Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T22:37:47.146Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Ecclesial Responsibilities of Theologians, Forty Years after Vatican II

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 March 2013

Norbert Rigali
Affiliation:
University of San Diego

Extract

There was a time when theological discourse occurred generally in either of two modes, as a professor-to-students lecture/dialogue or as a theologian-to-other-theologians scholarly communication of books, journals and professional meetings. This twofold role of teacher and professional colleague defined essentially what a theologian does. Although the theologian's work is still thought of in this way by some, this is no longer an adequate model. Contemporary theologians, to be sure, still bear the responsibilities of professors and professional colleagues, but because of changes in Church and society they now have a new responsibility as well.

The most important change in the Catholic Church effected by the Second Vatican Council was arguably the emergence in recent decades of a new kind of laity, a laity empowered to exercise a more active and participatory role in the life and works of the Church. During the same period, moreover, a well-educated laity has grown up in many countries, including the United States.

These changes in the Catholic laity—the great majority of whom, of course, are lay persons in relation to the theological profession as well—have had direct repercussions on the vocation of theologians. As the catalogues and sales of religious publishing houses readily show, contemporary theological works are being read by many lay persons who are not theologians. With their more active and participatory role in the Church's life and mission, lay persons now experience a vested interest in theology and its development.

Type
Editorial Essays
Copyright
Copyright © The College Theology Society 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Jesus, Symbol of God (Maryknoll, NY: Orbis, 1999).

2 Report of Allen, John L. Jr., “Vatican Denounces Fr. Roger Haight's Book, Bars Him From Teaching,” National Catholic Reporter, February 18, 2005.Google Scholar

3 The notification can be found also at http://www.zenit.org/english/visualizza.phtml?sid=66594 (accessed September 14, 2006).

4 “Statement of the Board of Directors, The Catholic Theological Society of America, With Respect to the Notification Issued by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith concerning the book, Jesus: Symbol of God, by Rev. Roger Haight, S.J. and Prohibiting Fr. Haight from Teaching Catholic Theology.” http://www.jcu.edu/ctsa/haight.html (accessed September 14, 2006).