Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T05:57:44.182Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Francois de Callieres and Diplomatic Theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2009

Maurice Keens-Soper
Maurice Keens-Soper
Affiliation:
University of Leicester
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Francois de Callieres (1645–1717) was a diplomatic envoy and man of letters who in 1716 published De la Manière de Négocier avec les Souverains. A Normand of literate and noble, but modest ancestry, he lived for many years in various parts of Europe before securing, somewhat late in a long life, a position in the service of Louis XIV. Although he won admission to the Académie Française for a panegyric on the King and published several other books including a noteworthy contribution to the ‘Battle of the Ancients and Moderns’, the high point in his sombre but determined life came during the Nine Years War when as a secret envoy he negotiated the crucial terms with the Dutch which led to the Congress of Ryswick (1697) and peace. Thereafter he held the sensitive position of secrétaire du cabinet at Versailles and supplied the secretary of state for foreign affairs with a flow of memoranda on the conditions of peace.

Type
Articles
Information
The Historical Journal , Volume 16 , Issue 3 , September 1973 , pp. 485 - 508
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Oakeshott, Michael, Rationalism in Politics (London, 1962).Google Scholar

2 Kertesz, Stephen, Introduction to the grossly defective paperback edition of Callières' On the Manner of Negotiating with Princes (Notre Dame, 1963), p. v.Google Scholar

3 Padelford, N. J. and Lincoln, G. A., The Dynamics of International Politics (New York, 1967), p. 315.Google Scholar

4 Chazelle, Jacques, La Diplomatic (Paris, 1962).Google Scholar

5 The Seventeenth Century 1600–1715, ed. Lossky, Andrew (New York, 1967), pp. 301–20.Google Scholar

6 Ibid. p. 301.

7 Western, J. R., ‘War on a New Scale; professionalism in armies, navies and diplomacy’, The Eighteenth Century, ed. Cobban, Alfred (London, 1969), p. 214.Google Scholar

8 Horn, D. B., The British Diplomatic Service, 1689–1789 (Oxford, 1961).Google Scholar

9 Hatton, Ragnhild, War and Peace 1680–1720, p. 19. Hatton also draws attention to the inadequacies of the Whyte version and quotes from the 1716 English translation.Google Scholar

10 Mattingly, Garrett, Renaissance Diplomacy (London, 1955), ch. viii.Google Scholar

11 Ibid. p. 28.

12 Ibid. p. 211.

13 Ibid. p. 239.

14 Grabar, V. E., De Legatis et Legationibus Tractatus Varii (Dorpat, 1905).Google Scholar

15 Adair, E. R., The Exterritoriality of Ambassadors (London, 1936), p. 16.Google Scholar

16 Gentilis, Albericus, De Legationibus Libri Tres (London, 1585).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

17 Grabar, , op. cit. p. 65–70.Google Scholar

18 Mattingly, , Renaissance Diplomacy, p. 218.Google Scholar

19 Grotius, Hugo, De Jure Belli ac Pacts Libri Tres, translated by Kelsey, F. W. (The classics of International Law, Washington), Book II, ch. xviii, p. 441. ‘But permanent legations, such as are now customary, can be rejected with the best of right; for ancient custom, to which they were unknown, teaches how unnecessary they are’.Google Scholar

20 Mattingly, , Renaissance Diplomacy, p. 115.21Google ScholarIbid.

22 In a second volume De Legatorum Jure Tractatuum Catalogus 1625–1700 V. E. Grabar has listed treatises on diplomacy published in the seventeenth century. Cf. Wines, Roger, ‘The Imperial Circles, Princely Diplomacy and Imperial Reform’, The Journal of Modern History, vol. 39 (1967).Google Scholar

23 Wolf, John B., Louis XIV (London, 1968), p. 218.Google Scholar

24 Rule, John C., ‘King and Minister: Louis XIV and Colbert de Torcy’, William III v. Louis XIV, op. cit. p. 216.Google Scholar

25 Picavet, G. G., La Diplomatic Francaise au Temps de Louis XIV (Paris, 1930), p. 73.Google Scholar

26 Goubert, Pierre, Louis XIV and Twenty Million Frenchmen (London, 1970), p. 297.Google Scholar

27 Ibid. p. 298.

28 In addition to the necessary biographical and administrative studies other relevant materials would include: Instructions, dispatches, memoranda, texts and collections of treaties, the organization of the Foreign Ministry and archives, the memoirs of diplomats, contemporary comment, the law relating to diplomacy, and political theory. In this connexion see the study by Samoyault, Jean-Pierre, Les Bureaux du Secrétariat d'Etat des Affaires Etrangères sous Louis XV (Paris, 1971). Cf. the same author's ‘L'origine sociale des secrétaires d'Etat de Louis XIV’, La Revue d'Histoire Diplomatique (1969). Picavet, already cited, remains the standard work on the French diplomatic mechanism. Published in 1930, his study was designed as a tentative exploration. It has produced no sequel.Google Scholar

29 Mattingly, , Renaissance Diplomacy, p. 115.Google Scholar

30 There exists no study of Wicquefort. I have relied heavily on L. Ed. Lenting's introduction to a nineteenth-century edition of Wicquefort's Histoire des Provinces-Unies des Pais-Bas (Amsterdam, 1861). The introduction is hereafter cited as Lenting.Google Scholar

31 He translated works from English, Spanish and German.

32 Lenting, p. xi.

33 Rowen, H. H., The Ambassador Prepares for War (The Hague, 1957), pp. 31–4 and pp. 43–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

34 Quoted by Lenting, p. xxi.

35 Grabar, V. E., De Legatis ot Legationibus, pp. 152–60.Google Scholar

36 L'Ambassadeur et ses Fonctions (Amsterdam, 1730), I, 1.Google Scholar

37 Ibid.

38 Ibid. p. 2.

39 Ibid.

40 De la Manière de Négocier, p. 79.

41 Ibid.Epitre.

42 Grabar, V. E., De Legatorum Jure Tractatuum Catalogus, pp. 229–304.Google Scholar

43 Grabar lists two Italian treatises, two English, three German and six, including a critique and Wicquefort, in French, ibid.

44 Cf. Behrcns, B., ‘Treatises on the Ambassador Written in the Fifteenth and Early Sixteenth Centuries’, The English Historical Review, II (1936), 616–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

45 De la Science du Monde, p. 204.

46 I do not wish to suggest that this was of recent occurrence. Perhaps the striking feature is the lag between the emergence of independent states and attempts to formulate their condition after Pope and Emperor had ceased to count. Cf. Figgis, J. N., From Gerson to Grotius (London, 1911), ch. vi.Google Scholar

47 Quoted, in Wolf, John, Louis XIV, p. 618.Google Scholar

48 Grabar, , De Legatorum Jure, pp. 303–4.Google Scholar

49 Ibid.

50 I have been unable to consult all the treatises, many of which are to be found only in Rome and other European centres. Grabar produces abstracts of many of the documents as well as full references.

51 de Chamoy, Rousseau, L'ldée du Parfait Ambassadeur, ed. Delavand, L. (Paris, 1912).Google Scholar

52 Ibid. p. 28.

53 ibid. p. 11.

54 Antoine Pecquet, Discours Sur L'Art de Négocier. On Pecquet see:Piccioni, Camille, Les premiers commis des affaires étrangères aux XVII et XVIII Siècles (Paris, 1918)Google Scholar, and Samoyault, J. P., Les Bureaux du Secrétariat D'Etat des Affaires Etrangères Sous Louis XV (Paris, 1971).Google Scholar

55 Pecquet, , Discours sur L'Art de Négocier, Preface, p. vii.Google Scholar

56 Ibid. p. 134.

57 In a chapter on the visits owed on the arrival of a new ambassador Wicquefort insists that in each court there is a routine among envoys which binds them together. ‘L'Ambassadeur est obligé de s'accommoder aux règles qui ont été etablies et n'y peut manquer sans déconcerter l'harmonie, sans laquelle il n'y peut point avoir de conversation entre les Ministres Publics’ L'Ambassadeur et ses Fonctions, ch. xxi, p. 296. Callières is familiar with the same facts though more cautious about the sense of community. ‘II lui est utile et souvent necéssaires de Her commerce et amitié jusqua un certain point.’ De la Manière de Négocier, p. 223.Google Scholar

58 See my article, ‘The French Political Academy, 1712; The School for Ambassadors’, European Studies Review, voII. (1972).Google Scholar

59 Souleyman, E., The Vision of Peace in Seventeenth and Eighteenth Century France (Columbia, 1942)Google Scholar. Hinsley, F. H., Power and the Pursuit of Peace (London, 1965), ch. II.Google Scholar

60 For the abbé de Saint-Pierre see:Drouet, Joseph, L'Abbé de Saint-Pierre (Paris, 1912)Google Scholar, and the more recent study by Perkins, Merle L., The Moral and Political Philosophy of the Abbé de Saint-Pierre (Paris, 1959).Google Scholar

61 De la Manière de Négocier, p. 12.

62 Anderson, M. S., ‘Eighteenth-Century Theories of the Balance of Power’, Studies in Diplomatic History; Essays in memory of Horn, D. B., ed. Hatton, Ragnhild and Anderson, M. S. (London, 1970), pp. 183–98.Google Scholar

63 Puffendorf, Samuel, De jure naturae et gentium libri octo, translated by Simmons, J., The Classics of International Law (Washington, 1934), II, 1043. I am grateful to the late Martin Wight for this reference and for much encouragement.Google Scholar

64 The Annual Register, 1787, p. 1.

65 Burke, Edmund, Letters on a Regicide Peace, II, Works viii, p. 243 note.Google Scholar