Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-v5vhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-26T14:32:55.078Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Identifying the best-fit leaders for the pandemic context

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 May 2021

Jeff W. Johnson
Jeff W. Johnson*
Affiliation:
SHL
*
Corresponding author. Email: Jeff.johnson@shl.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 14 , Special Issue 1-2: Special Pandemic Issue , June 2021 , pp. 123 - 125
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Johnson, J. W. (2017, April 27–29). Predicting leader performance from personality: Context is essential. In J. W. Johnson (Chair), Don’t take quotes or personality assessment validities out of context [Symposium]. The Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 32nd Annual Conference, Orlando, FL, United States.Google Scholar
Johnson, J. W. (2018, April 27–29). Improving validity and diversity through context-based leader selection. In A. B. Yost (Chair), Work context effects on personality and leadership: Advancing theory and practice [Symposium]. The Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 33rd Annual Conference, Chicago, IL, United States.Google Scholar
Johnson, J. W. (2019, April 4–6). Development and validation of SHL’s Leader Edge selection and development tool. In K. Sawyer (Chair), SIOP Select: Distinguished professional contribution and M. Scott Myers [Special event]. The Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 34th Annual Conference, National Harbor, MD, United States.Google Scholar
Judge, T. A., & Zapata, C. P. (2015). The person-situation debate revisited: Effect of situation strength and trait activation on the validity of the Big Five personality traits in predicting job performance. Academy of Management Journal, 58, 1149–1179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudolph, C. W., Allan, B., Clark, M., Hertel, G., Hirshi, A., Kunze, F., Shockley, K., Shoss, M., Sonnentag, S., & Zacher, H. (2021). Pandemics: Implications for research and practice in industrial and organizational psychology. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 14(1), 1–35.Google Scholar
SHL (2018). Leader Edge technical manual.Google Scholar
Tett, R. P., & Christiansen, N. D. (2007). Personality tests at the crossroads: A response to Morgeson, Campion, Dipboye, Hollenbeck, Murphy, and Schmitt (2007). Personnel Psychology, 60, 967–993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar