Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-7ccbd9845f-zxw8g Total loading time: 0.25 Render date: 2023-01-27T22:54:40.434Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": false } hasContentIssue true

Impact of Adenosine Triphosphate Detection and Feedback on Hospital Room Cleaning

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 May 2016

Philip W. Smith*
Affiliation:
College of Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska
Elizabeth Beam
Affiliation:
College of Nursing, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska
Harlan Sayles
Affiliation:
College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska
Mark E. Rupp
Affiliation:
College of Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska
R. Jennifer Cavalieri
Affiliation:
College of Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska
Shawn Gibbs
Affiliation:
College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska
Angela Hewlett
Affiliation:
College of Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska
*
College of Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, 985400 Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198 (pwsmith@unmc.edu)

Abstract

Objective.

To assess the effect of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) device measurement of hospital room cleaning and feedback of pooled results to environmental service workers (EVS) to improve cleaning efficacy.

Design.

Nonrandomized controlled trial conducted over 20 months.

Setting.

Three hospitals of varying size.

Participants.

EVS workers, randomly selected on the basis of convenience sample of rooms.

Interventions.

Environmental cleanliness composite scores were combined with layered educational interventions and used to provide feedback to EVS workers on specific hospital units. Trends in cleaning efficacy were observed after the interventions.

Results.

Cleaning efficacy improved significantly with each intervention (P < .01) and decreased during the washout period.

Conclusions.

The ATP detection device combined with educational feedback for EVS workers resulted in significant improvement in cleaning efficacy of the hospital room environment.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Guh, A, Carling, P; Environmental Evaluation Workgroup. Options for evaluating environmental cleaning, http://www.cdc.gov/hai/toolkits/evaluating-environmental-cleaning.html. Updated 2010. Accessed October 1, 2013.Google Scholar
2. Otter, JA, Yezli, S, Salkeld, JA, French, GL. Evidence that contaminated surfaces contribute to the transmission of hospital pathogens and an overview of strategies to address contaminated surfaces in hospital settings. Am J Infect Control 2013;41:S6S11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Huang, SS, Datta, R, Platt, R. Risk of acquiring antibiotic-resistant bacteria from prior room occupants. Arch Intern Med 2006;166:19451951.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. Carling, PC, Parry, MF, Von Beheren, SM; Healthcare Environmental Hygiene Study Group. Identifying opportunities to enhance environmental cleaning in 23 acute care hospitals. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2008;29:17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Boyce, JM, Havill, NL, Lipka, A, Havill, H, Rizvani, R. Variations in hospital daily cleaning practices. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2010;31:99101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Boyce, JM, Havill, NL, Havill, HL, Mangione, E, Dumigan, DG, Moore, BA. Comparison of fluorescent marker systems with 2 quantitative methods of assessing terminal cleaning practices. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2011;32:11871193.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. Smith, P, Sayles, H, Hewlett, AL, Cavalieri, R, Gibbs, S, Rupp, M. A study of three methods for assessment of hospital environmental cleaning. Healthcare Infect 2013;18:8085.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Sherlock, O, O'Connell, N, Creamer, E, Humphreys, H. Is it really clean? an evaluation of the efficacy of four methods for determining hospital cleanliness. J Hosp Infect 2009;72:140146.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9. Carling, PC, Parry, MM, Rupp, ME, et al. Improving cleaning of the environment surrounding patients in 36 acute care hospitals. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2008;29:10351041.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10. Boyce, JM, Havill, NL, Dumigan, DG, Golebiewski, M, Balogun, O, Rizvani, R. Monitoring the effectiveness of hospital cleaning practices by use of an adenosine triphosphate bioluminescence assay. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2009;30:678684.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11. Smith, PW, Gibbs, S, Sayles, H, Hewlett, A, Rupp, ME, Iwen, PC. Observations on hospital room contamination testing. Healthcare Infection 2013;18:1013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Huslage, K, Rutala, WA, Sickbert-Bennett, E, Weber, DJ. A quantitative approach to defining “high-touch” surfaces in hospitals. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2010;31:850853.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13. Horan, TC, Andrus, M, Dudeck, MA. CDC/NHSN surveillance definition of health care-associated infection and criteria for specific types of infections in the acute care setting. Am J Infect Control 2008;36:309332.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14. Dumigan, DG, Boyce, JM, Havill, NL, Golebiewski, M, Balogun, O, Rizvani, R. Who is really caring for your environment of care? developing standardized cleaning procedures and effective monitoring techniques. Am J Infect Control 2010;38:387392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Boyce, JM, Havill, NL, Dumigan, DG, Golbiewski, M, Balogun, O, Rizvani, R. Monitoring the effectiveness of hospital cleaning practices using an ATP bioluminescence assay. Paper presented at: Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America Annual Scientific Meeting; April 5-8, 2008; Orlando, Florida (Poster 276).Google Scholar
16. Matlow, AG, Wray, R, Richardson, SE. Attitudes and beliefs, not just knowledge, influence the effectiveness of environmental cleaning by environmental service workers. Am J Infect Control 2012;40:260262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Rebmann, T, Aureden, K; Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology. Preventing methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus transmission in long-term care facilities: an executive summary of the APIC Elimination Guide. Am J Infect Control 2011;39:235238.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18. Havill, NL. Best practices in disinfection of noncritical surfaces in the health care setting: creating a bundle for success. Am J Infect Control 2013;41:S26S30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. Aziz, A. Can education and training for domestic staff increase awareness of infection control practices and improve cleanliness within hospitals? J Infect Preven 2009;10:171177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. Guerrero, DM, Carling, PC, Jury, LA, Ponnada, S, Nerandzic, MM, Donskey, CJ. Beyond the Hawthorne effect: reduction of Clostridium difficile environmental contamination through active intervention to improve cleaning practices. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2013;34:524526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. Pauli, P. Using games to demonstrate competency. I Nurses Staff Dev 2005;21:272276.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22. Whiteley, GS, Derry, C, Glasbey, T. Reliability testing for portable adenosine triphosphate bioluminometers. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2013;34:538540.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Impact of Adenosine Triphosphate Detection and Feedback on Hospital Room Cleaning
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Impact of Adenosine Triphosphate Detection and Feedback on Hospital Room Cleaning
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Impact of Adenosine Triphosphate Detection and Feedback on Hospital Room Cleaning
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *