Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 January 2017
This article explores how education reformers in California pioneered forms of centralized educational governance between 1850 and 1879. Challenging previous scholarship that has attributed the success of this early educational state to reformer John Swett and New England migrants, this article situates the creation of common schools in California within the larger context of American state-building in the nineteenth-century West. While increased state authority over education was a goal for reformers across the nation, this article contends that California's early innovations in centralization reflected a regionally specific response to the dilemmas of governing a recently acquired territory distant from eastern centers of power. The precarious nature of elite attempts to convert California into an American place, reflected in perceived lawlessness, weak governmental authority, and racial anxiety, inspired forms of educational organization commonly associated with Progressive Era responses to industrialization, urbanization, and immigration. The desire to promote nineteenth-century American racial and governmental order in California, this article concludes, powerfully shaped the growth of public education in the state, influencing the organization of schooling in ways that suggest the importance of looking beyond the Northeast to understand the development of public education in the United States.
2 Most histories of the common school movement concentrate their analysis on the Northeast. See Cremin, Lawrence, The American Common School: An Historic Conception (New York: Teachers College Press, 1951); Katz, Michael B., The Irony of Early School Reform: Educational Innovation in Mid-Nineteenth Century Massachusetts (New York: Teachers College Press, 2001); Katz, Michael B., Reconstructing American Education (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1987); Kaestle, Carl, Pillars of the Republic: Common Schools and American Society, 1780–1860 (New York: Hill and Wang, 1983); and Reese, William, America's Public Schools: From the Common School to No Child Left Behind (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2005). For two accounts that challenge the tendency for educational historians to focus exclusively on New England, see Newman, Joseph W., “Antebellum School Reform in the Port Cities of the Deep South,” in Southern Cities, Southern Schools: Public Education in the Urban South , ed. Plank, David N. and Ginsberg, Rick (New York: Greenwood Press, 1990), 17–36; and Tyack, , “The Kingdom of God and the Common School.”Google Scholar
3 In the context of California, several historians invoke this logic by emphasizing the New England origins of the fourth superintendent of instruction in the state and attributing the development of education in California to his New England pedigree. See Cloud, Roy W., Education in California: Leaders, Organizations, and Accomplishments of the First Hundred Years (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1952), 39; Polos, Nicholas C., “A Yankee Patriot: John Swett, the Horace Mann of the Pacific,” History of Education Quarterly 4, no. 1 (March 1964): 17–32; and Starr, Kevin, Americans and the California Dream, 1850–1915 (New York: Oxford University Press, 1973), 87–88. Other histories emphasize the “New England” origins of early school promoters in general. See, for example, Hendrick, Irving G., California Education: A Brief History (San Francisco: Boyd & Fraser, 1980), 6. Both views are problematic, given the presence of numerous reformers from southern states and the opposition of some New England migrants to educational expansion.Google Scholar
4 “The California Experiment,” National Teacher: A Monthly Educational Journal 3, no. 6 (June 1873): 226.
5 Swett, John, “An Outsider's View of It,” clipping from “Some of my Articles as The Pacific Coast Editor of the New England Journal of Education,” carton 2, John Swett Papers MSS C-B 352 (hereafter JSP), Bancroft Library, University of California, Berkeley.
6 Limerick, Patricia Nelson, The Legacy of Conquest: The Unbroken Past of the American West (New York: W. W. Norton, 1987), 236.Google Scholar
7 On the efforts of elites to impose American gender and racial hierarchies onto San Francisco through “cultural frontiers” like restaurants, hotels, boardinghouses, tourist attractions, fairs, and expositions, see Berglund, Barbara, Making San Francisco American: Cultural Frontiers in the Urban West, 1846–1906 (Lawrence: University of Kansas Press, 2007).Google Scholar
9 “The Public Schools and Colored Children,” San Francisco Bulletin, 24 February 1858, 2.
10 On the unique nature of race relations and the ambiguous status of Californios, see Almaguer, Tomás, Racial Fault Lines: The Historical Origins of White Supremacy in California (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1994) and Bottoms, D. Michael, An Aristocracy of Color: Race and Reconstruction in California and the West, 1850–1890 (Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 2013), 82.Google Scholar
11 On perceptions of antebellum California as lawless, see Hansen, Woodrow James, The Search for Authority in California (Oakland, CA: Biobooks, 1960); McGrath, Roger D., “A Violent Birth: Disorder, Crime, and Law Enforcement, 1849–1890,” in Taming the Elephant: Politics, Government, and Law in Pioneer California , ed. Burns, John F. and Orsi, Richard J. (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2003), 27–73; and Mullen, Kevin J., Let Justice Be Done: Crime and Politics in Early San Francisco (Reno: University of Nevada Press, 1989). On connections between California's racial diversity and perceptions of the region as disorderly, see Almaguer, , Racial Fault Lines, and Berglund, Making San Francisco American. On the fluidity of racial and gender hierarchies within the mines, see Susan Lee Johnson, Roaring Camp: The Social World of the California Gold Rush (New York: W. W. Norton, 2000).Google Scholar
12 For accounts of Progressive Era education reforms designed to encourage centralization, see Cremin, Lawrence A., The Transformation of the School: Progressivism in American Education, 1876–1957 (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1961); Katz, Michael, Class, Bureaucracy, and Schools: The Illusion of Educational Change in America (New York: Praeger, 1975); Tyack, David B., The One Best System: A History of American Urban Education (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1974); Bullough, William A., Cities and Schools in the Gilded Age: The Evolution of an Urban Institution (Port Washington, NY: Kennikat Press, 1974); Callahan, Raymond E., Education and the Cult of Efficiency: A Study of the Social Forces That Have Shaped the Administration of Public Schools (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1962); and Steffes, Tracy Lynn, School, Society & State: A New Education to Govern Modern America, 1890–1940 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2012).Google Scholar
13 Hendrick, , California Education, 19.
14 For histories of California education, most of which tend to perpetuate this view, see Carr, William G., John Swett: The Biography of an Educational Pioneer (Santa Ana, CA: Fine Arts Press, 1933); Ferrier, William W., Ninety Years of Education in California, 1846–1936: A Presentation of Educational Movements and Their Outcome in Education Today (Berkeley, CA: Sather Gate Book Shop, 1937); Johnson, Leighton H., Development of the Central State Agency for Public Education in California, 1849–1949 (Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press, 1952); Cloud, , Education in California; and Polos, Nicholas C., John Swett: California's Frontier Schoolmaster (Washington, DC: University Press of America, 1978). Hendrick, , Tyack, , James, , and Benavot, provide more sophisticated accounts that, nonetheless, elevate Swett above his predecessors and tend to dismiss continuities between early superintendents. See Hendrick, , California Education ; Hendrick, Irving G., “From Indifference to Imperative Duty: Educating Children in Early California,” California History 79, no. 2 (July 2000): 226–49; and Tyack, David, James, Thomas, and Benavot, Aaron, Law and the Shaping of Public Education, 1785–1954 (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1987), 87–107. The best histories of education in California have focused on gender and race. See, for example, Wollenberg, Charles M., All Deliberate Speed: Segregation and Exclusion in California Schools, 1855–1975 (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1976); Hendrick, Irving G., The Education of Non-Whites in California, 1849–1970 (San Francisco: R & E Research Associates, 1977); Low, Victor, The Unimpressible Race: A Century of Educational Struggle by the Chinese in San Francisco (San Francisco: East/West Publishing, 1982); and Weiler, Kathleen, Country Schoolwomen: Teaching in Rural California, 1850–1950 (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1998). On the history of higher education in California, see Douglass, John A., The California Idea and American Higher Education (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
15 Harlow, Neal, California Conquered: The Annexation of a Mexican Province, 1846–1850 (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1982), 318.Google Scholar
16 Quoted in Hansen, , The Search for Authority in California, 86.
17 Starr, , Americans and the California Dream, 55.
18 See, for example, Hendrick, , California Education, 6–16.
19 On the composition of the constitutional convention, see Harlow, , California Conquered, 339. For a discussion of the limited growth of common schooling in the antebellum South, see Kaestle, , Pillars of the Republic, 182–217.
20 Douglass, , The California Idea and American Higher Education, 23.
21 Report of the Debates in the Convention of California on the Formation of the State Constitution: in September and October 1849 (Washington, DC: J. T. Towers, 1850), 204.
22 “Address to the People of California” in Frost, John T., History of the State of California. From the Period of the Conquest by Spain, to Her Occupation by the United States of America (New York: Miller, Orton, 1857), 424.Google Scholar
23 Debates in the Convention of California, 204–205.
24 “Address to the People of California,” 424.
25 Ibid., 423–24.
26 Hyde, Anne F., Empires, Nations, & Families: A History of the North American West, 1800–1860 (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 2011), 435.Google Scholar
27 Ferris, David F., Judge Marvin and the Founding of the California Public School System (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1962), 56.Google Scholar
28 For the political significance of quantification, see Porter, Theodore M., Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1995); and Ferris, , Judge Marvin, 60.Google Scholar
29 Quoted in Ferris, , Judge Marvin, 60.
30 Marvin, John Gage, An Act to Establish a System of Common Schools in the State of California and Other Acts Providing for the Revenue of the Same, with Explanatory Forms (Sacramento: Printed at the Democratic State Journal Office, 1852), 9.Google Scholar
31 Ibid., 2.
32 Ibid., 5. Simply by having the law printed and distributed, Marvin hoped to enhance the power of the legislature's enactment. He had learned from experience. The 1851 law had never been printed, making enforcement impossible.
33 Ibid., vi.
34 Ibid., 2. On the importance and limitations of legibility for state power, see Scott, James C., Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
35 “Report of the Superintendent of Public Instruction,” Marvin, John G. letters and memorandum, 1851–1854, reel 2, (hereafter JGM), Bancroft Library, University of California, Berkeley.
37 Almaguer, , Racial Fault Lines, 45–74.
38 “Report of the Superintendent of Public Instruction,” JGM.
39 To support the expansion of schooling in the state, Marvin sought to incorporate parochial schools into the system by providing state funding to religious schools. Between 1853 and 1855, the state school law allowed religious schools to receive public school money. For more on this early aid to religious schools in California, see Goda, Paul, “The Historical Background of California's Constitutional Provisions Prohibiting Aid to Sectarian Schools,” California Historical Society Quarterly 46, no. 2 (June 1967): 149–71.Google Scholar
40 Eleventh Annual Report of the Superintendent of Public Instruction (San Francisco: Benjamin P. Avery, State Printer, 1862), 56–57.
41 Ferris, , Judge Marvin, 88.
42 Ibid., 102.
43 Fifth Annual Report of the Superintendent of Public Instruction of the State of California (Sacramento, CA: James Allen, State Printer, 1856), 3.
44 Fourth Annual Report of the Superintendent of Public Instruction of the State of California (Sacramento, CA: B. B. Redding, State Printer, 1855), 4.
45 Fifth Annual Report, 8.
46 “Shall Negroes Go to School?” The Nevada Journal [Nevada City, CA], 6 April 1855, 2.
47 Hubbs, Paul K., “Letter from the Superintendent of Public Instruction,” Sacramento Daily Union, 27 March 1855, 2.Google Scholar
53 The 1855 school law also outlawed aid to religious schools, which would have prevented Californio and Mexican children from receiving public support for instruction in Spanish. In 1855, the legislature also overturned the requirement that all laws be published in Spanish. For a discussion of the revised 1855 school law and its implications for Latino communities in Southern California, see MacDonald, Victoria-Maria, Latino Education in the United States: A Narrated History from 1513–2000 (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2004), 63–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
54 “Shall Negroes Go to School?”
55 Before 1855, instruction in Santa Barbara was only available in Spanish. After the passage of the 1855 law, two Anglo school commissioners joined forces with the editors of the Santa Barbara Gazette to advocate English-language instruction in the public schools. While an English-only school was created in 1855, instruction in Spanish remained available. For financial reasons, the English and Spanish classes were combined, and many Anglo families removed their children from the public schools until English instruction was again offered in 1858. See Camarillo, Albert, Chicanos in a Changing Society: From Mexican Pueblos to American Barrios in Santa Barbara and Southern California, 1848–1930 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1979), 17–18.Google Scholar
56 For the controversies surrounding English instruction in American public schools in Los Angeles, see Pitt, Leonard, The Decline of the Californios: A Social History of the Spanish-Speaking Californians, 1846–1890 (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1970), 224–28.Google Scholar
57 Townsend, J. Holland, “American Caste and Common Schools,” Anglo-African Magazine I (March 1859), 81.Google Scholar
58 “Shall Negroes Go to School?”
60 Townsend, , “American Caste and Common Schools,” 81.
61 Berglund, , Making San Francisco American, 8.
62 Planning to migrate north to Washington Territory, Paul Hubbs declined renomination at the next Democratic Party Convention. In his place, delegates nominated former San Francisco city controller and southerner Andrew Jackson Moulder. While Democratic control of state government was challenged the previous year when the Know-Nothing Party assumed power over the governorship and legislative assembly, Moulder was victorious in the 1856 election. “Democratic State Convention Third Day,” Sacramento Daily Union, 12 September 1856, 2. For more on the California Know-Nothing Party, see Johnson, David Alan, Founding the Far West: California, Oregon, and Nevada, 1840–1890 (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1992), 199–202.Google Scholar
63 For a discussion of eastern common school reform rhetoric that focused on the role of early public education in fighting crime, see Kaestle, , Pillars of the Republic, 33, 36; and Katz, , Reconstructing American Education, 16–24.
64 “The Public Schools and Colored Children.”
65 Johnson, , Founding the Far West, 201.
68 Eighth Annual Report of the Superintendent of Public Instruction (Sacramento, CA: Charles T. Botts, State Printer, 1859), 4.
69 Ibid., 4–5.
70 Moulder, Andrew J., Commentaries on the School Law, with the Elements of School Architecture. Laws Relating to the School Lands. Forms and Instructions. (Sacramento, CA: John O'Meara, State Printer, 1858), 103.Google Scholar
71 Ibid., 115.
72 Ibid., 108, 110, 113–14, 116.
73 Seventh Annual Report of the Superintendent of Public Instruction (Sacramento, CA: John O'Meara, State Printer, 1859), 10.
76 “Negroes in the Public Schools,” San Francisco Daily Globe, 10 February 1858, 2.
78 “Colored Children in Public Schools,” Daily Alta California, 20 February 1858, 1.
79 “The Public Schools and Colored Children.”
80 Eighth Annual Report, 14
81 Ibid., 14–15.
82 Ibid., 15.
83 Diggers was a slur Americans used to describe California's indigenous peoples. Eighth Annual Report, 14.
84 “The Public Schools and Colored Children.”
85 Eighth Annual Report, 14.
86 Ibid., 8.
89 Moulder, , Commentaries on the School Law, 9.
91 Ibid., 10.
92 Eighth Annual Report, 4.
93 Moulder, , Commentaries on the School Law, 64.
94 Ibid., 10.
95 “School Matters,” clipping from scrapbook vol. 4, n.d., n.p., Andrew Jackson Moulder Papers MSS C-B 526 (hereafter AMP), Bancroft Library, University of California, Berkeley.
96 Moulder, , Commentaries on the School Law, 65.
97 Eighth Annual Report, 11.
98 Ninth Annual Report of the Superintendent of Public Instruction (Sacramento, CA: Charles T. Botts, State Printer, 1860), 6.
99 Tenth Annual Report of the Superintendent of Public Instruction (Sacramento, CA: Charles T. Botts, State Printer, 1861), 9.
100 Seventh Annual Report, 8.
101 Eleventh Annual Report of the Superintendent of Public Instruction (Sacramento, CA: Benjamin P. Avery, State Printer, 1862), 24.
102 Ibid., 25.
104 “The Trials and Tribulations of a School Officer-No. 3,” clipping from vol. 4, n.d., n.p., AMP.
105 For several examples, see Benicia School Board Records, BANC MSS C-A 147, box 1, folders 6–9.
106 Cloud, , Education in California, 39. Moulder would later serve on the Board of Regents for the University of California and as superintendent of San Francisco schools.
107 Polos, , “A Yankee Patriot,” 21.
108 “Have Negroes Been Taught and Classed on Terms of Equality in a Public School Under the Charge of Mr. John Swett,” n.d., portfolio, Research Materials Related to John Swett MSS 84/176 c, Bancroft Library, University of California, Berkeley.
109 “Statement of John Swett,” Sacramento Daily Union, 20 September 1862, 3.
110 Quoted in Polos, “A Yankee Patriot,” 21.
111 Clipping from Rincon School Scrapbook, p. 9, n.d., carton 2, JSP.
112 “Normal Classes for Teachers,” clipping from Collection of Prose Scrapbook, n.d., p. 26, carton 2, JSP.
115 First Biennial Report of the Superintendent of Public Instruction of the State of California, for the School Years 1864 and 1865 (Sacramento, CA: O. M. Clayes, State Printer, 1866), 272.
116 Ibid., 57.
118 At the conclusion of the conflict, Swett claimed that he had “looked after both sides impartially.” Quoted in Polos, “A Yankee Patriot,” 24.
119 Union Party, California, Proceedings of the Union State Convention, held at Sacramento on the 17th and 18th Days of June, 1862 (San Francisco: Eastman and Godfrey Printers, 1862), 16.
120 Tyack, et al., Law and the Shaping of Public Education, 93.
121 “Public Instruction in California,” American Journal of Education 16 (December 1866): 634.
122 Department of Public Instruction, Revised School Law: Approved March 24, 1866 (Sacramento, CA: O. M. Clayes, State Printer, 1866), 48.
123 Tyack, et al. Law and the Shaping of Public Education, 93.
124 Cloud, , Education in California, 255.
125 Ibid., 42.
126 Quoted in Montgomery, Zachary, The Poison Fountain: or, Anti-Parental Education: Essays on the School Question From a Parental and Non-Sectarian Standpoint (San Francisco: published by the author, 1878), 15.Google Scholar
127 Swett, John, “Address of the Superintendent of Public Instruction of the State of California, Hon. John Swett, Before the State Teachers' Institute, Held in San Francisco, May 7th, 1867” (San Francisco: Towne & Bacon, Book and Job Printers, 1867).Google Scholar
128 Revised School Law, 18.
129 Ward v. Flood , 48 Cal. 36 (1874)
130 Quoted in Montgomery, , The Poison Fountain, 141.
131 Bottoms, , An Aristocracy of Color, 112.
132 Nevertheless, legislators managed to pass a compulsory school law in 1874. For a discussion of the law's passage and its limited effectiveness, see Tyack, et al., “Law and State School Policy”; “Annual Address of Superintendent Fitzgerald, State Teachers' Institute, Nov. 7, 1871,” The California Teacher 9 (December 1871): 162.Google Scholar
133 Starr, , Americans and the California Dream, 132.
134 Burns, John F., introduction to Taming the Elephant, 13.
135 Hendrick, , California Education, 19.