Scholar
20.Luby, SP, Agboatwalla, M, Feikin, DR, et al.Effect of handwashing on child health: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2005;366(9481):225233.Google Scholar
21.Allegranzi, B, Pittet, D. Role of hand hygiene in healthcare-associated infection prevention. J Hosp Infect 2009;73(4):305315.Google Scholar
22.Sng, J, Koh, D, Koh, G. Influenza A (H1N1) infections among healthcare workers: a cause for cautious optimism. Occup Environ Med 2009;66:569570.Google Scholar
23.Fiore, AE, Shay, DK, Broder, K, et al.Prevention and control of seasonal influenza with vaccines: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), 2009. MMWR Recomm Rep 2009;58(RR-8):152.Google Scholar
24.Fiore, AE, Shay, DK, Broder, K, et al.Prevention and control of influenza: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), 2008. MMWR Recomm Rep 2008;58(RR-7):160.Google Scholar
25.Uyeki, TM, Prasad, R, Vukotich, C, et al.Low sensitivity of rapid diagnostic test for influenza. Clin Infect Dis 2009;48:e89e92.Google Scholar