Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-568f69f84b-r4dm2 Total loading time: 0.19 Render date: 2021-09-22T09:48:04.228Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Article contents

Self-Trust, Autonomy, and Self-Esteem

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

Abstract

Self-trust is a necessary condition of personal autonomy and self-respect. Self-trust involves a positive sense of the motivations and competence of the trusted person; a willingness to depend on him or her; and an acceptance of vulnerability. It does not preclude trust in others. A person may be rightly said to have too much self-trust; however core self-trust is essential for functioning as an autonomous human being.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1993 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arnault, Lynne. 1989. The radical future of a classic moral theory. In Gender/body/knowledge. See Jaggar and Bordo 1989.Google Scholar
Austin, J. L. 1962. Sense and sensibilia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Baier, Annette. 1985. What do women want in moral theory? Nous 9: 5355.10.2307/2215117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baier, Annette. 1986. Trust and antitrust. Ethics 96: 231–60.10.1086/292745CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, Judith. 1987. Trust and Rationality. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 68: 113.10.1111/j.1468-0114.1987.tb00280.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benjamin, Martin. 1990. Splitting the difference: Compromise and integrity in ethics and politics. Laurence, Kansas: University of Kansas Press.Google Scholar
Brothers, Doris. 1982. Trust disturbances in rape and incest victims. Ph.D. Diss., Yeshiva University, New York.Google Scholar
Code, Lorraine. 1987. Epistemic responsibility. Hanover, N.H.: University Press of New England.Google Scholar
Code, Lorraine. 1991. What can she know? Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, Tessa. 1989. Working for love. New York: Delacorte Press.Google Scholar
Downie, R. S. and Telfer, Elizabeth. 1969. Respect for persons. London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Gambetta, Diego. 1988. Trust: Making and breaking cooperative relations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Govier, Trudy. 1991. How we trust ourselves and what happens when we don't. Cogito 5: 145153.10.5840/cogito19915339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Govier, Trudy. 1992a. Trust, distrust, and feminist theory. Hypatia 7 (1): 1633.10.1111/j.1527-2001.1992.tb00695.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Govier, Trudy. 1992b. Distrust as a practical problem. Journal of Social Philosophy 23 (1): 5263.10.1111/j.1467-9833.1992.tb00484.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Govier, Trudy. 1992c. Is it a jungle out there? Trust, distrust, and the construction of social reality. Dialogue. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
Govier, Trudy. 1992d. When logic meets politics: Trust, testimony, and rhetorical disadvantage. Informal Logic. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
Govier, Trudy. 1992e. An epistemology of trust. International Journal of Moral and Social Studies. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
Harding, Sandra. 1979. The social function of the empiricists' conception of mind. Metaphilosophy 10: 3847.10.1111/j.1467-9973.1979.tb00063.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hekman, Susan. 1991a. Reconstructing the subject: Feminism, modernism and postmodernism. Hypatia 6 (2): 4463.10.1111/j.1527-2001.1991.tb01392.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hekman, Susan. 1991b. Review of Self, society, and personal choice by Diana T Meyers. Hypatia 6 (2): 222–25.Google Scholar
Hertzberg, Lars. 1988. On the attitude of trust. Inquiry 31: 307–22.10.1080/00201748808602157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, John G., with Rempel, John K. and Zanna, Mark P. 1985. Trust in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 49: 95112.Google Scholar
Jaggar, Alison. 1985. Feminist politics and human nature. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Allanheld.Google Scholar
Jaggar, Alison, and Bordo, Susan R. 1989. Gender/body/knowledge. New Brunswick, NJ and London: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Kymlicka, Will. 1989. Liberalism community and culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas. 1979. Trust and power. Trans. Davies, H., Rafman, J., and Rooney, Kathryn. London: John Wiley and Sons. (Original German edition, 1973.).Google Scholar
Meyers, Diana T. 1989. Self, society, and personal choice. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Michalos, Alex. 1990. The impact of trust on business, international security, and the quality of life. Journal of Business Ethics 9: 619–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nye, Andrea. 1990. Words of power. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1971. A theory of justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rotter, Julian B. 1967. A new scale for the measurement of interpersonal trust. Journal of Personality 335: 651–54.Google Scholar
Rotter, Julian B. 1980. Interpersonal trust, trustworthiness and gullibility. American Psychologist 35:17.10.1037/0003-066X.35.1.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sellerberg, Ann‐Mari. 1982. On modern confidence. Acta Sociologica 25: 3948.10.1177/000169938202500103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snyder, Mark. 1984. When belief creates reality. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 18: 247305.Google Scholar
Steinem, Gloria. 1992. Revolution from within: A book of self‐esteem. Boston: Little Brown.Google Scholar
Thomas, Laurence. 1989. Living morally: A psychology of moral character. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Thomas, Laurence. 1991. Trust, affirmation, and moral character: A critique of Kantian morality. In Identity, character, and morality, eds Owen, Flanagan and Amélie, Oksenberg Rorty. Cambridge, Ma.: Bradford Books.Google Scholar
53
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Self-Trust, Autonomy, and Self-Esteem
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Self-Trust, Autonomy, and Self-Esteem
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Self-Trust, Autonomy, and Self-Esteem
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *