Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-99c86f546-5rzhg Total loading time: 0.295 Render date: 2021-12-03T10:34:14.257Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Efficiency of Hand Drying for Removing Bacteria From Washed Hands Comparison of Paper Towel Drying With Warm Air Drying

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 June 2016

Yukiko Yamamoto*
Affiliation:
Department of Basic Nursing Science, College of Nursing Art and Science Hyogo, Akashi, Japan
Kazuhiro Ugai
Affiliation:
Department of Basic Nursing Science, College of Nursing Art and Science Hyogo, Akashi, Japan
Yasuko Takahashi
Affiliation:
College of Nursing and Medical Technology, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
*
Department of Basic Nursing Science, College of Nursing Art and Science Hyogo, 13-71 Kitaoji-cho, Akashi 673-8588, Japanyukiko_yamamoto@cnas.u-hyogo.ac.jp

Abstract

Objective:

To evaluate warm air and paper towel drying for removing bacteria from washed hands.

Methods:

After hands were washed with non-antibacterial soap, they were dried using warm air with and without ultraviolet light, while being rubbed or held stationary, or paper towels. Each method was performed as a randomized trial using 30 hands.

Results:

Log colony-forming units (CFU) on palms and fingers increased significantly when hands were dried with warm air while being rubbed for 15 seconds (P < .001), and many bacteria remained at 30 seconds without ultraviolet light (P < .001). Holding hands stationary while drying significantly decreased log CFU on palms, fingers, and fingertips (P < .01 or < .001). Few CFU were detected on palms and fingers dried with ultraviolet light. Although log CFU of palms and fingers did not decrease after drying with three sheets of paper towel, those of fingertips decreased significantly (P < .001). For palms and fingers, log reductions were greater with warm air drying while holding hands stationary, paper towels, and warm air drying while rubbing hands. For fingertips, the log reduction was often greater with paper towels than with warm air.

Conclusions:

Holding hands stationary and not rubbing them was desirable for removing bacteria. Ultraviolet light reinforced the removal of bacteria during warm air drying. Paper towels were useful for removing bacteria from fingertips but not palms and fingers.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Boyce, JM, Pittet, D. Guideline for hand hygiene in health-care settings: recommendations of the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee and the HICPAC/SHEA/APIC/IDSA Hand Hygiene Task Force. MMWR 2002;51:144.Google Scholar
2.Lowbury, EJL, Lilly, HA, Bull, JP. Disinfection of hands: removal of transient organisms. Br Med J 1964;2:230233.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Ayliffe, GAJ, Babb, JR, Bridges, K, et al.Comparison of two methods for assessing the removal of total organisms and pathogens from the skin. JHyg (Camb) 1975;75:259274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Jarvis, JD, Wynne, CD, Enwright, L, Williams, JD. Handwashing and antiseptic-containing soaps in the hospital. J Clin Pathol 1979;32:732737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Ojajärvi, J. Effectiveness of hand washing and disinfection methods in removing transient bacteria after patient nursing. J Hyg (Camb) 1980; 85:193203.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Maki, DG, Zilz, MA, Alvarado, CJ. Evaluation of the antibacterial efficacy of four agents for handwashing. In: Nelson, JD, Grassi, C, eds. Current Chemotherapy and Infectious Disease. Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology; 1979:10891090.Google Scholar
7.Ayliffe, GAJ, Babb, JR, Davies, JG, Lilly, HA. Hand disinfection: a comparison of various agents in laboratory and ward studies. J Hosp Infect 1988;11:226243.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.Zaragoza, M, Sallés, M, Gomez, J, Bayas, JM, Trilla, A. Handwashing with soap or alcoholic solutions? A randomized clinical trial of its effectiveness. Am J Infect Control 1999;27:258261.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Cardoso, CL, Pereira, HH, Zequim, JC, Guilhermetti, M. Effectiveness of hand-cleansing agents for removing a Acinetobacter baumannii strain from contaminated hands. Am J Infect Control 1999;27:327331.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Rotter, M. Handwashing and hand disinfection. In: Mayhall, CG, ed. Hospital Epidemiology and Infection Control, ed. 2. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 1999:13391355.Google Scholar
11.Winnefeld, M, Richard, MA, Drancourt, M, Grob, JJ. Skin tolerance and effectiveness of two hand decontamination procedures in everyday hospital use. Br J Dermatol 2000;143:546550.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12.Guilhermetti, M, Hernandes, SED, Fukushigue, Y, Garcia, LB, Cardoso, CL. Effectiveness of hand-cleansing agents for removing methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from contaminated hands. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2001;22:105108.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13.Chamberlain, AN, Halablab, MA, Gould, DJ, Miles, RJ. Distribution of bacteria on hands and the effectiveness of brief and thorough decontamination procedures using non-medicated soap. Zbl Bakt 1997;285:565575.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14.Yamamoto, Y, Ugai, K, Takahashi, Y. Effective handwashing with non-medicated soap from the viewpoint of the changes in the number of bacteria on the hands in the handwashing process [in Japanese]. Environmental Infections 2002;17:329334.Google Scholar
15.Miller, ML, Davis, LA, Milanesi, LE. A field study evaluating the effectiveness of different hand soaps and sanitizers. Dairy Food Environ Sanitation 1994;14:155160.Google Scholar
16.Ansari, SA, Springthorpe, VS, Sattar, SA, Tostowaryk, W, Wells, GA. Comparison of cloth, paper, and warm air drying in eliminating viruses and bacteria from washed hands. Am J Infect Control 1991;19:243249.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17.Davis, JG, Blake, JR, White, DJ, Woodall, CM. The types and numbers of bacteria left on hands after normal washing and drying by various common methods. The Medical Officer 1969;31:235238.Google Scholar
18.Gustafson, DR, Vetter, EA, Larson, DR, et al.Effects of 4 hand-drying methods for removing bacteria from washed hands: a randomized trial. Mayo Clin Proc 2000;75:705708.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19.Blackmore, MA. A comparison of hand drying methods. Cater Health 1989;1:189198.Google Scholar
20.Montes, LF, Wilborn, WH. Location of bacterial skin flora. Br J Dermatol 1969;81(suppl 1):2326.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21.Meers, PD, Yeo, GA. Shedding of bacteria and skin squames after handwashing. J Hyg (Camb) 1978;81:99105.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22.Sprunt, K, Redman, W, Leidy, G. Antibacterial effectiveness of routine hand washing. Pediatrics 1973;52:264271.Google ScholarPubMed
34
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Efficiency of Hand Drying for Removing Bacteria From Washed Hands Comparison of Paper Towel Drying With Warm Air Drying
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Efficiency of Hand Drying for Removing Bacteria From Washed Hands Comparison of Paper Towel Drying With Warm Air Drying
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Efficiency of Hand Drying for Removing Bacteria From Washed Hands Comparison of Paper Towel Drying With Warm Air Drying
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *